What is the Criteria to pass to Interview?

[Conrad]

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

[Conrad 2,465]

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

[Quillhan]

I’d also like to hear more about the process from apps opening to a candidate being accepted.

[Quillhan 472]

I’d also like to hear more about the process from apps opening to a candidate being accepted.

[Finn]

I would also like to know. It sure looks like this is bias in favor of current leadership, and I would hate to think that the High Command team would be so openly bias towards something as important as BCMD apps.

[Finn 730]

I would also like to know. It sure looks like this is bias in favor of current leadership, and I would hate to think that the High Command team would be so openly bias towards something as important as BCMD apps.

[DirtyDanLIT]

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

Edited May 17, 2025 by DirtyDanLIT

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

Edited May 17, 2025 by DirtyDanLIT

[Conrad]

4 minutes ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

So then what is the threshold? This app is -4 overall, with a TON of negative feedback from the battalion that he is applying for. So again, do our voices even matter?

[Conrad 2,465]

4 minutes ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

So then what is the threshold? This app is -4 overall, with a TON of negative feedback from the battalion that he is applying for. So again, do our voices even matter?

[Wheezy]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

I agree with DirtyDan. I can say I've seen some apps that had a lot more -1's than +1's and they at least got to the interview stage where they were later denied after their interview. Some were even accepted but very few from what I remember.

[Wheezy 80]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Prolly just a close to somewhat comparable amount of +1's? 
Even then when was the last time someone was denied at the application stage? Were there votes literally only -1's? What was the ratio? Is this truly a bias scenario?

I agree with DirtyDan. I can say I've seen some apps that had a lot more -1's than +1's and they at least got to the interview stage where they were later denied after their interview. Some were even accepted but very few from what I remember.

[Wheezy]

I personally think the interview phase is what really matters but I do think that more people should be involved within the interview phase and who determines who gets what. I honestly think that CMDs of the battalion should be involved or at least be present in the interview. Just to hear it 

[Wheezy 80]

I personally think the interview phase is what really matters but I do think that more people should be involved within the interview phase and who determines who gets what. I honestly think that CMDs of the battalion should be involved or at least be present in the interview. Just to hear it 

[Marvel]

As someone who has been in the position of accepting/denying CMD apps with mixed community votes in the past if the votes were off by a few the only time I would ever move it forward was with a HC vote which required a unanimous decision to move it to pending. Which never actually happened so I avoided that PR disaster lol.

It is technically up to the Director’s discretion however regardless of the outcome of the interview the votes should always be brought into consideration when making a final decision.

Regardless insight should be given to the community. If a HC vote transpired we should be made aware. If Directors just decided to do this on their own free will then that’s a huge fumble and I’m sure they’ll lose a lot of trust from the community. 
 

Edit: Maybe something that should require a written rule/disclaimer perhaps. Or just outright gotten rid of.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Marvel

[Marvel 3,308]

As someone who has been in the position of accepting/denying CMD apps with mixed community votes in the past if the votes were off by a few the only time I would ever move it forward was with a HC vote which required a unanimous decision to move it to pending. Which never actually happened so I avoided that PR disaster lol.

It is technically up to the Director’s discretion however regardless of the outcome of the interview the votes should always be brought into consideration when making a final decision.

Regardless insight should be given to the community. If a HC vote transpired we should be made aware. If Directors just decided to do this on their own free will then that’s a huge fumble and I’m sure they’ll lose a lot of trust from the community. 
 

Edit: Maybe something that should require a written rule/disclaimer perhaps. Or just outright gotten rid of.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Marvel

[DirtyDanLIT]

@The Goat Would you like to weight in?

 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

@The Goat Would you like to weight in?

 

[Marvel]

@The Goat lets hear it buddy

[Marvel 3,308]

@The Goat lets hear it buddy

[KaiserNeiner]

@The Goatwell…we’re waiting 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

@The Goatwell…we’re waiting 

[BROPDROP]

26 minutes ago, Wheezy said:

I personally think the interview phase is what really matters but I do think that more people should be involved within the interview phase and who determines who gets what. I honestly think that CMDs of the battalion should be involved or at least be present in the interview. Just to hear it 

This may be the case but realistically speaking if the -1's and +1's were switched we know for a fact we would not be having this conversation 

[BROPDROP 395]

26 minutes ago, Wheezy said:

I personally think the interview phase is what really matters but I do think that more people should be involved within the interview phase and who determines who gets what. I honestly think that CMDs of the battalion should be involved or at least be present in the interview. Just to hear it 

This may be the case but realistically speaking if the -1's and +1's were switched we know for a fact we would not be having this conversation 

[Guest]

At this point, it feels like half the server is just trading passive-aggressive energy. Y’all don’t even hide that you can’t stand each other—now we’re doing these weird, indirect aura checks run by third parties as proxies. (both sides  doing this reasoning its so weird)

LETS CUT TO THE GOOD PART

 

I WANT EITHER BANA GROUP TO SUGGEST TO CHANGE 241ST TO 327TH IN A GOOD FOURMS POST @sobde  IT MIGHT ACTAULLY PASS THROUGH BUT YALL JUST WANAN TALK ABOUT IT INSTEAD OF ACTIONS BRO ACTIONS  THIS IS A PERFECT TIME TO SUGGEST IT JUST GET SOMEONE TO SUPPORT IT THIS WILL MAKE THE CHOICE EASIER FOR HC/DEV TEAM TO OGRANIZE 

 

OR 

 

I WANT THE 241ST HC TO REPORT THE HC TO ACTAULLY FIGHT BACK CAUSE YALL ARE JUST BEING PUSSIES BRO YOUR BATTALION GETTING OVERTAKEN  THESE DIRECTORS/HIGH COMMAND LOWKEY ARE SO BAD AT BEING BIASED THIS IS THE EASIEST TAKE OVER EVER BUT THEY WILDIN RECENTLY LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

