Sock Monkey Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 Name: Sock Monkey RP Rank: Commander Suggestion: Remove the "can't refer to order 66" in OOC rule Implementation: Remove the rule Lore: -- Workshop content if applicable: -- (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Other: This rule is stupid... 1st, the obvious reason, OOC literally means out of character, we should be able to talk about whatever we want, we can talk about the original trilogy in ooc we can talk about the sequels in ooc and we can talk about literally everything else referring to starwars, so why cant we talk about order 66??? 2nd, we've literally done several order 66 events, imagine being like "/ooc yo that order 66 event was super dope and fun" then getting banned for a week??????? 3rd, we can talk about like the holocaust and shit in ooc..... order 66 is not that bad lol? Overall it just seems like an extremely unnecessary rule that leads to pointless bans ( THIS IS NOT IMPLYING THAT REFERENCING ORDER 66 INGAME SHOULD BE ALLOWED IC, THAT WOULD STILL BE FAILRP) 1 6 :)
Posted June 26, 2019 Name: Sock Monkey RP Rank: Commander Suggestion: Remove the "can't refer to order 66" in OOC rule Implementation: Remove the rule Lore: -- Workshop content if applicable: -- (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Other: This rule is stupid... 1st, the obvious reason, OOC literally means out of character, we should be able to talk about whatever we want, we can talk about the original trilogy in ooc we can talk about the sequels in ooc and we can talk about literally everything else referring to starwars, so why cant we talk about order 66??? 2nd, we've literally done several order 66 events, imagine being like "/ooc yo that order 66 event was super dope and fun" then getting banned for a week??????? 3rd, we can talk about like the holocaust and shit in ooc..... order 66 is not that bad lol? Overall it just seems like an extremely unnecessary rule that leads to pointless bans ( THIS IS NOT IMPLYING THAT REFERENCING ORDER 66 INGAME SHOULD BE ALLOWED IC, THAT WOULD STILL BE FAILRP) 1 6 :)
Jayarr Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Tbh, I've always wondered why it's not allowed. I see no logical reasoning. It's something from the movie...in OOC. It hurts no one, and no one cares except for staff who are told to not allow that. Which can easily change. Just make it strictly AOSable, or bannable if you really are so hungry to ban, IC wise. OOC wise is super dumb. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Jayarr
Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Tbh, I've always wondered why it's not allowed. I see no logical reasoning. It's something from the movie...in OOC. It hurts no one, and no one cares except for staff who are told to not allow that. Which can easily change. Just make it strictly AOSable, or bannable if you really are so hungry to ban, IC wise. OOC wise is super dumb. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Jayarr
Joe Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Its time for that rule to go, its been so long and so useless. Retired: OG of Synergy | Head Admin | Game Master Chief | Senior Attack and Defense Brigade Commander | #FirstCommanderAppToBeAcceptedOnTheForums.
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Its time for that rule to go, its been so long and so useless. Retired: OG of Synergy | Head Admin | Game Master Chief | Senior Attack and Defense Brigade Commander | #FirstCommanderAppToBeAcceptedOnTheForums.
Craigary Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Current:Chud ex Delta 1138 SGT Boss | Elder Paladin Caleb Dume | Guild Marshal Mathers |Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO 2x | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Sev | Fixer | Foxtrot EOD| Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | coooooooooker | TCC Appo |Jesse | Tup | warthog | Lightning Squad| Base Ops Commander | 101st SMB | Synr.gg discord admin|- Everything else i was
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Current:Chud ex Delta 1138 SGT Boss | Elder Paladin Caleb Dume | Guild Marshal Mathers |Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO 2x | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Sev | Fixer | Foxtrot EOD| Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | coooooooooker | TCC Appo |Jesse | