Zeros

5/5/5

5/5/5

+1 great candidate, didn't succumb to the curse

+1 based

It's been a damn pleasure working with you, whether it was in 501st or as Bad Batch together. BCMD didn't change you, despite popular belief, and you've been a great friend. o7 boss!

5/5/5 HERBES

+1, show 'em what you've got.

5/5/5 I wasn't there

+1 easiest vote of my life

+1, great guy and incredible candidate.

Considering how, out of personal experience, a suspended member is stripped of all in game ranks, TS tags, and roles removed from the discord, they are NOT a member of staff during their period. It's essentially removal for a short period. Your actions during this period are not representative of the staff team. This is useful information for the future of events and discussions but has only been clarified now, which is after the event was hosted and the rule was not changed/clarified at that point in time. In future cases though, there isn't an excuse for these actions!

The first half of this sentence directly contradicts the second half, with all due respect. A suspended staff member is not a member of staff for that period.

This was not what the event was. It was an intel grab on vital base systems such as BCC, ER, and THEN Brig. We originally entered as 21st/GM troopers and infiltrated the BCC, moved to armory and swapped to 212th, then we went to ER. Afterwards we PROPERLY rolled to find CG armor in the armory and then swapped to it, moving to brig. The armor for CG was chosen as it made the most sense for the area and also would've provided full base access. I'm not going to debate further on the contents of this event as it would be irrelevant to the discussion of Kaiser as BCMD/Cody.

From my recollection and from recently asking multiple of the EJs I remember being in it, nobody took their helmets off EXCEPT those on the commando models. Otherwise they kept their helmets on and used CIS weapons. Regardless, as I have stated, this evidence/event does not apply to Kaiser as a BCMD or VA. This was recently changed AFTER the event that regardless of weapon used, a helmet must be removed. However, no rules were broken as this new rule was implemented AFTER the event was hosted.

As you brought up and I quoted, this is not what the rule states. No rule was broken by this event and it STILL does not apply to Kaiser's actions as staff or BCMD. During that event, if we were going to engage, I directly informed the EJs that in order to fire back, they must use CIS weapons OR be swapped to the Commando model. In the terms of the GM rules and the exact rule you stated, no rule was broken by using the models. We did NOT use the jobs. This is...kind of the point of a Commando Droid event and proves the infiltration was successful.

As per the exact words, "Use of a battalion’s whitelist must be approved by an Commander+ in the battalion", my event did not violate this rule. Even if I did, which I did not because I used the available models on the server and not the whitelists for CG, this evidence still doesn't apply to Kaiser as it was my event and he had no influence over it as he was suspended at the time. As a BCMD, evidence from a job that does not apply to the conditions and terms Kaiser agreed to as a BCMD. If all of the actions presented were on 212th BCMD Cody, then they would be valid. HOWEVER: these are actions committed on another job that isn't even in the Republic side. If we followed this logic, I would get demoted on my 501st SGT for getting arrested on BH or Jedi. You cannot hold one person accountable from their actions on a different job. While you are allowed to view them differently, they would have broken no rules as a clone OR as a BCMD.

As I'm looking at these clips, a good chunk of these are actions on BH. While this applies to VA, yes, these clips have zero weight on him as a BCMD. The rules are already muddy and just shows him playing as a hostile figure on a different faction, which is obviously going to cause conflict with your battalion naturally. Because it wasn't his event. He wasn't even a VA/staff at the time, being on suspension at the time it was run. This was one of my events and is what I do for any commando event: use the accurate models in order to avoid metagaming. Why would you ask the battalion to use their models in order to be commandos, which maybe a few hours earlier from this event, had metagamed your EJs immediately and refused to drop it, then breaking NLR? I wish I had a clip of this but it wasn't exactly the best standard of "upholding rules" from your battalion. As the GM for it, it wasn't spite for being told to leave you alone I can assure that. It was more an experiment to see if the same metagaming incident would happen literally hours later and how to adapt to such cases in the future. This seems like a culmination of rising tensions between CG and 212th, and frankly the rest of the server. Are you sure you made this out of Kaiser's actions, or rather you grabbed evidence from whatever sources in order to make this report as an act of revenge? I'd also like to know more about these anonymous people you spoke to. I get the importance of privacy but how can we trust these people?

Name: zeros Who helped (If applicable): Link to Event/Encounter Document (optional): Description of event/encounter (required if no document provided): wonkers Did any Bounty Hunters Participate: Please rate using this scale Please Rate 1-5 on each of the below categories (5 being perfect, 1 being horrible) Gameplay: Care and Effort: Server Performance:

hour and 42 btw

5/5/5 I classify as a vehicle

4/5/5 I fucking hated this deployment but props for hosting one.

5/5/5, god i love it when events have speaking characters

4/2/2 FPS was pretty rough, /me escapes was a highlight. Otherwise, pretty fun!

+1, use this as a learning moment