 

ONE YALL GOTTA DO SOMETHING WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AURA STANCE I WANT ACTION BOTH PARTIES HAVE MORE POWER 

Edited May 17, 2025 by The Goat

[Guest]

At this point, it feels like half the server is just trading passive-aggressive energy. Y’all don’t even hide that you can’t stand each other—now we’re doing these weird, indirect aura checks run by third parties as proxies. (both sides  doing this reasoning its so weird)

LETS CUT TO THE GOOD PART

 

I WANT EITHER BANA GROUP TO SUGGEST TO CHANGE 241ST TO 327TH IN A GOOD FOURMS POST @sobde  IT MIGHT ACTAULLY PASS THROUGH BUT YALL JUST WANAN TALK ABOUT IT INSTEAD OF ACTIONS BRO ACTIONS  THIS IS A PERFECT TIME TO SUGGEST IT JUST GET SOMEONE TO SUPPORT IT THIS WILL MAKE THE CHOICE EASIER FOR HC/DEV TEAM TO OGRANIZE 

 

OR 

 

I WANT THE 241ST HC TO REPORT THE HC TO ACTAULLY FIGHT BACK CAUSE YALL ARE JUST BEING PUSSIES BRO YOUR BATTALION GETTING OVERTAKEN  THESE DIRECTORS/HIGH COMMAND LOWKEY ARE SO BAD AT BEING BIASED THIS IS THE EASIEST TAKE OVER EVER BUT THEY WILDIN RECENTLY LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

 

ONE YALL GOTTA DO SOMETHING WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AURA STANCE I WANT ACTION BOTH PARTIES HAVE MORE POWER 

Edited May 17, 2025 by The Goat

[Conrad]

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is just favoritism. Any other excuse is a lie. I have reported both directors to their superiors. You may close this if you wish, i have my answer.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Conrad

[Conrad 2,465]

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is just favoritism. Any other excuse is a lie. I have reported both directors to their superiors. You may close this if you wish, i have my answer.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Conrad

[Wheezy]

24 minutes ago, The Goat said:

At this point, it feels like half the server is just trading passive-aggressive energy. Y’all don’t even hide that you can’t stand each other—now we’re doing these weird, indirect aura checks run by third parties as proxies. (both sides  doing this reasoning its so weird)

LETS CUT TO THE GOOD PART

 

I WANT EITHER BANA GROUP TO SUGGEST TO CHANGE 241ST TO 327TH IN A GOOD FOURMS POST @sobde  IT MIGHT ACTAULLY PASS THROUGH BUT YALL JUST WANAN TALK ABOUT IT INSTEAD OF ACTIONS BRO ACTIONS  THIS IS A PERFECT TIME TO SUGGEST IT JUST GET SOMEONE TO SUPPORT IT THIS WILL MAKE THE CHOICE EASIER FOR HC/DEV TEAM TO OGRANIZE 

 

OR 

 

I WANT THE 241ST HC TO REPORT THE HC TO ACTAULLY FIGHT BACK CAUSE YALL ARE JUST BEING PUSSIES BRO YOUR BATTALION GETTING OVERTAKEN  THESE DIRECTORS/HIGH COMMAND LOWKEY ARE SO BAD AT BEING BIASED THIS IS THE EASIEST TAKE OVER EVER BUT THEY WILDIN RECENTLY LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

 

ONE YALL GOTTA DO SOMETHING WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AURA STANCE I WANT ACTION BOTH PARTIES HAVE MORE POWER 

This may be something here. 
 

HAS THE GOAT DONE IT AGAIN? WILL HE BE THE CHOSEN ONE ONCE MORE?

[Wheezy 80]

24 minutes ago, The Goat said:

At this point, it feels like half the server is just trading passive-aggressive energy. Y’all don’t even hide that you can’t stand each other—now we’re doing these weird, indirect aura checks run by third parties as proxies. (both sides  doing this reasoning its so weird)

LETS CUT TO THE GOOD PART

 

I WANT EITHER BANA GROUP TO SUGGEST TO CHANGE 241ST TO 327TH IN A GOOD FOURMS POST @sobde  IT MIGHT ACTAULLY PASS THROUGH BUT YALL JUST WANAN TALK ABOUT IT INSTEAD OF ACTIONS BRO ACTIONS  THIS IS A PERFECT TIME TO SUGGEST IT JUST GET SOMEONE TO SUPPORT IT THIS WILL MAKE THE CHOICE EASIER FOR HC/DEV TEAM TO OGRANIZE 

 

OR 

 

I WANT THE 241ST HC TO REPORT THE HC TO ACTAULLY FIGHT BACK CAUSE YALL ARE JUST BEING PUSSIES BRO YOUR BATTALION GETTING OVERTAKEN  THESE DIRECTORS/HIGH COMMAND LOWKEY ARE SO BAD AT BEING BIASED THIS IS THE EASIEST TAKE OVER EVER BUT THEY WILDIN RECENTLY LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

 

ONE YALL GOTTA DO SOMETHING WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AURA STANCE I WANT ACTION BOTH PARTIES HAVE MORE POWER 

This may be something here. 
 

HAS THE GOAT DONE IT AGAIN? WILL HE BE THE CHOSEN ONE ONCE MORE?

[BROPDROP]

20 minutes ago, Conrad said:

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is true I am now very curious myself

[BROPDROP 395]

20 minutes ago, Conrad said:

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is true I am now very curious myself

[GregRocks]

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

Did you all forget that this is just a videogame? Or do you all have nothing better to do with your lives? This whole voting process has turned Synergy into a war zone. Factions of people fighting against factions of others. People who would -1 the other app JUST because they want to see the other as BCMD, not based on the merits of the actual application. This is so sad to see. We're all here pretending we're Star Wars characters on an outdated videogame. I promise NONE of it is that deep.

