Jump to content

Comics

Member
  • Posts

    1,515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Comics last won the day on January 13

Comics had the most liked content!

About Comics

Recent Profile Visitors

6,868 profile views

Comics's Achievements

Forum Troll

Forum Troll (4/7)

1.6k

Reputation

  1. -1, you will ask for these back in 3 months so why even bother. Also did Rahm not just recently receive a new model, why do you guys ask for these difficult models if you just remove them a couple months later?
  2. -1 this is an enormous task which would require a huge amount of dev work but extremely little pay off. Wear your big cloaks.
  3. Wow cancel culture comes for us all. Is anything sacred anymore?
  4. What happened to free speech & open debate? I thought synergy suppose to be different...
  5. But what will staff do once this is gone? +1
  6. Not seeing cloakers is not a real negative, you just wait for Omega or a jedi to show up of which they're basically always around. Also you cannot ensure it won't be abused in the future since rules are easily rewritten. Also you giving this job 7 slots that fucking insane. You lost the ghost company slots but you're absolutely still running it as a subunit just as it was before it got slots back. ARF is also a completely unused job in almost every battalion that is not a loss. -1, you guys have 2ndAC that's more than enough. You don't need this busted job
  7. One of my first friends i ever had was the first BCMD i had on Synergy, who really taught me how to enjoy the server with his radical and exuberant personality

     

    A gem of the community!

  8. HUGE fucking HUGE Regiment weapons in general should be way way better, it's kinda sad only seeing perma weapons. DC-15a is always a machine gun on screen, 15s is the standard rifle. Sad we'll never see it +1, great idea we need to use ingame stats way more for regiments and lore characters
  9. Wow guac cannot get anything right these days +1
  10. So maybe seek to change that current state for TU rather than giving up and replacing it with more ARC slots
  11. ?? Does it really do this? This seems to add a "lore" subunit where every character has a subunit (every other battalion has this) this is significantly less different than your current subunit just give the bubble shields to hill company if you want them. -1, I can't imagine this helps your position in the server at all except cementing you as the fanon battalion and we all know how Havoc Squad went
  12. so almost your entire battalion has regiments? Your basic trooper is already an ARF trooper, and no one sticks around to use that job. You don't need extra stuff for people who plan to leave that position every single time. Why would someone not want to join TU but then also want to be a specialised ARF trooper, which is exactly what TU is? Also what if you subunit suggestion gets denied, will you take this suggestion down? Also this suggestion would mean Rancor effectively gets to keep Trauma's unit without it being named that. You'd keep all the jobs and replace trauma with a new ARF HVY. This seems completely unfair for a battalion who already complains about not being able to sustain TU. These would be wasted job slots for people who always plan to leave for ARC.
  13. TU is, arguably, the most unique subunit on the server and should work well to flesh out choice in Rancor beyond being an ARC trooper. If you can't get that to work I have no idea why you think you'd be able to keep a 2nd arc sub unit alive. -1
  14. BTW you did not make it clear you want these to be ARF MED, ARF HVY, ARF MED. You do not need these extra slots for people who are gonna be these ranks for 2 weeks max. Just lower the perms to join trauma's unit, you have so much shit this is actually an insane ask icl. You could even do this exact suggestion by making trauma's unit the default job for RANCOR, gives you all those ARF jobs you want for enlisted (except HVY) -1 They have an ARF subunit also why would you join the ARC BATTALION if you didn't wanna be arc?
  15. Players shouldn't be forced to use a more cumbersome and inconvenient system if there is an alternative. We want to cut down on staff interactions as much as possible because it takes you out the game and out the moment. Staff quota shouldn't be in the way of a more seamless experience imo. We should try to cut out as many middlemen as possible
×
×
  • Create New...