Mekedrix Squad

[Arizona]

Name: Arizona 

RP Rank: BCMD

Suggestion: Mekedrix Squad addition

Implementation: Create new models and WLs for each squad member 

Lore: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Mekedrix

Workshop content if applicable: Require Development
(If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")

If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following if not, leave it out.

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: Commander Mekedrix 

Slots: 1

Description: Leader of Mekedrix Squad 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/bf4066b9ff30adb587a952a203a5a96d.png

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/0a9326f5b5ad64c8fed05f08a9857974.png






(Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons: 

DC-15a:  rw_sw_dc15a_o

DC-15s:   rw_sw_dc15s

Dual DC-17s: rw_sw_dual_dc17

Assault Rifle: (DEV) 

Range Finder:  (Approved by 104th)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)

A Knife Requires (DEV)

(If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE) , For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: Lieutenant Oron 

Slots: 1

Description: Support/Armorer of the squad 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/d6037c063fe229eb5b97214bd0d5d203.png



Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:

DC-15a:  rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:   rw_sw_dc15s
Assault Rifle: (DEV)
DC-17 Dual Pistols:     rw_sw_dual_dc17
F-187 Fusion Cutter:    alydus_fusioncutter
Range Finder: 104th approved  mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Fortification Tool: 241st approved (Zeros)  fort_datapad
Drop armor command/ability:  241st Armorer has this (Zeros)
Backpack support gear AOE:  (Allows friendlies in the AOE to get their weapon firing speed increased for 10 seconds, followed by half fire rate for 10 seconds) (DEV)
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other:(DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server 




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Jex (Medic)

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Medic 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/aa5c1ada25516407277f02a40c17979c.png





Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )
(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a: rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s: rw_sw_dc15s
Assault Rifle (DEV)
Dual DC-17s:  rw_sw_dual_dc17
Range Finder: (104th approved) mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Bacta Kit: weapon_bactakit
Medical Syringe: rust_syringe
Medical Scanner: sr_atmosphere_medical_scanner
Bacta Injector: sr_atmosphere_medical_injector
Healing gun: (R6 Doc med stim rapid fire) - (DEV)
Jump Pack: (DEV fuel modification needed)
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: Anything with (DEV) means it does not exist and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor. We would like that the model be given the bacta bandoleer and medic markings on the shoulder, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Kaelix 

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Heavy specialist 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/6b8e0cdb5da637fe72cd4f00bf802131.png





Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a:   rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:    rw_sw_dc15s
Z-6:  rw_sw_z6
Range Finder:  (Perms from Juggernaut)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
DC-17 Dual: Pistols  rw_sw_dual_dc17
RPS-6:  rw_sw_rps6
BF2 z-6 front mounted shield: (can overheat and needs a 20 second cooldown) (DEV)
(If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server subunit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor. We also would like the WL to have Body groupers that allow you to change what weapon is carried on the back of the model such as the z-6, DC-15a and a backpack. (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server  






-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Varek

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Infiltrator/Stealth marksman of the team 

Model: https://gyazo.com/ec79f6853ff51e2b9725d8c831a5d5d4




Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )
(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a: rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:  rw_sw_dc15s
Sniper: Capable of disabling jetpacks as well as doing normal sniper damage (DEV)
DC-17 Dual Pistols:    rw_sw_dual_dc17
Range Finder: (104th approved)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Cloak device:  sr_atmosphere_events_camouflage
Hologram Tool: (Approved by conrad)   synergy_hologram_tool
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.  
 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Arizona 151]

Name: Arizona 

RP Rank: BCMD

Suggestion: Mekedrix Squad addition

Implementation: Create new models and WLs for each squad member 

Lore: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Mekedrix

Workshop content if applicable: Require Development
(If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")

If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following if not, leave it out.

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: Commander Mekedrix 

Slots: 1

Description: Leader of Mekedrix Squad 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/bf4066b9ff30adb587a952a203a5a96d.png

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/0a9326f5b5ad64c8fed05f08a9857974.png






(Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons: 

DC-15a:  rw_sw_dc15a_o

DC-15s:   rw_sw_dc15s

Dual DC-17s: rw_sw_dual_dc17

Assault Rifle: (DEV) 

Range Finder:  (Approved by 104th)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)

A Knife Requires (DEV)

(If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE) , For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: Lieutenant Oron 

Slots: 1

Description: Support/Armorer of the squad 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/d6037c063fe229eb5b97214bd0d5d203.png



Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:

DC-15a:  rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:   rw_sw_dc15s
Assault Rifle: (DEV)
DC-17 Dual Pistols:     rw_sw_dual_dc17
F-187 Fusion Cutter:    alydus_fusioncutter
Range Finder: 104th approved  mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Fortification Tool: 241st approved (Zeros)  fort_datapad
Drop armor command/ability:  241st Armorer has this (Zeros)
Backpack support gear AOE:  (Allows friendlies in the AOE to get their weapon firing speed increased for 10 seconds, followed by half fire rate for 10 seconds) (DEV)
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other:(DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server 




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Jex (Medic)

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Medic 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/aa5c1ada25516407277f02a40c17979c.png





Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )
(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a: rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s: rw_sw_dc15s
Assault Rifle (DEV)
Dual DC-17s:  rw_sw_dual_dc17
Range Finder: (104th approved) mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Bacta Kit: weapon_bactakit
Medical Syringe: rust_syringe
Medical Scanner: sr_atmosphere_medical_scanner
Bacta Injector: sr_atmosphere_medical_injector
Healing gun: (R6 Doc med stim rapid fire) - (DEV)
Jump Pack: (DEV fuel modification needed)
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: Anything with (DEV) means it does not exist and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor. We would like that the model be given the bacta bandoleer and medic markings on the shoulder, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Kaelix 

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Heavy specialist 

Model: https://i.gyazo.com/6b8e0cdb5da637fe72cd4f00bf802131.png





Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )

(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a:   rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:    rw_sw_dc15s
Z-6:  rw_sw_z6
Range Finder:  (Perms from Juggernaut)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
DC-17 Dual: Pistols  rw_sw_dual_dc17
RPS-6:  rw_sw_rps6
BF2 z-6 front mounted shield: (can overheat and needs a 20 second cooldown) (DEV)
(If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server subunit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor. We also would like the WL to have Body groupers that allow you to change what weapon is carried on the back of the model such as the z-6, DC-15a and a backpack. (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server  






-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




 

Add or Change: Add
(Any job modification requires all this information)

Job: SGT Varek

Slots: 1

Description: Squad Infiltrator/Stealth marksman of the team 

Model: https://gyazo.com/ec79f6853ff51e2b9725d8c831a5d5d4




Include the models ^ with the hood and cloaks ONLY shown here:  )
(Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu)

Weapons:
DC-15a: rw_sw_dc15a_o
DC-15s:  rw_sw_dc15s
Sniper: Capable of disabling jetpacks as well as doing normal sniper damage (DEV)
DC-17 Dual Pistols:    rw_sw_dual_dc17
Range Finder: (104th approved)   mortar_range_finder (RANGE FINDER ONLY)
Cloak device:  sr_atmosphere_events_camouflage
Hologram Tool: (Approved by conrad)   synergy_hologram_tool
(If you want a modification to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu))

Other: (DEV) Means that the item is new and needs to be created, 212th’s server sub unit buff applies to this so the health and armor must be 400 HP 100 armor, (PLEASE APPLY LT ORON'S COLOR SCHEME TO ALL MODELS IN THIS SUGGESTION AND HAVE THE ORANGE FIT THE REST OF THE 212TH'S ORANGE), For kamas please do not use the ones depicted in the pictures and use the base kamas on the server.  
 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Charles]

+1 Unique, Never Seen and Therefore Would be an Amazing Addition for the Server! 

This is how you create suggestions that can impact the server and battalions! Be creative and do your research and enjoy it!

[Charles 178]

+1 Unique, Never Seen and Therefore Would be an Amazing Addition for the Server! 

This is how you create suggestions that can impact the server and battalions! Be creative and do your research and enjoy it!

[R2-Q5]

+ support 

[R2-Q5 2]

+ support 

[DirtyDanLIT]

So what is this replacing?