You want to know the truth? You're right. We have very little choice in a lot of these matters. So what? As much as I hate legacy picks, it's over. They made it to interview. Truthfully, if we ran solely on majority vote, the server would die in a month. Similarly, if 241st wasn't in such a BAD position on the server, Bana never would have applied.

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

All of Synergy needs to see this for what it is. This is a videogame. There is NO reason we should have this sort of drama so actively pushed by our server legacy members, and there is no reason we should let it change our moods while playing this game. Shame on every esteemed Synergy individual who pressed this drama.

Get back to playing the game. If you don't like it, get off.

Edited May 17, 2025 by GregRocks

[GregRocks 137]

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

Did you all forget that this is just a videogame? Or do you all have nothing better to do with your lives? This whole voting process has turned Synergy into a war zone. Factions of people fighting against factions of others. People who would -1 the other app JUST because they want to see the other as BCMD, not based on the merits of the actual application. This is so sad to see. We're all here pretending we're Star Wars characters on an outdated videogame. I promise NONE of it is that deep.

You want to know the truth? You're right. We have very little choice in a lot of these matters. So what? As much as I hate legacy picks, it's over. They made it to interview. Truthfully, if we ran solely on majority vote, the server would die in a month. Similarly, if 241st wasn't in such a BAD position on the server, Bana never would have applied.

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

All of Synergy needs to see this for what it is. This is a videogame. There is NO reason we should have this sort of drama so actively pushed by our server legacy members, and there is no reason we should let it change our moods while playing this game. Shame on every esteemed Synergy individual who pressed this drama.

Get back to playing the game. If you don't like it, get off.

Edited May 17, 2025 by GregRocks

[Charles]

Tukk Tuah

[Charles 178]

Tukk Tuah

[LoFi]

what

 

[LoFi 41]

what

 

[Canary]

ah hell

[Canary 51]

ah hell

[LoFi]

riddle me this batman 
what

[LoFi 41]

riddle me this batman 
what

[Zeros]

9 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server.

Based

[Zeros 315]

9 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server.

Based

[LoFi]

scorboard

[LoFi 41]

scorboard

[DirtyDanLIT]

37 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

Did you all forget that this is just a videogame? Or do you all have nothing better to do with your lives? This whole voting process has turned Synergy into a war zone. Factions of people fighting against factions of others. People who would -1 the other app JUST because they want to see the other as BCMD, not based on the merits of the actual application. This is so sad to see. We're all here pretending we're Star Wars characters on an outdated videogame. I promise NONE of it is that deep.

You want to know the truth? You're right. We have very little choice in a lot of these matters. So what? As much as I hate legacy picks, it's over. They made it to interview. Truthfully, if we ran solely on majority vote, the server would die in a month. Similarly, if 241st wasn't in such a BAD position on the server, Bana never would have applied.

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

All of Synergy needs to see this for what it is. This is a videogame. There is NO reason we should have this sort of drama so actively pushed by our server legacy members, and there is no reason we should let it change our moods while playing this game. Shame on every esteemed Synergy individual who pressed this drama.

Get back to playing the game. If you don't like it, get off.

Honestly based 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

37 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

Did you all forget that this is just a videogame? Or do you all have nothing better to do with your lives? This whole voting process has turned Synergy into a war zone. Factions of people fighting against factions of others. People who would -1 the other app JUST because they want to see the other as BCMD, not based on the merits of the actual application. This is so sad to see. We're all here pretending we're Star Wars characters on an outdated videogame. I promise NONE of it is that deep.

You want to know the truth? You're right. We have very little choice in a lot of these matters. So what? As much as I hate legacy picks, it's over. They made it to interview. Truthfully, if we ran solely on majority vote, the server would die in a month. Similarly, if 241st wasn't in such a BAD position on the server, Bana never would have applied.

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

All of Synergy needs to see this for what it is. This is a videogame. There is NO reason we should have this sort of drama so actively pushed by our server legacy members, and there is no reason we should let it change our moods while playing this game. Shame on every esteemed Synergy individual who pressed this drama.

Get back to playing the game. If you don't like it, get off.

Honestly based 

[Underpaidstaff]

Current votes as of now since being moved to pending:  Positive  15 Negative  19 I counted manually, so +-1 on either side. 

We've accepted this type of candidate for interview before. A lot of times in the past, we've looked at the action of the person when they're in leadership positions. I fully realize there is a large majority of people from the outside of the battalion in support & a large portion inside that don't, usually that type of divide goes to interview to compare and contrast the vision for the battalion based of the people's answers. I'm pretty sure Conrad is aware of that as well.   When it comes to waive rules, I think having rules around a waive is just dumb asf, it's called a waive for a reason.

Realistically this is not without precedent. Off the top of my head alone I can think of Xaze's push from Fox to Recon RCMD. 

 

Edited May 17, 2025 by Underpaidstaff

[Underpaidstaff 192]

Current votes as of now since being moved to pending:  Positive  15 Negative  19 I counted manually, so +-1 on either side. 

We've accepted this type of candidate for interview before. A lot of times in the past, we've looked at the action of the person when they're in leadership positions. I fully realize there is a large majority of people from the outside of the battalion in support & a large portion inside that don't, usually that type of divide goes to interview to compare and contrast the vision for the battalion based of the people's answers. I'm pretty sure Conrad is aware of that as well.   When it comes to waive rules, I think having rules around a waive is just dumb asf, it's called a waive for a reason.

Realistically this is not without precedent. Off the top of my head alone I can think of Xaze's push from Fox to Recon RCMD. 

 

Edited May 17, 2025 by Underpaidstaff

[euxoii]

Booyah

[euxoii 11]

Booyah

[DirtyDanLIT]

50 minutes ago, Charles said:

Tukk Tuah

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

50 minutes ago, Charles said:

Tukk Tuah

[KaiserNeiner]

17 minutes ago, Underpaidstaff said:

Current votes as of now since being moved to pending:  Positive  15 Negative  19 I counted manually, so +-1 on either side. 

