Additionally, their are rules around waives that say you must be atleast a WO. Why was bana an exception?
This is just favoritism. Any other excuse is a lie. I have reported both directors to their superiors. You may close this if you wish, i have my answer.
So then what is the threshold? This app is -4 overall, with a TON of negative feedback from the battalion that he is applying for. So again, do our voices even matter?
Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position?
Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter?
Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin
Additional info:
+1 its basicaly unused. This will make it more appealing to the handful of whitelists that we have green lit for the tool to be added to as well. So its not just a buff for us!
-1, ARF definitely could use a boost, but just taking something from another group (ability to heal from medic, even if it is a unique premise) and putting it into the group will make MED weaker.
+1
People have always tried to make Trauma's unit a recon group, and we've seen how that has failed a couple times. Maybe a pivot to more marksmans focus will leave them with a stronger identity and role on the server.
@Kaner +1 generally, with the caveat that we’ve heard in other map suggestions things need to be given up in order to add stuff (map is at its limit of brush strokes, whatever that map word means). What will we be giving up for these additions?