 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

So what is this replacing?

 

[BROPDROP]

+1 seems dope, is this gonna be like a new subunit or just a part of the main battalion?

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

So what is this replacing?

 

Yeah I didnt wanna be rude but I dont know maybe they removed the whole thing with only allowing a max of 2 subunits

[BROPDROP 395]

+1 seems dope, is this gonna be like a new subunit or just a part of the main battalion?

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

So what is this replacing?

 

Yeah I didnt wanna be rude but I dont know maybe they removed the whole thing with only allowing a max of 2 subunits

[Arizona]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

So what is this replacing?

 

nothing this is a new squad standardization is out the window and we're here to make some fun stuff happen 

 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona
oops

[Arizona 151]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

So what is this replacing?

 

nothing this is a new squad standardization is out the window and we're here to make some fun stuff happen 

 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona
oops

[Phillips311]

+1 pretty sick concept based on obscure 212th lore. Would be sick if these guys could get swords and those scoped pistols

Fits would be sick too

[Phillips311 1]

+1 pretty sick concept based on obscure 212th lore. Would be sick if these guys could get swords and those scoped pistols

Fits would be sick too

[DirtyDanLIT]

Just now, Arizona said:

nothing this is a new squad 

Alright different question now, is there an actual WL limit or is it just like a slight soft cap

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

Just now, Arizona said:

nothing this is a new squad 

Alright different question now, is there an actual WL limit or is it just like a slight soft cap

[Arizona]

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

Alright different question now, is there an actual WL limit or is it just like a slight soft cap

its a lore squad so there is only 1 WL per character 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Arizona 151]

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

Alright different question now, is there an actual WL limit or is it just like a slight soft cap

its a lore squad so there is only 1 WL per character 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[DirtyDanLIT]

Just now, Arizona said:

its a lore squad so there is only 1 WL per character 

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

Just now, Arizona said:

its a lore squad so there is only 1 WL per character 

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

[BROPDROP]

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

You know what that means if it just a soft cap 

[BROPDROP 395]

Just now, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

You know what that means if it just a soft cap 

[DirtyDanLIT]

Just now, BROPDROP said:

You know what that means if it just a soft cap 

Nah rather go with HOPE Squad @Pythin

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

Just now, BROPDROP said:

You know what that means if it just a soft cap 

Nah rather go with HOPE Squad @Pythin

[Arizona]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

We spoke to server leadership about our suggestion to make sure everything was within reason and we were never told of any WL cap. Maybe you guys asked when standardization was still a thing? But we were never told about a cap. 

[Arizona 151]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah I get that, I just was always under the impression that WL cap was like a heavily enforced thing. Especially with how often SOBDE was told we could never do a Walon Vau because of said cap. 

We spoke to server leadership about our suggestion to make sure everything was within reason and we were never told of any WL cap. Maybe you guys asked when standardization was still a thing? But we were never told about a cap. 

[BROPDROP]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah rather go with HOPE Squad @Pythin

[BROPDROP 395]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

Nah rather go with HOPE Squad @Pythin

[DirtyDanLIT]

2 minutes ago, Arizona said:

We spoke to server leadership about our suggestion to make sure everything was within reason and we were never told of any WL cap. Maybe you guys asked when standardization was still a thing? But we were never told about a cap. 

See this is the problem with @Danny

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

2 minutes ago, Arizona said:

We spoke to server leadership about our suggestion to make sure everything was within reason and we were never told of any WL cap. Maybe you guys asked when standardization was still a thing? But we were never told about a cap. 

See this is the problem with @Danny

[Arizona]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

See this is the problem with @Danny

We spoke with moose cuz danny was on LOA

 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Arizona 151]

1 minute ago, DirtyDanLIT said:

See this is the problem with @Danny

We spoke with moose cuz danny was on LOA

 

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[DirtyDanLIT]

1 minute ago, Arizona said:

We spoke with moose cuz danny was on LOA

 

This is the problem @Danny

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

1 minute ago, Arizona said:

We spoke with moose cuz danny was on LOA

 

This is the problem @Danny

[Finn]

+1 I love unique and new suggestions for the server!

[Finn 730]

+1 I love unique and new suggestions for the server!

[justuscloud5]

+1 pretty cool gamer move

[justuscloud5 518]

+1 pretty cool gamer move

[KnightVR]

+1 I love to see these additions to 212th and see how this unit performs. 

[KnightVR 140]

+1 I love to see these additions to 212th and see how this unit performs. 

[Conrad]

This is a funny April fools joke. 
+1 if you can’t get foxtrot back make your own I guess

Edited April 1, 2025 by Conrad

[Conrad 2,465]

This is a funny April fools joke. 
+1 if you can’t get foxtrot back make your own I guess

Edited April 1, 2025 by Conrad

[Zeros]

+1 

[Zeros 315]

+1 

[Wheezy]

+1 possibly change the model as that’s the spec or mech RCMD model (forget which) 

 

would also rather have foxtrot lmao but we all know that’s not happening so this is the next best thing I guess 

 

also is this like an actual lore squad or like it’s made up 

[Wheezy 80]

+1 possibly change the model as that’s the spec or mech RCMD model (forget which) 

 

would also rather have foxtrot lmao but we all know that’s not happening so this is the next best thing I guess 

 

also is this like an actual lore squad or like it’s made up 

[Arizona]

Just now, Wheezy said:

+1 possibly change the model as that’s the spec or mech RCMD model (forget which) 

 

would also rather have foxtrot lmao but we all know that’s not happening so this is the next best thing I guess 

 

also is this like an actual lore squad or like it’s made up 

The RCMD model depicted is just for the Hood and cloak model or just a reference for what we want as a body grouper. We don’t want the RCMD model itself there are screenshot links for the design of each character. 

 

Also yes this is a squad that is based in comic book lore However besides Oron and Mekedrix the other characters we took the liberty of creating ourselves (: 

[Arizona 151]

Just now, Wheezy said:

+1 possibly change the model as that’s the spec or mech RCMD model (forget which) 

 

would also rather have foxtrot lmao but we all know that’s not happening so this is the next best thing I guess 

 

also is this like an actual lore squad or like it’s made up 

The RCMD model depicted is just for the Hood and cloak model or just a reference for what we want as a body grouper. We don’t want the RCMD model itself there are screenshot links for the design of each character. 

 

Also yes this is a squad that is based in comic book lore However besides Oron and Mekedrix the other characters we took the liberty of creating ourselves (: 

[KaiserNeiner]

+1 oh boy do I sure love a subunit suggestion for 212th! 

 

@Rizzo

2 hours ago, Wheezy said:

would also rather have foxtrot lmao

 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

+1 oh boy do I sure love a subunit suggestion for 212th! 

 

@Rizzo

2 hours ago, Wheezy said:

would also rather have foxtrot lmao

 

[Pyro_Goobs03]

+1

[Pyro_Goobs03 1]

+1

[Funnyman]

At first I thought this was going to be a 212th RC suggestion. Needless to say it is not that and this is a peak suggestion. +1, but the heavy specialist getting both a z6 , z6 shield variant and an RPS seems a bit extreme.

[Funnyman 203]

At first I thought this was going to be a 212th RC suggestion. Needless to say it is not that and this is a peak suggestion. +1, but the heavy specialist getting both a z6 , z6 shield variant and an RPS seems a bit extreme.

[Arizona]

2 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

At first I thought this was going to be a 212th RC suggestion. Needless to say it is not that and this is a peak suggestion. +1, but the heavy specialist getting both a z6 , z6 shield variant and an RPS seems a bit extreme.

The shield on the z-6 isnt another gun its just the shield for the z-6. Thats his special ability not another gun. RPS-6 is a pretty rare weapon and we wanted this guy to FEEL like hes a heavy and use his weapons to anchor an objective. 

[Arizona 151]

2 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

At first I thought this was going to be a 212th RC suggestion. Needless to say it is not that and this is a peak suggestion. +1, but the heavy specialist getting both a z6 , z6 shield variant and an RPS seems a bit extreme.

The shield on the z-6 isnt another gun its just the shield for the z-6. Thats his special ability not another gun. RPS-6 is a pretty rare weapon and we wanted this guy to FEEL like hes a heavy and use his weapons to anchor an objective. 

[Funnyman]

Just now, Arizona said:

The shield on the z-6 isnt another gun its just the shield for the z-6. Thats his special ability not another gun. RPS-6 is a pretty rare weapon and we wanted this guy to FEEL like hes a heavy and use his weapons to anchor an objective. 

Seems pretty chill. Question is will he take an HVO slot like other LC that have an RPS?

[Funnyman 203]

Just now, Arizona said:

The shield on the z-6 isnt another gun its just the shield for the z-6. Thats his special ability not another gun. RPS-6 is a pretty rare weapon and we wanted this guy to FEEL like hes a heavy and use his weapons to anchor an objective. 

Seems pretty chill. Question is will he take an HVO slot like other LC that have an RPS?

[Arizona]

1 minute ago, Funnyman said:

Seems pretty chill. Question is will he take an HVO slot like other LC that have an RPS?

We don't want to be the guys that are trying to be special here so yes he would take up a slot seeing as our HVOs don't get used up that often anyway we will count him as one.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Arizona 151]

1 minute ago, Funnyman said:

Seems pretty chill. Question is will he take an HVO slot like other LC that have an RPS?

We don't want to be the guys that are trying to be special here so yes he would take up a slot seeing as our HVOs don't get used up that often anyway we will count him as one.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Arizona

[Gobo The Great]

+1

[Gobo The Great 49]

+1

[KillJoy]

+1 Thank god the age of standardization is over. 

[KillJoy 566]

+1 Thank god the age of standardization is over. 

[Jayarr]

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

[Jayarr 1,037]

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

[Funnyman]

10 minutes ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

unrelated to this suggestion, if there were to, at some point in the future, be a suggestion to add a squad to SOBDE, would one have to be removed as a trade for the new one?

[Funnyman 203]

10 minutes ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

unrelated to this suggestion, if there were to, at some point in the future, be a suggestion to add a squad to SOBDE, would one have to be removed as a trade for the new one?

[Upset Saint]

+1 for a new company but only if it will not remove anything 

[Upset Saint 91]

+1 for a new company but only if it will not remove anything 

[Funnyman]

2 minutes ago, C0GH4T said:

+1 for a new company but only if it will not remove anything 

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

2 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Funnyman

[Funnyman 203]

2 minutes ago, C0GH4T said:

+1 for a new company but only if it will not remove anything 

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

2 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Funnyman

[Upset Saint]

1 minute ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

I know but we will see if the developers decide if they want to or no so it is mostly on the development team since they can deny it or approve it even though you +1 the suggestion.

[Upset Saint 91]

1 minute ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

I know but we will see if the developers decide if they want to or no so it is mostly on the development team since they can deny it or approve it even though you +1 the suggestion.

[Charles]

2 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

Everyone suggest another subunit 

[Charles 178]

2 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

Everyone suggest another subunit 

[Funnyman]

Just now, Charles said:

Everyone suggest another subunit 

im suggesting ion squad

[Funnyman 203]

Just now, Charles said:

Everyone suggest another subunit 

im suggesting ion squad

[Arizona]

8 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

[Arizona 151]

8 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

bro it like is a requirement that it replaces something. there is no world rn where this gets added and 212th doesnt have to remove a subunit

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

[Funnyman]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

 

3 minutes ago, Arizona said:

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

words of jayarr not me

[Funnyman 203]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

 

3 minutes ago, Arizona said:

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

words of jayarr not me

[Upset Saint]

Just now, Arizona said:

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

If you want a 3 squad (company) then all the other battalions will want them as well so it will be a problem on the side of developers and the battalion for it being filled. One thing the development team could try is for you to have it for 3 months and if all roles will be filled then you could keep it if not it will be removed

[Upset Saint 91]

Just now, Arizona said:

why not? Whats the point of no standardization if things still have to be standardized what logic is that?

If you want a 3 squad (company) then all the other battalions will want them as well so it will be a problem on the side of developers and the battalion for it being filled. One thing the development team could try is for you to have it for 3 months and if all roles will be filled then you could keep it if not it will be removed

[Finn]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

I was under the impression that the server was moving away from battalion standardization. I was also under the impression that a third subunit was ok to have. Can you give some explanation on the policy shift?

[Finn 730]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

I was under the impression that the server was moving away from battalion standardization. I was also under the impression that a third subunit was ok to have. Can you give some explanation on the policy shift?

[Upset Saint]

One thing I wanted to ask is what will the squad specialize in?

Edited April 1, 2025 by C0GH4T

[Upset Saint 91]

One thing I wanted to ask is what will the squad specialize in?

Edited April 1, 2025 by C0GH4T

[Mystic]

22 minutes ago, Finn said:

I was under the impression that the server was moving away from battalion standardization. I was also under the impression that a third subunit was ok to have. Can you give some explanation on the policy shift?

As Jayarr stated, the "impression" of standardization being removed applied to whitelist caps, uniqueness, and how far Development is willing to play into the communities hands with their creative ideas, since we now have the man power to consistently deliver unique things to make each battalion appealing. 

It was stated at the TS Meeting and even a few other times during things like the Q&As/passing conversation, that for the sake of developers times, keeping things fair, and to prevent one battalion being way too population dense compared to others, that sub-units were capped at 2 per battalion.  Some battalions struggle to keep their main battalion alive, adding a 3rd squad to each battalion just adds more competition for that struggling battalion, plus the issues of battalions becoming too alike, if each battalion has a specialized squad, conflicts of interest for each squad will start to happen more often resulting in priority issues, and overall just making it less fun to be lower on that priority scale, which is why we encourage people to make their current sub-units/battalions special, instead of creating another one.

TL;DR 

Yes. The norm is no longer. but some things need to be capped for the betterment of server/battalion health.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Mystic

[Mystic 1,496]

22 minutes ago, Finn said:

I was under the impression that the server was moving away from battalion standardization. I was also under the impression that a third subunit was ok to have. Can you give some explanation on the policy shift?

As Jayarr stated, the "impression" of standardization being removed applied to whitelist caps, uniqueness, and how far Development is willing to play into the communities hands with their creative ideas, since we now have the man power to consistently deliver unique things to make each battalion appealing. 

It was stated at the TS Meeting and even a few other times during things like the Q&As/passing conversation, that for the sake of developers times, keeping things fair, and to prevent one battalion being way too population dense compared to others, that sub-units were capped at 2 per battalion.  Some battalions struggle to keep their main battalion alive, adding a 3rd squad to each battalion just adds more competition for that struggling battalion, plus the issues of battalions becoming too alike, if each battalion has a specialized squad, conflicts of interest for each squad will start to happen more often resulting in priority issues, and overall just making it less fun to be lower on that priority scale, which is why we encourage people to make their current sub-units/battalions special, instead of creating another one.

TL;DR 

Yes. The norm is no longer. but some things need to be capped for the betterment of server/battalion health.

Edited April 1, 2025 by Mystic

[Finn]

7 minutes ago, Mystic said:

As Jayarr stated, the "impression" of standardization being removed applied to whitelist caps, uniqueness, and how far Development is willing to play into the communities hands with their creative ideas, since we now have the man power to consistently deliver unique things to make each battalion appealing. 

It was stated at the TS Meeting and even a few other times during things like the Q&As/passing conversation, that for the sake of developers times, keeping things fair, and to prevent one battalion being way too population dense compared to others, that sub-units were capped at 2 per battalion.  Some battalions struggle to keep their main battalion alive, adding a 3rd squad to each battalion just adds more competition for that struggling battalion, plus the issues of battalions becoming too alike, if each battalion has a specialized squad, conflicts of interest for each squad will start to happen more often resulting in priority issues, and overall just making it less fun to be lower on that priority scale, which is why we encourage people to make their current sub-units/battalions special, instead of creating another one.

TL;DR 

Yes. The norm is no longer. but some things need to be capped for the betterment of server/battalion health.