We've accepted this type of candidate for interview before. A lot of times in the past, we've looked at the action of the person when they're in leadership positions. I fully realize there is a large majority of people from the outside of the battalion in support & a large portion inside that don't, usually that type of divide goes to interview to compare and contrast the vision for the battalion based of the people's answers. I'm pretty sure Conrad is aware of that as well.   When it comes to waive rules, I think having rules around a waive is just dumb asf, it's called a waive for a reason.

Realistically this is not without precedent. Off the top of my head alone I can think of Xaze's push from Fox to Recon RCMD. 

 

I actually appreciate this reply, even if it looks bad that’s it’s still a HC member defending potential HC bias. Clorox is probably the most trusted person within HC atm. 
 

can you give some examples of individuals that have made it to interview with more -1s than +1s tho? 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

17 minutes ago, Underpaidstaff said:

Current votes as of now since being moved to pending:  Positive  15 Negative  19 I counted manually, so +-1 on either side. 

We've accepted this type of candidate for interview before. A lot of times in the past, we've looked at the action of the person when they're in leadership positions. I fully realize there is a large majority of people from the outside of the battalion in support & a large portion inside that don't, usually that type of divide goes to interview to compare and contrast the vision for the battalion based of the people's answers. I'm pretty sure Conrad is aware of that as well.   When it comes to waive rules, I think having rules around a waive is just dumb asf, it's called a waive for a reason.

Realistically this is not without precedent. Off the top of my head alone I can think of Xaze's push from Fox to Recon RCMD. 

 

I actually appreciate this reply, even if it looks bad that’s it’s still a HC member defending potential HC bias. Clorox is probably the most trusted person within HC atm. 
 

can you give some examples of individuals that have made it to interview with more -1s than +1s tho? 

[Funnyman]

1 hour ago, Conrad said:

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is just favoritism. Any other excuse is a lie. I have reported both directors to their superiors. You may close this if you wish, i have my answer.

bless up i entirely forgot about this change. real talk tho why we letting bana through, like what makes him the exception? I wont deny he's done some good stuff but if this rule is in place to why would we bypass it for him

Edited May 17, 2025 by Funnyman

[Funnyman 203]

1 hour ago, Conrad said:

Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?

This is just favoritism. Any other excuse is a lie. I have reported both directors to their superiors. You may close this if you wish, i have my answer.

bless up i entirely forgot about this change. real talk tho why we letting bana through, like what makes him the exception? I wont deny he's done some good stuff but if this rule is in place to why would we bypass it for him

Edited May 17, 2025 by Funnyman

[BROPDROP]

5 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bless up i entirely forgot about this change. real talk tho why we letting bana through, like what makes him the exception? I wont deny he's done some good stuff but if this rule is in place to why would we bypass it for him

2 times asked in the last hour still zero response

[BROPDROP 395]

5 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bless up i entirely forgot about this change. real talk tho why we letting bana through, like what makes him the exception? I wont deny he's done some good stuff but if this rule is in place to why would we bypass it for him

2 times asked in the last hour still zero response

[Mystic]

You guys forget Turf Fish got a BCMD interview and he was a minge who'd been banned very recently several times.
There's nothing wrong with giving an interview to a long time trusted member of the community when the -1s barely outweighed the +1s. 

 

As former recent HC I loved hearing out every interview regardless of my opinions or others votes. Interview is 100x more important than what people's friends think on the forums. 

 

Edited May 17, 2025 by Mystic

[Mystic 1,496]

You guys forget Turf Fish got a BCMD interview and he was a minge who'd been banned very recently several times.
There's nothing wrong with giving an interview to a long time trusted member of the community when the -1s barely outweighed the +1s. 

 

As former recent HC I loved hearing out every interview regardless of my opinions or others votes. Interview is 100x more important than what people's friends think on the forums. 

 

Edited May 17, 2025 by Mystic

[ジョーイ金型]

Guys why cant we just hug it out

[ジョーイ金型 59]

Guys why cant we just hug it out

[Finn]

21 minutes ago, Mystic said:

You guys forget Turf Fish got a BCMD interview and he was a minge who'd been banned very recently several times.
There's nothing wrong with giving an interview to a long time trusted member of the community when the -1s barely outweighed the +1s. 

 

As former recent HC I loved hearing out every interview regardless of my opinions or others votes. Interview is 100x more important than what people's friends think on the forums. 

 

212th didn't exactly want him to get an interview either...

[Finn 730]

21 minutes ago, Mystic said:

You guys forget Turf Fish got a BCMD interview and he was a minge who'd been banned very recently several times.
There's nothing wrong with giving an interview to a long time trusted member of the community when the -1s barely outweighed the +1s. 

 

As former recent HC I loved hearing out every interview regardless of my opinions or others votes. Interview is 100x more important than what people's friends think on the forums. 

 

212th didn't exactly want him to get an interview either...

[Mystic]

20 minutes ago, Finn said:

212th didn't exactly want him to get an interview either...

see? 241st didn't want Bana to get one lol.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Mystic

[Mystic 1,496]

20 minutes ago, Finn said:

212th didn't exactly want him to get an interview either...

see? 241st didn't want Bana to get one lol.

Edited May 17, 2025 by Mystic

[Marvel]

46 minutes ago, Mystic said:

see? 241st didn't want Bana to get one lol.

the best BCMDs are the ones the battalion never wanted. It's like dads with dogs they said no to getting but they got them anyway

Edited May 17, 2025 by Marvel

[Marvel 3,308]

46 minutes ago, Mystic said:

see? 241st didn't want Bana to get one lol.

the best BCMDs are the ones the battalion never wanted. It's like dads with dogs they said no to getting but they got them anyway

Edited May 17, 2025 by Marvel

[Eclipse]

This is sooooo cringe bro you guys were so unhappy that a guy you don't love didn't get denied at the application stage that you banded together to make a post and show off how tough you and your posse is

The nature of this post is in no way the way you are trying to show it to be. This isn't a rule clarification genuine post where you are genuinely curious on the criteria for clarification purposes  this is a "Why didn't Bana get denied" post where you express your frustration that things aren't going your way and search for a rule that can be counted as broken so that it does go your way. While the waive rules being broken are fair to call out, to be completly honest with you its 100% nitpicking. You hunted down any possible rule he could've broken then launched it onto with a snide and cheeky grin on your face as a gotcha moment. Personally speaking, I feel as though his qualifications and past experience proving that he is more than capable of the duties entailed by a BCMD should negate the need for him to be a WO or higher as it is realistic to assume that he'd be experienced with duties that are expected of a WO or higher but I digress. You found that rule so you could try and get him and for no other reason.

3 hours ago, GregRocks said:

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

[Eclipse 820]

This is sooooo cringe bro you guys were so unhappy that a guy you don't love didn't get denied at the application stage that you banded together to make a post and show off how tough you and your posse is

The nature of this post is in no way the way you are trying to show it to be. This isn't a rule clarification genuine post where you are genuinely curious on the criteria for clarification purposes  this is a "Why didn't Bana get denied" post where you express your frustration that things aren't going your way and search for a rule that can be counted as broken so that it does go your way. While the waive rules being broken are fair to call out, to be completly honest with you its 100% nitpicking. You hunted down any possible rule he could've broken then launched it onto with a snide and cheeky grin on your face as a gotcha moment. Personally speaking, I feel as though his qualifications and past experience proving that he is more than capable of the duties entailed by a BCMD should negate the need for him to be a WO or higher as it is realistic to assume that he'd be experienced with duties that are expected of a WO or higher but I digress. You found that rule so you could try and get him and for no other reason.

3 hours ago, GregRocks said:

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month.

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

[DirtyDanLIT]

1 minute ago, Eclipse said:

This is sooooo cringe bro you guys were so unhappy that a guy you don't love didn't get denied at the application stage that you banded together to make a post and show off how tough you and your posse is

The nature of this post is in no way the way you are trying to show it to be. This isn't a rule clarification genuine post where you are genuinely curious on the criteria for clarification purposes  this is a "Why didn't Bana get denied" post where you express your frustration that things aren't going your way and search for a rule that can be counted as broken so that it does go your way. While the waive rules being broken are fair to call out, to be completly honest with you its 100% nitpicking. You hunted down any possible rule he could've broken then launched it onto with a snide and cheeky grin on your face as a gotcha moment. Personally speaking, I feel as though his qualifications and past experience proving that he is more than capable of the duties entailed by a BCMD should negate the need for him to be a WO or higher as it is realistic to assume that he'd be experienced with duties that are expected of a WO or higher but I digress. You found that rule so you could try and get him and for no other reason.

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

Honestly I was boutta say something like this after I got off of work, this whole post did come off as something with the intentions of starting discourse and drama.  forcing the hands of HC to get your way instead of simply you know, sending a discord dm or simply taking to them

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

1 minute ago, Eclipse said:

This is sooooo cringe bro you guys were so unhappy that a guy you don't love didn't get denied at the application stage that you banded together to make a post and show off how tough you and your posse is

The nature of this post is in no way the way you are trying to show it to be. This isn't a rule clarification genuine post where you are genuinely curious on the criteria for clarification purposes  this is a "Why didn't Bana get denied" post where you express your frustration that things aren't going your way and search for a rule that can be counted as broken so that it does go your way. While the waive rules being broken are fair to call out, to be completly honest with you its 100% nitpicking. You hunted down any possible rule he could've broken then launched it onto with a snide and cheeky grin on your face as a gotcha moment. Personally speaking, I feel as though his qualifications and past experience proving that he is more than capable of the duties entailed by a BCMD should negate the need for him to be a WO or higher as it is realistic to assume that he'd be experienced with duties that are expected of a WO or higher but I digress. You found that rule so you could try and get him and for no other reason.

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

Honestly I was boutta say something like this after I got off of work, this whole post did come off as something with the intentions of starting discourse and drama.  forcing the hands of HC to get your way instead of simply you know, sending a discord dm or simply taking to them

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Honestly I was boutta say something like this after I got off of work, this whole post did come off as something with the intentions of starting discourse and drama.  forcing the hands of HC to get your way instead of simply you know, sending a discord dm or simply taking to them

YOU ARE SUCH A PUSSY BRO YOU WERE NOT GONNA SAY THIS DO NOT STEAL A MAN THUNDER WHEN HE DECLARES WAR LIKE TIHS I LOVE DIRTYDAN BUT  THIS IS NOT AURA !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

I DEMAND ALL PEOPLE VIEWING THIS THREAD TO TUSLE  ONLY IN THE BATTLE OF IDEAS WILL WE ACTAULLY KNOW WHAT DIRECTION TO MOVE FORWARD THIS IS THE ERA OF EFFORT NO MORE NON CHALANT AURA FARMING 

Edited May 18, 2025 by The Goat

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Honestly I was boutta say something like this after I got off of work, this whole post did come off as something with the intentions of starting discourse and drama.  forcing the hands of HC to get your way instead of simply you know, sending a discord dm or simply taking to them

YOU ARE SUCH A PUSSY BRO YOU WERE NOT GONNA SAY THIS DO NOT STEAL A MAN THUNDER WHEN HE DECLARES WAR LIKE TIHS I LOVE DIRTYDAN BUT  THIS IS NOT AURA !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

I DEMAND ALL PEOPLE VIEWING THIS THREAD TO TUSLE  ONLY IN THE BATTLE OF IDEAS WILL WE ACTAULLY KNOW WHAT DIRECTION TO MOVE FORWARD THIS IS THE ERA OF EFFORT NO MORE NON CHALANT AURA FARMING 

Edited May 18, 2025 by The Goat

[KuroBearQ]

How I see this post is like 50/50 yes i can understand that people are upset about some decision and why they are upset about those decision because what is stated in the rules about the waives. but i can also see this post was somewhat unneeded or in a sense of ask/made differently then what it is right now.  I also feel sometimes that there is a lot of biased sometimes about some decision (this is just how i see it). but that is sadly how humans behave. 