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

[Finn 730]

7 minutes ago, Mystic said:

As Jayarr stated, the "impression" of standardization being removed applied to whitelist caps, uniqueness, and how far Development is willing to play into the communities hands with their creative ideas, since we now have the man power to consistently deliver unique things to make each battalion appealing. 

It was stated at the TS Meeting and even a few other times during things like the Q&As/passing conversation, that for the sake of developers times, keeping things fair, and to prevent one battalion being way too population dense compared to others, that sub-units were capped at 2 per battalion.  Some battalions struggle to keep their main battalion alive, adding a 3rd squad to each battalion just adds more competition for that struggling battalion, plus the issues of battalions becoming too alike, if each battalion has a specialized squad, conflicts of interest for each squad will start to happen more often resulting in priority issues, and overall just making it less fun to be lower on that priority scale, which is why we encourage people to make their current sub-units/battalions special, instead of creating another one.

TL;DR 

Yes. The norm is no longer. but some things need to be capped for the betterment of server/battalion health.

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

[Doc]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

 

1 minute ago, Finn said:

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

 

[Doc 98]

3 hours ago, Jayarr said:

If this is to be added, you will have to remove one of your other subunits. We will not be going above the set number of two subunits, for various reasons.
We discussed this in our teamspeak meeting, and I mentioned that it is a more likely outcome that you will have to cut something off to add this.

 

1 minute ago, Finn said:

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

 

[Banagite]

What is a Mekedrix, Also no third subunit. -1

Edited April 2, 2025 by Banagite

[Banagite 140]

What is a Mekedrix, Also no third subunit. -1

Edited April 2, 2025 by Banagite

[WarMaster]

Just now, Banagite said:

What is a Mekedrix, Also -1

Mamba?

[WarMaster 195]

Just now, Banagite said:

What is a Mekedrix, Also -1

Mamba?

[Charles]

4 minutes ago, Banagite said:

What is a Mekedrix, Also no third subunit. -1

It's called lore... 212th has extensive lore. 

[Charles 178]

4 minutes ago, Banagite said:

What is a Mekedrix, Also no third subunit. -1

It's called lore... 212th has extensive lore. 

[Funnyman]

oh so these guys aint even clones

[Funnyman 203]

oh so these guys aint even clones

[meli]

6 minutes ago, Finn said:

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

"Chance" indicates that it isn't 100% definite that whatever is going to be discussed is going to be followed through. This is, unfortunately, one of those times and we have to bear the bad news after further consideration amongst the team. It wouldn't have been discussed with you if there wasn't an opportunity to be possible, however after further discussions and consideration it's clear that the higher dev team have decided on maintaining sub-unit cap at two. 

 

I can understand the disappointment, however the reasons behind this choice are justifiable. 

[meli 6]

6 minutes ago, Finn said:

This is not what Jayarr told us 2 weeks ago when we talked.  When we talked, it was stated that there was a chance we might have to remove a subunit, but that it was likely a compromise could be made in what we remove in order for this to be added. I'm confused why we were led to believe there was a chance we wouldn't be forced to remove a subunit if that was the existing policy.

"Chance" indicates that it isn't 100% definite that whatever is going to be discussed is going to be followed through. This is, unfortunately, one of those times and we have to bear the bad news after further consideration amongst the team. It wouldn't have been discussed with you if there wasn't an opportunity to be possible, however after further discussions and consideration it's clear that the higher dev team have decided on maintaining sub-unit cap at two. 

 

I can understand the disappointment, however the reasons behind this choice are justifiable. 

[Juggernaut]

Pretty sure this is the HELMET WE ASKED FOR DIRE SQUAD and instead got forced 2nd AC helmet or the Engineer instead but Yeah I dunno dude good luck though

 

[Juggernaut 121]

Pretty sure this is the HELMET WE ASKED FOR DIRE SQUAD and instead got forced 2nd AC helmet or the Engineer instead but Yeah I dunno dude good luck though

 

[Brooklyn]

I like the kits ideas. But humans in a clone battalion? Lore or not I don't think this is better than ghost company. Why not get these kits for GC? -1 humans +1 kits

[Brooklyn 1,214]

I like the kits ideas. But humans in a clone battalion? Lore or not I don't think this is better than ghost company. Why not get these kits for GC? -1 humans +1 kits

[Arizona]

6 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

I like the kits ideas. But humans in a clone battalion? Lore or not I don't think this is better than ghost company. Why not get these kits for GC? -1 humans +1 kits

GC already has really good kits no one will allow GC to get these kits they already have a lot. 

[Arizona 151]

6 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

I like the kits ideas. But humans in a clone battalion? Lore or not I don't think this is better than ghost company. Why not get these kits for GC? -1 humans +1 kits

GC already has really good kits no one will allow GC to get these kits they already have a lot. 

[Brooklyn]

Just now, Arizona said:

GC already has really good kits no one will allow GC to get these kits they already have a lot. 

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

[Brooklyn 1,214]

Just now, Arizona said:

GC already has really good kits no one will allow GC to get these kits they already have a lot. 

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

[Arizona]

Just now, Brooklyn said:

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

We got GC medics, They now have DC-15x's, Deployable drone for all GC, Shotguns, DP 24 SMGs aswell as the 400-100 212th sub unit buff 

[Arizona 151]

Just now, Brooklyn said:

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

We got GC medics, They now have DC-15x's, Deployable drone for all GC, Shotguns, DP 24 SMGs aswell as the 400-100 212th sub unit buff 

[Charles]

9 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

Along with that.. one of the main reasons why these kits are.. very impressive is because we wanted to expand on what we have, whether it’s legends diving or just unused canon lore..

[Charles 178]

9 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

Just cause I dont know, can you tell me the GC kits?

 

Along with that.. one of the main reasons why these kits are.. very impressive is because we wanted to expand on what we have, whether it’s legends diving or just unused canon lore..

[Marvel]

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

Edited April 2, 2025 by Marvel

[Marvel 3,308]

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

Edited April 2, 2025 by Marvel

[Brooklyn]

I feel as though there is a fine line between getting more for your battalion, "expanding" if you will, and potentially causing detriment to other battalions. This is no fault of 212th, being burdened with creativity is one hell of a thing to have, but many battalions lack that. My eventual concern is when everyone starts going to 212th, like it was for about 6-7 months last year. To be fair, this is VERY MUCH a "skill issue" for other battalions to get the gears grinding and think of stuff, but until they beef up a bit, i think the server would benefit overall from 212th not getting a 3rd unit. I only finished half of a conversation with arizona a few minutes ago, but if GC has too much to get these kits, y'all already have 2ndac / parjai if you REALLY wanna get deep, which is a self imposed jetpack restriction if i am not wrong? If so correct me. AND trying to get the desert camo model on GC too? I think y'all are chilling. The thing is, it is never enough. There is never a last suggestion. I could name 5 suggestions that are copy and paste from times before.

212th already has a massive community behind it, finn as well. In a lot of the server's eyes y'all have been envied for a long time. I'd be proud of that and keep doing what you're doing. Focus on refining your battalion jobs. Like the deset camo on GC. Find things to min max those jobs. Y'all already have the most in my eyes. The most in where it counts. This isn't a vote, more of just advice. Do with it what you will.

[Brooklyn 1,214]

I feel as though there is a fine line between getting more for your battalion, "expanding" if you will, and potentially causing detriment to other battalions. This is no fault of 212th, being burdened with creativity is one hell of a thing to have, but many battalions lack that. My eventual concern is when everyone starts going to 212th, like it was for about 6-7 months last year. To be fair, this is VERY MUCH a "skill issue" for other battalions to get the gears grinding and think of stuff, but until they beef up a bit, i think the server would benefit overall from 212th not getting a 3rd unit. I only finished half of a conversation with arizona a few minutes ago, but if GC has too much to get these kits, y'all already have 2ndac / parjai if you REALLY wanna get deep, which is a self imposed jetpack restriction if i am not wrong? If so correct me. AND trying to get the desert camo model on GC too? I think y'all are chilling. The thing is, it is never enough. There is never a last suggestion. I could name 5 suggestions that are copy and paste from times before.