I like to see a explanation about the WO waives rule and how Bana was allowed. because that is a little bit weird. but i also think Bana can do a great job too 

But yeah either way in my eyes i still think they are both not really suited at the moment to become tukk but that's is just a opinion A KURO OPINION :3

 

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk



 

 

[KuroBearQ 6]

How I see this post is like 50/50 yes i can understand that people are upset about some decision and why they are upset about those decision because what is stated in the rules about the waives. but i can also see this post was somewhat unneeded or in a sense of ask/made differently then what it is right now.  I also feel sometimes that there is a lot of biased sometimes about some decision (this is just how i see it). but that is sadly how humans behave. 

I like to see a explanation about the WO waives rule and how Bana was allowed. because that is a little bit weird. but i also think Bana can do a great job too 

But yeah either way in my eyes i still think they are both not really suited at the moment to become tukk but that's is just a opinion A KURO OPINION :3

 

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk



 

 

[BROPDROP]

4 hours ago, GregRocks said:

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement?

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Edited May 18, 2025 by BROPDROP

[BROPDROP 395]

4 hours ago, GregRocks said:

Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement?

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Edited May 18, 2025 by BROPDROP

[DirtyDanLIT]

16 minutes ago, BROPDROP said:

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Ain't gonna lie brotien shake, ion think this is the main issue

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

16 minutes ago, BROPDROP said:

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Ain't gonna lie brotien shake, ion think this is the main issue

[GregRocks]

10 minutes ago, BROPDROP said:

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Somehow, you missed the entire point of that post.

I’ll remind you, I -1 Bana. My post was not because I support him for BCMD. My problem is with Conrad and everybody else here causing drama on a roleplay server.

Everybody here pretending to be outraged by this was mad when Bana posted his application in the first place. Don’t pretend this is about the rules. Clearly, those rules were put in place to stop some random from coming and wasting our time with a nothing BCMD application. I’ll also point out that nobody here calling out the rules has ever made a peep the countless other times they’ve been broken. I’d be willing to bet not a single one even knew about these guidelines before this post went up.

I think it’s really sad that you guys have nothing better to do than sit here and whine about this. Believe it or not, we don’t always get what we want. I didn’t want Bana as the BCMD, but at least I can accept that he might get it anyways.

Go find something actually worth getting angry about. Stop dividing the community and needlessly causing drama over this.

 

[GregRocks 137]

10 minutes ago, BROPDROP said:

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

Somehow, you missed the entire point of that post.

I’ll remind you, I -1 Bana. My post was not because I support him for BCMD. My problem is with Conrad and everybody else here causing drama on a roleplay server.

Everybody here pretending to be outraged by this was mad when Bana posted his application in the first place. Don’t pretend this is about the rules. Clearly, those rules were put in place to stop some random from coming and wasting our time with a nothing BCMD application. I’ll also point out that nobody here calling out the rules has ever made a peep the countless other times they’ve been broken. I’d be willing to bet not a single one even knew about these guidelines before this post went up.

I think it’s really sad that you guys have nothing better to do than sit here and whine about this. Believe it or not, we don’t always get what we want. I didn’t want Bana as the BCMD, but at least I can accept that he might get it anyways.

Go find something actually worth getting angry about. Stop dividing the community and needlessly causing drama over this.

 

[BROPDROP]

9 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

Somehow, you missed the entire point of that post.

I’ll remind you, I -1 Bana. My post was not because I support him for BCMD. My problem is with Conrad and everybody else here causing drama on a roleplay server.

Everybody here pretending to be outraged by this was mad when Bana posted his application in the first place. Don’t pretend this is about the rules. Clearly, those rules were put in place to stop some random from coming and wasting our time with a nothing BCMD application. I’ll also point out that nobody here calling out the rules has ever made a peep the countless other times they’ve been broken. I’d be willing to bet not a single one even knew about these guidelines before this post went up.

I think it’s really sad that you guys have nothing better to do than sit here and whine about this. Believe it or not, we don’t always get what we want. I didn’t want Bana as the BCMD, but at least I can accept that he might get it anyways.

Go find something actually worth getting angry about. Stop dividing the community and needlessly causing drama over this.

 

I'm not angry about anything just simply stating inaccuracies in your rant I do not care who is to receive the 241st position

[BROPDROP 395]

9 minutes ago, GregRocks said:

Somehow, you missed the entire point of that post.

I’ll remind you, I -1 Bana. My post was not because I support him for BCMD. My problem is with Conrad and everybody else here causing drama on a roleplay server.

Everybody here pretending to be outraged by this was mad when Bana posted his application in the first place. Don’t pretend this is about the rules. Clearly, those rules were put in place to stop some random from coming and wasting our time with a nothing BCMD application. I’ll also point out that nobody here calling out the rules has ever made a peep the countless other times they’ve been broken. I’d be willing to bet not a single one even knew about these guidelines before this post went up.

I think it’s really sad that you guys have nothing better to do than sit here and whine about this. Believe it or not, we don’t always get what we want. I didn’t want Bana as the BCMD, but at least I can accept that he might get it anyways.

Go find something actually worth getting angry about. Stop dividing the community and needlessly causing drama over this.

 

I'm not angry about anything just simply stating inaccuracies in your rant I do not care who is to receive the 241st position

[DirtyDanLIT]

1 hour ago, BROPDROP said:

I'm not angry about anything just simply stating inaccuracies in your rant I do not care who is to receive the 241st position

Ngl bro 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

1 hour ago, BROPDROP said:

I'm not angry about anything just simply stating inaccuracies in your rant I do not care who is to receive the 241st position

Ngl bro 

[Srama]

Hey man, if Super can get a second Yoda term with the majority of his Council -1ing him including his Mace Windu then anyone can get it. 

[Srama 41]

Hey man, if Super can get a second Yoda term with the majority of his Council -1ing him including his Mace Windu then anyone can get it. 

[Kurt]

Old man here to add my 2 cents.

Yes, there has been bias in HC in the past. I'm sorry Conrad, but you were definitely the Golden Child back in the day. But that was the past not now. Granted I tend to stay away from the Drama of the server. To answer your question, I know the Directors and HC always look to improving and keeping the server alive. I've been on the back end of being rejected for a waive or losing a position to another player who they thought would be a better pick, and they were right. 

(Okay @Ratioyou can dumb me now)

[Kurt 367]

Old man here to add my 2 cents.

Yes, there has been bias in HC in the past. I'm sorry Conrad, but you were definitely the Golden Child back in the day. But that was the past not now. Granted I tend to stay away from the Drama of the server. To answer your question, I know the Directors and HC always look to improving and keeping the server alive. I've been on the back end of being rejected for a waive or losing a position to another player who they thought would be a better pick, and they were right. 

(Okay @Ratioyou can dumb me now)

[ジョーイ金型]

[ジョーイ金型 59]

[KillJoy]

2 hours ago, Kurt said:

Old man here to add my 2 cents.

Yes, there has been bias in HC in the past. I'm sorry Conrad, but you were definitely the Golden Child back in the day. But that was the past not now. Granted I tend to stay away from the Drama of the server. To answer your question, I know the Directors and HC always look to improving and keeping the server alive. I've been on the back end of being rejected for a waive or losing a position to another player who they thought would be a better pick, and they were right. 

(Okay @Ratioyou can dumb me now)

Man took a break from Teaching every D2 Raid to answer this post. I like how must people in comments are people who were or are High Command or High Staff so they’ve dealt with Commander interviews/apps. Look at the past accepted and look at -1 to +1 on a lot guess what they don’t matter. The Interview is what actually matters. Best person possible can bomb the interview and not get it while a dumbass who is good at talking can. So bullshit it until you make it worked for 90% of the past commanders 

Edited May 18, 2025 by KillJoy

[KillJoy 566]

2 hours ago, Kurt said:

Old man here to add my 2 cents.

Yes, there has been bias in HC in the past. I'm sorry Conrad, but you were definitely the Golden Child back in the day. But that was the past not now. Granted I tend to stay away from the Drama of the server. To answer your question, I know the Directors and HC always look to improving and keeping the server alive. I've been on the back end of being rejected for a waive or losing a position to another player who they thought would be a better pick, and they were right. 

(Okay @Ratioyou can dumb me now)

Man took a break from Teaching every D2 Raid to answer this post. I like how must people in comments are people who were or are High Command or High Staff so they’ve dealt with Commander interviews/apps. Look at the past accepted and look at -1 to +1 on a lot guess what they don’t matter. The Interview is what actually matters. Best person possible can bomb the interview and not get it while a dumbass who is good at talking can. So bullshit it until you make it worked for 90% of the past commanders 

Edited May 18, 2025 by KillJoy

[Comics]

 

21 hours ago, Conrad said:

This is just favoritism

You were given major (effective BCMD) in 241st for free lmao

[Comics 1,638]

 

21 hours ago, Conrad said:

This is just favoritism

You were given major (effective BCMD) in 241st for free lmao

[Charles]

22 hours ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

 

[Charles 178]

22 hours ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

 

[blazin]

On 5/17/2025 at 8:04 PM, Eclipse said:

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

[blazin 308]

On 5/17/2025 at 8:04 PM, Eclipse said:

This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit
Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

[Funnyman]

40 minutes ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Congrats on the graduation big man. W reply

[Funnyman 203]

40 minutes ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Congrats on the graduation big man. W reply

[Finn]

2 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Big Synergy strikes again!!!11!2!211

 

Grats on graduating!!

[Finn 730]

2 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Big Synergy strikes again!!!11!2!211

 

Grats on graduating!!

[Mystic]

6 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Busy busy Blazin still making time for the forums. 

 

Congratulations. Long time from Barcelona to College Graduate

[Mystic 1,496]

6 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Busy busy Blazin still making time for the forums. 

 

Congratulations. Long time from Barcelona to College Graduate

[Brooklyn]

9 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

father came back with the milk to let out a banger take

[Brooklyn 1,214]

9 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

father came back with the milk to let out a banger take

[Brooklyn]

This will tell you all you need to know:

 

 

[Brooklyn 1,214]

This will tell you all you need to know:

 

 

[DirtyDanLIT]

11 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Bro finally returns to give a statement and still has to rep farm

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

11 hours ago, blazin said:

As the person who very openly biased Conrad up the 241st ranks at first this sums it up p well @Eclipse. Can't have it both ways. I understand being frustrated but at the end of the day directors have the ability to run the server as they see fit (for the most part). While those waive rules are in place and something that I worked on with HC a few months ago, if the director team wants to bypass them they can. I don't necessarily agree with how it was handled but again it was their call to make. The amount of reports I've gotten of people sitting in TS channels trying to force -1s is also just ridiculous. This to me just seems like a gigantic temper tantrum and the whole "Big Synergy" is out to get you mentality is genuinely dumb. To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus. Was a little late to this bc I just graduated from college and things have been a little hectic. 

Bro finally returns to give a statement and still has to rep farm

[Dennis]

On 5/17/2025 at 2:02 PM, Conrad said:

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

[Dennis 837]

On 5/17/2025 at 2:02 PM, Conrad said:

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

[Rizzo]

Posting this NOW when this has been a problem for years is crazy. Love you @Conrad but c'mon bud.
 