212th already has a massive community behind it, finn as well. In a lot of the server's eyes y'all have been envied for a long time. I'd be proud of that and keep doing what you're doing. Focus on refining your battalion jobs. Like the deset camo on GC. Find things to min max those jobs. Y'all already have the most in my eyes. The most in where it counts. This isn't a vote, more of just advice. Do with it what you will.

[Arizona]

21 minutes ago, Marvel said:

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

This entire explanation is exactly what we were told to stay away from. 

New stuff is what’s wanted not constantly rebalancing of the same old stuff for every update. Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

[Arizona 151]

21 minutes ago, Marvel said:

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

This entire explanation is exactly what we were told to stay away from. 

New stuff is what’s wanted not constantly rebalancing of the same old stuff for every update. Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

[Charles]

36 minutes ago, Marvel said:

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

Which battalions don’t have two subunits? Only one that comes to mind is 241st and that’s.. obvious.

 

212th - 2ndAC  and Ghost Company

501st - Torrent and 332nd

104th - Wolfpack and Dire Squad

41st - Green Company and Improcco

CG - DS and Trackers

Rancor - Alpha and Trauma

It’s definitely not an issue of the number, it’s the utilization and running it issue that people seem to have cross over their heads. I know that as Fox it was difficult to utilize Tracker in a way that advances them (Recon is dead), so I wanted to try something else.. (Thire Squad or Outer Rim Garrison)
 

Also with this new squad.. we’d remove jobs to not have a “bloat”. We are 100% willing to do this.

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Charles

[Charles 178]

36 minutes ago, Marvel said:

-1

This is the perfect example of bloat! 3 subunits is too many especially when so many battalions still don’t even have two. (Which not everyone needs two but absolutely nobody needs THREE)

Also these kits could easily be incorporated into one of your other two subunits. Replace basic ass jobs like HVY or ARF with actual unique jobs making your subunits unique. Both of your subunits as far as I know are one trick ponies. 2ndAC have jetpacks, GC has the drone now. 

These unique kit ideas could easily make your subunits even more unique. Mix and match standard kits like I’m positive nobody is dying to be a Ghost Company Heavy. Switch things around and find a balance rather than just adding onto the bloat.

Which battalions don’t have two subunits? Only one that comes to mind is 241st and that’s.. obvious.

 

212th - 2ndAC  and Ghost Company

501st - Torrent and 332nd

104th - Wolfpack and Dire Squad

41st - Green Company and Improcco

CG - DS and Trackers

Rancor - Alpha and Trauma

It’s definitely not an issue of the number, it’s the utilization and running it issue that people seem to have cross over their heads. I know that as Fox it was difficult to utilize Tracker in a way that advances them (Recon is dead), so I wanted to try something else.. (Thire Squad or Outer Rim Garrison)
 

Also with this new squad.. we’d remove jobs to not have a “bloat”. We are 100% willing to do this.

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Charles

[Marvel]

3 minutes ago, Arizona said:

This entire explanation is exactly what we were told to stay away from. 

New stuff is what’s wanted not constantly rebalancing of the same old stuff for every update. Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

Idk who said that but I disagree. Synergy has gone years without anything being refined or properly balanced and that’s what shows. Everything should be retuned first before throwing more shit into the pile. I agree things don’t need to be rebalanced every update but that would also require stuff to be balanced to begin with which we are far from that.

Also new things being added for the sake of something new get stale and die off fast. For example similar units added for similar reasons like Trauma’s Unit, Dire Squad, The Militia, Devil Dogs, and so many more examples over the years have proven this sentiment is not true whatsoever. 

Not to mention the extremely obscure lore of this unit. I don’t see a future where this unit out performs 2ndAC or GC other than the first month or so of its life span. 

Then we’re right back at square one with suggestions to either remove, rebalance, or completely change this unit. I can already see the “Swap Mandarin Squad for Foxtrot” suggestion a year from now.

[Marvel 3,308]

3 minutes ago, Arizona said:

This entire explanation is exactly what we were told to stay away from. 

New stuff is what’s wanted not constantly rebalancing of the same old stuff for every update. Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

Idk who said that but I disagree. Synergy has gone years without anything being refined or properly balanced and that’s what shows. Everything should be retuned first before throwing more shit into the pile. I agree things don’t need to be rebalanced every update but that would also require stuff to be balanced to begin with which we are far from that.

Also new things being added for the sake of something new get stale and die off fast. For example similar units added for similar reasons like Trauma’s Unit, Dire Squad, The Militia, Devil Dogs, and so many more examples over the years have proven this sentiment is not true whatsoever. 

Not to mention the extremely obscure lore of this unit. I don’t see a future where this unit out performs 2ndAC or GC other than the first month or so of its life span. 

Then we’re right back at square one with suggestions to either remove, rebalance, or completely change this unit. I can already see the “Swap Mandarin Squad for Foxtrot” suggestion a year from now.

[Marvel]

1 minute ago, Charles said:

Which battalions don’t have two subunits? Only one that comes to mind is 241st and that’s.. obvious.

 

212th - 2ndAC  and Ghost Company

501st - Torrent and 332nd

104th - Wolfpack and Dire Squad

41st - Green Company and Improcco

CG - DS and Trackers

Rancor - Alpha and Trauma

It’s definitely not an issue of the number, it’s the utilization and running it issue that people seem to have cross over their heads. 
 

Also with this new squad.. we’d remove jobs to not have a “bloat”. We are 100% willing to do this.

 

I forget half of these because they’re so forgettable and most of them don’t perform well. My entire stance is the numbers. In a perfect world battalions would have one subunit that was entirely unique from their main unit rather than copy and pasted standard jobs. Most battalions have proven that two subunits struggle to find a balance between themselves and the main unit. 212th has been the only exception for the most part but yall are just playing with fire by adding another because eventually yall are gonna be in the same boat as everyone else struggling to maintain all of your units and keeping them healthy for more than a few weeks at a time.

Also removing jobs to avoid bloat… like why not replace jobs you already have in the subunits you already have with these unique jobs? Why would yall be willing to take away from your existing units in favor of this random ass goofy squad? Doesn’t make much sense to me. 

[Marvel 3,308]

1 minute ago, Charles said:

Which battalions don’t have two subunits? Only one that comes to mind is 241st and that’s.. obvious.

 

212th - 2ndAC  and Ghost Company

501st - Torrent and 332nd

104th - Wolfpack and Dire Squad

41st - Green Company and Improcco

CG - DS and Trackers

Rancor - Alpha and Trauma

It’s definitely not an issue of the number, it’s the utilization and running it issue that people seem to have cross over their heads. 
 

Also with this new squad.. we’d remove jobs to not have a “bloat”. We are 100% willing to do this.

 

I forget half of these because they’re so forgettable and most of them don’t perform well. My entire stance is the numbers. In a perfect world battalions would have one subunit that was entirely unique from their main unit rather than copy and pasted standard jobs. Most battalions have proven that two subunits struggle to find a balance between themselves and the main unit. 212th has been the only exception for the most part but yall are just playing with fire by adding another because eventually yall are gonna be in the same boat as everyone else struggling to maintain all of your units and keeping them healthy for more than a few weeks at a time.

Also removing jobs to avoid bloat… like why not replace jobs you already have in the subunits you already have with these unique jobs? Why would yall be willing to take away from your existing units in favor of this random ass goofy squad? Doesn’t make much sense to me. 

[Charles]

7 minutes ago, Marvel said:

I forget half of these because they’re so forgettable and most of them don’t perform well. My entire stance is the numbers. In a perfect world battalions would have one subunit that was entirely unique from their main unit rather than copy and pasted standard jobs. Most battalions have proven that two subunits struggle to find a balance between themselves and the main unit. 212th has been the only exception for the most part but yall are just playing with fire by adding another because eventually yall are gonna be in the same boat as everyone else struggling to maintain all of your units and keeping them healthy for more than a few weeks at a time.

Also removing jobs to avoid bloat… like why not replace jobs you already have in the subunits you already have with these unique jobs? Why would yall be willing to take away from your existing units in favor of this random ass goofy squad? Doesn’t make much sense to me. 