This has been a huge pet peeve of mine ever since the Dennis incident where he got almost all -1's and he got ACCEPTED for interview then ACCEPTED for Bacara. That was fucking wild. While I disagree with your reasoning for posting this, I agree with your argument. I think there needs to be more weight given to the communities +1/-1's but not enough to make a final decision. What that looks like I don't know, but there has to be something they can do to make the communities opinion more valuable. Maybe it changes the interview. Idk.
 

 

Had to mention the @Dennis incident now because he's right above me. Nobody tell him I mentioned this shit bro.

[Rizzo 132]

Posting this NOW when this has been a problem for years is crazy. Love you @Conrad but c'mon bud.
 

This has been a huge pet peeve of mine ever since the Dennis incident where he got almost all -1's and he got ACCEPTED for interview then ACCEPTED for Bacara. That was fucking wild. While I disagree with your reasoning for posting this, I agree with your argument. I think there needs to be more weight given to the communities +1/-1's but not enough to make a final decision. What that looks like I don't know, but there has to be something they can do to make the communities opinion more valuable. Maybe it changes the interview. Idk.
 

 

Had to mention the @Dennis incident now because he's right above me. Nobody tell him I mentioned this shit bro.

[BobbyBiceps]

No Comment

[BobbyBiceps 118]

No Comment

[Mystic]

5 hours ago, Dennis said:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

Gotta find the video

Edited May 20, 2025 by Mystic

[Mystic 1,496]

5 hours ago, Dennis said:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

Gotta find the video

Edited May 20, 2025 by Mystic

[shroud]

On 5/17/2025 at 1:32 PM, GregRocks said:

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

bro got 8 winners from this

what a dub

@Ratioi already know the dumb is coming so im @ing you

[shroud 174]

On 5/17/2025 at 1:32 PM, GregRocks said:

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep

bro got 8 winners from this

what a dub

@Ratioi already know the dumb is coming so im @ing you

[Pythin]

[Pythin 1,229]

[Charles]

50 minutes ago, Pythin said:

Conrad has been on a revenge arc since he got Tukk the first time around. 
Changing BCMD punishments was based af

[Charles 178]

50 minutes ago, Pythin said:

Conrad has been on a revenge arc since he got Tukk the first time around. 
Changing BCMD punishments was based af

[Marvel]

1 hour ago, Pythin said:

This is lowkey funny but I can’t give you rep because I don’t wanna feed your ego lil bro

[Marvel 3,308]

1 hour ago, Pythin said:

This is lowkey funny but I can’t give you rep because I don’t wanna feed your ego lil bro

[Crisp]

@shroud  @Boof  @ToasterBath  @Tomm  @Rizzo  @Tec  @BlueBeetle  @Joyboy  @Xaze  @blazin  @Slak  @Ollie_  @Clutch  @Mystic  @Super_  Chat help me formulate a response to this post

[Crisp 52]

@shroud  @Boof  @ToasterBath  @Tomm  @Rizzo  @Tec  @BlueBeetle  @Joyboy  @Xaze  @blazin  @Slak  @Ollie_  @Clutch  @Mystic  @Super_  Chat help me formulate a response to this post

[Pythin]

3 hours ago, Marvel said:

This is lowkey funny but I can’t give you rep because I don’t wanna feed your ego lil bro

[Pythin 1,229]

3 hours ago, Marvel said:

This is lowkey funny but I can’t give you rep because I don’t wanna feed your ego lil bro

[KillJoy]

18 hours ago, Dennis said:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

Damn y’all really ban this man after one posted damn that’s wild as fuck 

 

what rule was broken to result the ban 

Edited May 20, 2025 by KillJoy

[KillJoy 566]

18 hours ago, Dennis said:

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

Damn y’all really ban this man after one posted damn that’s wild as fuck 

 

what rule was broken to result the ban 

Edited May 20, 2025 by KillJoy

[Gears]

Im getting some strange dejavu here.

Let's be real, synergy is built off favouritism and the best example should be looking at blazins jedi order which was Head and shoulders above many others.

The truth is people only care about favouritism when it's the decision they don't want, otherwise they don't say shit. Hypocritical as fuck (and I'm projecting cause I'm guilty too)

Edited May 20, 2025 by Gears

[Gears 548]

Im getting some strange dejavu here.

Let's be real, synergy is built off favouritism and the best example should be looking at blazins jedi order which was Head and shoulders above many others.

The truth is people only care about favouritism when it's the decision they don't want, otherwise they don't say shit. Hypocritical as fuck (and I'm projecting cause I'm guilty too)

Edited May 20, 2025 by Gears

[Eclipse]

4 hours ago, KillJoy said:

what rule was broken to result the ban

 

Pretty sure he was community banned for credit duping like a year ago

[Eclipse 820]

4 hours ago, KillJoy said:

what rule was broken to result the ban

 

Pretty sure he was community banned for credit duping like a year ago

[Craigary]

On 5/17/2025 at 3:02 PM, Conrad said:

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

not reading that essay 

 

To be the candidate you don’t support 

Edited May 23, 2025 by Craigary

[Craigary 1,058]

On 5/17/2025 at 3:02 PM, Conrad said:

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?

Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?

Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin

Additional info:

not reading that essay 

 

To be the candidate you don’t support 

Edited May 23, 2025 by Craigary

[Vortexuss]

On 5/19/2025 at 10:23 AM, blazin said:

To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus.

To highlight the answer to this topic before closing. Here it is best said from Blazin

[Vortexuss 133]

On 5/19/2025 at 10:23 AM, blazin said:

To answer the original questions: Your votes matter and are taken into account but the director team and HC are sometimes going to make decisions that don't go w the general consensus.

To highlight the answer to this topic before closing. Here it is best said from Blazin

[Vortexuss]

Question Answered

[Vortexuss 133]

Question Answered