I mean the uniqueness of these jobs are based around the models and kits. Other than that, what we’re asking for is already on the server. 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Charles

[Charles 178]

7 minutes ago, Marvel said:

I forget half of these because they’re so forgettable and most of them don’t perform well. My entire stance is the numbers. In a perfect world battalions would have one subunit that was entirely unique from their main unit rather than copy and pasted standard jobs. Most battalions have proven that two subunits struggle to find a balance between themselves and the main unit. 212th has been the only exception for the most part but yall are just playing with fire by adding another because eventually yall are gonna be in the same boat as everyone else struggling to maintain all of your units and keeping them healthy for more than a few weeks at a time.

Also removing jobs to avoid bloat… like why not replace jobs you already have in the subunits you already have with these unique jobs? Why would yall be willing to take away from your existing units in favor of this random ass goofy squad? Doesn’t make much sense to me. 

I mean the uniqueness of these jobs are based around the models and kits. Other than that, what we’re asking for is already on the server. 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Charles

[Marvel]

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

[Marvel 3,308]

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

[Brooklyn]

5 minutes ago, Marvel said:

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

Words cannot express how long I just laughed reading this

[Brooklyn 1,214]

5 minutes ago, Marvel said:

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

Words cannot express how long I just laughed reading this

[KaiserNeiner]

33 minutes ago, Marvel said:

 I can already see the “Swap Mandarin Squad for Foxtrot” suggestion a year from now.

Wait this is a really good idea +1

[KaiserNeiner 0]

33 minutes ago, Marvel said:

 I can already see the “Swap Mandarin Squad for Foxtrot” suggestion a year from now.

Wait this is a really good idea +1

[Guac]

1 hour ago, Arizona said:

Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

[Guac 573]

1 hour ago, Arizona said:

Synergy is the stale server out of the big 3 SWRP servers and it shows. If there is a desire for new stuff then this should be it.

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

[blazin]

4 minutes ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

[blazin 308]

4 minutes ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

[Charles]

1 hour ago, Marvel said:

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

At least someone read the lore... @Banagite

[Charles 178]

1 hour ago, Marvel said:

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

At least someone read the lore... @Banagite

[Arizona]

1 hour ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

My bad i forgot the truth is not something we’re allowed to say. 

2 hours ago, Marvel said:

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

exactly why we’re not asking for that edgy fuckery

[Arizona 151]

1 hour ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

My bad i forgot the truth is not something we’re allowed to say. 

2 hours ago, Marvel said:

I’m sorry but reading the lore on these guys… what in the absolute edge lord is this 😭😭😭

 

 

"This sword was made from the bones of a clone trooper. Why let such a prime agent of death rot and waste away?"

―Mekedrix^[1]

Mekedrix wielded a sword created from the bones of a clone trooper.^[1]

This shit got 2018 Marvel jumping up and down holy moly

In the entirety of the 212th’s lore there has to be so many better options than this. I think… I think I’d actually prefer Foxtrot and I’m an avid foxtrot hater.

exactly why we’re not asking for that edgy fuckery

[Comics]

-1, this quote from the commander says it all
"War is just a distraction. A hypocritical game that denies its own real goal. The goal of our entire existence. Annihilation. […] I've finally found the "light" you claim to follow. It is a void. An eventuality, pulling us all inside it. Clones are created to serve death. The Confederacy rips apart the galaxy unwittingly in the service of death. Even you Jedi…your uncanny power… You call it the Force, but it is the death wind. The strength of the void itself."

―Mekedrix explains his philosophy

Edited April 2, 2025 by Comics

[Comics 1,638]

-1, this quote from the commander says it all
"War is just a distraction. A hypocritical game that denies its own real goal. The goal of our entire existence. Annihilation. […] I've finally found the "light" you claim to follow. It is a void. An eventuality, pulling us all inside it. Clones are created to serve death. The Confederacy rips apart the galaxy unwittingly in the service of death. Even you Jedi…your uncanny power… You call it the Force, but it is the death wind. The strength of the void itself."

―Mekedrix explains his philosophy

Edited April 2, 2025 by Comics

[Brooklyn]

22 minutes ago, Arizona said:

My bad i forgot the truth is not something we’re allowed to say. 

I'm sure the devs would rather hear why you think it's stale with evidence to back it so the community can collectively think of ways to change it, but calling it out on a post them getting defensive for a well warranted response ain't the way to go

[Brooklyn 1,214]

22 minutes ago, Arizona said:

My bad i forgot the truth is not something we’re allowed to say. 

I'm sure the devs would rather hear why you think it's stale with evidence to back it so the community can collectively think of ways to change it, but calling it out on a post them getting defensive for a well warranted response ain't the way to go

[Charles]

31 minutes ago, Comics said:

-1, this quote from the commander says it all
"War is just a distraction. A hypocritical game that denies its own real goal. The goal of our entire existence. Annihilation. […] I've finally found the "light" you claim to follow. It is a void. An eventuality, pulling us all inside it. Clones are created to serve death. The Confederacy rips apart the galaxy unwittingly in the service of death. Even you Jedi…your uncanny power… You call it the Force, but it is the death wind. The strength of the void itself."

―Mekedrix explains his philosophy

Cool. You read into Star Wars Legends that has edgy personalities.. We have several lore characters with that trait.. how is this different?

[Charles 178]

31 minutes ago, Comics said:

-1, this quote from the commander says it all
"War is just a distraction. A hypocritical game that denies its own real goal. The goal of our entire existence. Annihilation. […] I've finally found the "light" you claim to follow. It is a void. An eventuality, pulling us all inside it. Clones are created to serve death. The Confederacy rips apart the galaxy unwittingly in the service of death. Even you Jedi…your uncanny power… You call it the Force, but it is the death wind. The strength of the void itself."

―Mekedrix explains his philosophy

Cool. You read into Star Wars Legends that has edgy personalities.. We have several lore characters with that trait.. how is this different?

[Arizona]

1 hour ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

Look. I've been informed that my statement about the development of the server didn't convey what I'm really trying to get across because I was on my phone. Everyone appreciates what the devs do for the server and myself included and it was not my intent to "take a shot" at the dev team in any way. My intent was to just explain how I feel as a player in the community looking at how suggestions are looked at and decided. I feel as if the server is too conservative with how things are allowed to move forward. That is not a dig at the dev team at all and it wasn't my intention to make it sound like it was but more of a frustration with the mentality of what's worth doing and not doing.  

[Arizona 151]

1 hour ago, Guac said:

This is the type of statement that gets (largely volunteer) devs on your side, and excited to take on a project! This won’t be recalled when 212th tries to make a suggestion in the future!

Look. I've been informed that my statement about the development of the server didn't convey what I'm really trying to get across because I was on my phone. Everyone appreciates what the devs do for the server and myself included and it was not my intent to "take a shot" at the dev team in any way. My intent was to just explain how I feel as a player in the community looking at how suggestions are looked at and decided. I feel as if the server is too conservative with how things are allowed to move forward. That is not a dig at the dev team at all and it wasn't my intention to make it sound like it was but more of a frustration with the mentality of what's worth doing and not doing.  

[blazin]

I’ve heard enough, -1 improcco jetpacks 

[blazin 308]

I’ve heard enough, -1 improcco jetpacks 

[Juggernaut]

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad 
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Juggernaut
added proof of the request

[Juggernaut 121]

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad 
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Juggernaut
added proof of the request

[Abel, not Cain]

19 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad -1
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

I stand corrected, you are right

Edited April 2, 2025 by Abel, not Cain
I missread

[Abel, not Cain 219]

19 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad -1
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

I stand corrected, you are right

Edited April 2, 2025 by Abel, not Cain
I missread

[Finn]

58 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad -1
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

[Finn 730]

58 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

for those of you confused by my statement last night 104th REQUESTED THIS HELMET YEARS AGO  before I was even on the server for Dire squad and instead we were forced to choose between the Engineer helmet or 2nd AC so if someone else gets this helmet you will have A TON of pissed players new and old heads 

Justice for Dire squad -1
 

@Arizona I love ya dude but its kind of an injustice to my boys past and present if I dont bring this info to light and make a big stink about it.

 

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

[Juggernaut]

40 minutes ago, Finn said:

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways Im not against 212th getting something new BUT you can damn sure bet I will call out the people who DIDNT GIVE 104th the models we asked for. we really really hate the helmet choices we were given. and Im not trying to upset anyone either I just want what was rightfully requested brought to light if 212th does get this

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Juggernaut

[Juggernaut 121]

40 minutes ago, Finn said:

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways Im not against 212th getting something new BUT you can damn sure bet I will call out the people who DIDNT GIVE 104th the models we asked for. we really really hate the helmet choices we were given. and Im not trying to upset anyone either I just want what was rightfully requested brought to light if 212th does get this

 

Edited April 2, 2025 by Juggernaut

[Conrad]

7 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways

2023 is 2 years ago. Just put the suggestion up again.

[Conrad 2,465]

7 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways

2023 is 2 years ago. Just put the suggestion up again.

[blazin]

 

8 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways

btw its server SUGGESTIONS not server DEMANDS 

[blazin 308]

 

8 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

Im saying no because 104th shouldn't have to ask for it again if the devs see my message and right the wrong then Ill +1 your request even though I only ever saw 104th with that helmet anyways

btw its server SUGGESTIONS not server DEMANDS 

[Juggernaut]

2 minutes ago, blazin said:

 

btw its server SUGGESTIONS not server DEMANDS 

okay okay maybe I am a bit fired up but it does feel a little insulting from my perspective. I could have worded it less demanding.

 

[Juggernaut 121]

2 minutes ago, blazin said:

 

btw its server SUGGESTIONS not server DEMANDS 

okay okay maybe I am a bit fired up but it does feel a little insulting from my perspective. I could have worded it less demanding.

 

[Marvel]

21 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

okay okay maybe I am a bit fired up but it does feel a little insulting from my perspective. I could have worded it less demanding.

 

Just so you’re aware when that suggestion was posted and denied if I recall was when synergy was either at its lowest or just barely picking itself back up. We didn’t have a dev team then we barely had a player base. Thankfully for the first time in Synergy’s history there is an actual dev team and a damn good one at that.

Those models would have been sick for Dire Squad I agree. Suggest them again and I’m sure the outcome will be much better than before. Holding a grudge from two years ago ain’t gonna change nothing. I hope to see another attempt soon!

Edited April 2, 2025 by Marvel

[Marvel 3,308]

21 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

okay okay maybe I am a bit fired up but it does feel a little insulting from my perspective. I could have worded it less demanding.

 

Just so you’re aware when that suggestion was posted and denied if I recall was when synergy was either at its lowest or just barely picking itself back up. We didn’t have a dev team then we barely had a player base. Thankfully for the first time in Synergy’s history there is an actual dev team and a damn good one at that.

Those models would have been sick for Dire Squad I agree. Suggest them again and I’m sure the outcome will be much better than before. Holding a grudge from two years ago ain’t gonna change nothing. I hope to see another attempt soon!

Edited April 2, 2025 by Marvel

[Rice]

As a practice, the development team tries to remain impartial throughout suggestion discourse to ensure that the community can engage without undue influence. However, given some of the more pointed feedback in this thread, I believe it is prudent to offer our perspectives, as other development team members have already done.

I am not opposed to introducing new groups onto the server. I concur, in part, with your goal of novelty and creativity, and I applaud your initiative. However, given the development team’s finite resources, we will often prioritize projects that have the most impact on the most people on the server. Specific changes, especially for a select few, are set aside due to the development team’s constraints. Furthermore, you must be attentive to existing rules that govern how many subunits can exist per group. You must also be diligent in your consideration of your suggestion’s impact on the server – a responsibility the development team also bears.

Concerning the suggestion discussion, I believe that passion has overwhelmed the typical cordial discourse. I can appreciate boisterous advocacy for one's suggestion, but our contributions should always be in good faith.

As others have already mentioned, the development team is filled with volunteers. There are many demands for our time, and we aren’t able to attend to everyone’s wishes. Furthermore, we do not rebuke someone simply because they dissent – but passing judgment on the server as “stale” because some weren’t as receptive to your suggestion isn’t fair to us, nor does it acknowledge the work that has already gone into the server.

Suggestions are an important tool to give players a voice directly in how the server changes and grows. Discussions on suggestions should be collective and lively, inviting agreeing and dissenting views alike. However, suggestions are simply the beginning of a lengthy and often arduous process of consideration and implementation. We appreciate your passion, and we ask for your patience.

[Rice 13]

As a practice, the development team tries to remain impartial throughout suggestion discourse to ensure that the community can engage without undue influence. However, given some of the more pointed feedback in this thread, I believe it is prudent to offer our perspectives, as other development team members have already done.

I am not opposed to introducing new groups onto the server. I concur, in part, with your goal of novelty and creativity, and I applaud your initiative. However, given the development team’s finite resources, we will often prioritize projects that have the most impact on the most people on the server. Specific changes, especially for a select few, are set aside due to the development team’s constraints. Furthermore, you must be attentive to existing rules that govern how many subunits can exist per group. You must also be diligent in your consideration of your suggestion’s impact on the server – a responsibility the development team also bears.

Concerning the suggestion discussion, I believe that passion has overwhelmed the typical cordial discourse. I can appreciate boisterous advocacy for one's suggestion, but our contributions should always be in good faith.

As others have already mentioned, the development team is filled with volunteers. There are many demands for our time, and we aren’t able to attend to everyone’s wishes. Furthermore, we do not rebuke someone simply because they dissent – but passing judgment on the server as “stale” because some weren’t as receptive to your suggestion isn’t fair to us, nor does it acknowledge the work that has already gone into the server.

Suggestions are an important tool to give players a voice directly in how the server changes and grows. Discussions on suggestions should be collective and lively, inviting agreeing and dissenting views alike. However, suggestions are simply the beginning of a lengthy and often arduous process of consideration and implementation. We appreciate your passion, and we ask for your patience.

[Brooklyn]

7 minutes ago, Rice said:

As a practice, the development team tries to remain impartial throughout suggestion discourse to ensure that the community can engage without undue influence. However, given some of the more pointed feedback in this thread, I believe it is prudent to offer our perspectives, as other development team members have already done.

I am not opposed to introducing new groups onto the server. I concur, in part, with your goal of novelty and creativity, and I applaud your initiative. However, given the development team’s finite resources, we will often prioritize projects that have the most impact on the most people on the server. Specific changes, especially for a select few, are set aside due to the development team’s constraints. Furthermore, you must be attentive to existing rules that govern how many subunits can exist per group. You must also be diligent in your consideration of your suggestion’s impact on the server – a responsibility the development team also bears.

Concerning the suggestion discussion, I believe that passion has overwhelmed the typical cordial discourse. I can appreciate boisterous advocacy for one's suggestion, but our contributions should always be in good faith.

As others have already mentioned, the development team is filled with volunteers. There are many demands for our time, and we aren’t able to attend to everyone’s wishes. Furthermore, we do not rebuke someone simply because they dissent – but passing judgment on the server as “stale” because some weren’t as receptive to your suggestion isn’t fair to us, nor does it acknowledge the work that has already gone into the server.

Suggestions are an important tool to give players a voice directly in how the server changes and grows. Discussions on suggestions should be collective and lively, inviting agreeing and dissenting views alike. However, suggestions are simply the beginning of a lengthy and often arduous process of consideration and implementation. We appreciate your passion, and we ask for your patience.

This chat gpt?

[Brooklyn 1,214]

7 minutes ago, Rice said:

As a practice, the development team tries to remain impartial throughout suggestion discourse to ensure that the community can engage without undue influence. However, given some of the more pointed feedback in this thread, I believe it is prudent to offer our perspectives, as other development team members have already done.

I am not opposed to introducing new groups onto the server. I concur, in part, with your goal of novelty and creativity, and I applaud your initiative. However, given the development team’s finite resources, we will often prioritize projects that have the most impact on the most people on the server. Specific changes, especially for a select few, are set aside due to the development team’s constraints. Furthermore, you must be attentive to existing rules that govern how many subunits can exist per group. You must also be diligent in your consideration of your suggestion’s impact on the server – a responsibility the development team also bears.

Concerning the suggestion discussion, I believe that passion has overwhelmed the typical cordial discourse. I can appreciate boisterous advocacy for one's suggestion, but our contributions should always be in good faith.

As others have already mentioned, the development team is filled with volunteers. There are many demands for our time, and we aren’t able to attend to everyone’s wishes. Furthermore, we do not rebuke someone simply because they dissent – but passing judgment on the server as “stale” because some weren’t as receptive to your suggestion isn’t fair to us, nor does it acknowledge the work that has already gone into the server.

Suggestions are an important tool to give players a voice directly in how the server changes and grows. Discussions on suggestions should be collective and lively, inviting agreeing and dissenting views alike. However, suggestions are simply the beginning of a lengthy and often arduous process of consideration and implementation. We appreciate your passion, and we ask for your patience.

This chat gpt?

[SilverCrowe]

2 hours ago, Finn said:

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

[SilverCrowe 9]

2 hours ago, Finn said:

You can ask for it too, you know. Saying we shouldn't have something because you were told no years ago is kinda silly 

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

[Juggernaut]

1 minute ago, SilverCrowe said:

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

YES THANK YOU FINALLY SOMEONE CAN TRANSLATE!!!!!! 

LOL

[Juggernaut 121]

1 minute ago, SilverCrowe said:

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

YES THANK YOU FINALLY SOMEONE CAN TRANSLATE!!!!!! 

LOL

[Brooklyn]

5 minutes ago, SilverCrowe said:

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

hold hold hold. Just to be fully clear. Y'all want the EVO helmets for 104th. 212th wants a model and helmet that is 100% different. But because y'all didn't get it and haven't suggested it in forever. . . then this suggestion should suffer?

[Brooklyn 1,214]

5 minutes ago, SilverCrowe said:

To my knowledge it has been asked for quite a few times and We were told NO each time, We are not saying that they can't have it that it's only 104th, what is meant though could be worded better is that they can have and Use the Helmet, but WE would like to aswell as its something the 104th has been looking to get for a longer time than this suggestion, Jugg is passionate about his boys and has removed his -1 as it was not the Right wording he meant to use 

 

hold hold hold. Just to be fully clear. Y'all want the EVO helmets for 104th. 212th wants a model and helmet that is 100% different. But because y'all didn't get it and haven't suggested it in forever. . . then this suggestion should suffer?

[SilverCrowe]

7 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

YES THANK YOU FINALLY SOMEONE CAN TRANSLATE!!!!!! 

LOL

I been working on my Jugg to English Dictonary, Almost ready to go to Publishers

 

[SilverCrowe 9]

7 minutes ago, Juggernaut said:

YES THANK YOU FINALLY SOMEONE CAN TRANSLATE!!!!!! 

LOL

I been working on my Jugg to English Dictonary, Almost ready to go to Publishers

 

[SilverCrowe]

3 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

hold hold hold. Just to be fully clear. Y'all want the EVO helmets for 104th. 212th wants a model and helmet that is 100% different. But because y'all didn't get it and haven't suggested it in forever. . . then this suggestion should suffer?

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

[SilverCrowe 9]

3 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

hold hold hold. Just to be fully clear. Y'all want the EVO helmets for 104th. 212th wants a model and helmet that is 100% different. But because y'all didn't get it and haven't suggested it in forever. . . then this suggestion should suffer?

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

[Gohn]

1 minute ago, SilverCrowe said:

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

so if you where told it would never happen then why are you still bringing it up?

[Gohn 242]

1 minute ago, SilverCrowe said:

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

so if you where told it would never happen then why are you still bringing it up?

[Brooklyn]

2 minutes ago, SilverCrowe said:

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

So your point is contradicting. You want to see it happen IF you get your stuff? And on top of that. Who specifically told you it would never happen so we can @ them and get the actual clarification. Cause if you were actually told it would never happen and you are still asking for it, then my friend y'all are really barking up the wrong tree.

[Brooklyn 1,214]

2 minutes ago, SilverCrowe said:

Yeah we would Like the EVO Helmets for 104th Sure, We do not want the suggestion to suffer for it, in fact if it meant that the Helmet got added we would like to see the suggestion go through, it's just when we last brought it up we were more or less told NO and to Stop asking as it would NOT happen Ever 

So your point is contradicting. You want to see it happen IF you get your stuff? And on top of that. Who specifically told you it would never happen so we can @ them and get the actual clarification. Cause if you were actually told it would never happen and you are still asking for it, then my friend y'all are really barking up the wrong tree.

[SilverCrowe]

1 minute ago, Gohn said:

so if you where told it would never happen then why are you still bringing it up?

We Brought it up as it is what they are also asking for, we are simply saying We would like to have it also if Implemented, as we were looking for it longer that is all 

 

[SilverCrowe 9]

1 minute ago, Gohn said:

so if you where told it would never happen then why are you still bringing it up?

We Brought it up as it is what they are also asking for, we are simply saying We would like to have it also if Implemented, as we were looking for it longer that is all 

 

[Juggernaut]

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

So your point is contradicting. You want to see it happen IF you get your stuff? And on top of that. Who specifically told you it would never happen so we can @ them and get the actual clarification. Cause if you were actually told it would never happen and you are still asking for it, then my friend y'all are really barking up the wrong tree.

who ever was incharge of dev before JayArr I cant remember their name cause I talked to them 1 time. as for the contradiction also my bad I dont exactly make the most sense when Im fired up. When I sent my first message I was trying to convey the point that when Dire squad Asked for this helmet they got shut down. I was trying to warn 212th in my own weird bass ackwards way. That said I also feel that if it does go through it is a slap in the face because I mentioned the helmets multiple times to the current dev team as they were making the Dire squad whitelist so WE DID try... if this doesnt make sense at this point I cant get through to you all because I am genuinely to tired to try and explain any more

[Juggernaut 121]

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn said:

So your point is contradicting. You want to see it happen IF you get your stuff? And on top of that. Who specifically told you it would never happen so we can @ them and get the actual clarification. Cause if you were actually told it would never happen and you are still asking for it, then my friend y'all are really barking up the wrong tree.

who ever was incharge of dev before JayArr I cant remember their name cause I talked to them 1 time. as for the contradiction also my bad I dont exactly make the most sense when Im fired up. When I sent my first message I was trying to convey the point that when Dire squad Asked for this helmet they got shut down. I was trying to warn 212th in my own weird bass ackwards way. That said I also feel that if it does go through it is a slap in the face because I mentioned the helmets multiple times to the current dev team as they were making the Dire squad whitelist so WE DID try... if this doesnt make sense at this point I cant get through to you all because I am genuinely to tired to try and explain any more

[Moose_Wundo]

- Can we please keep this to the point at hand and not clog up the suggestion -

[Moose_Wundo 214]

- Can we please keep this to the point at hand and not clog up the suggestion -

[Eclipse]

-1

Don't be greedy 

[Eclipse 820]

-1

Don't be greedy 

[Zensras]

-1

We already have Red Squadron, Ghost Company, and 2ndAC.  We barely managed to fill all three, and you want another subunit.   I can understand thinking we could get it based on something said prior by server leadership (if it's unique, we will add it), but this is too much.

 Work on fixing the issues we currently have before even think of adding more.   Jayarr himself said it point and clear - You cannot get this without removing one.   You cannot wiggle out of it and I personally do not see you removing any of them. 

Edited April 3, 2025 by Zensras

[Zensras 239]

-1

We already have Red Squadron, Ghost Company, and 2ndAC.  We barely managed to fill all three, and you want another subunit.   I can understand thinking we could get it based on something said prior by server leadership (if it's unique, we will add it), but this is too much.

 Work on fixing the issues we currently have before even think of adding more.   Jayarr himself said it point and clear - You cannot get this without removing one.   You cannot wiggle out of it and I personally do not see you removing any of them. 

Edited April 3, 2025 by Zensras

[Jayarr]

alright, enough is enough my friends
locking this, dev team will consider it once server suggestions close

[Jayarr 1,037]

alright, enough is enough my friends
locking this, dev team will consider it once server suggestions close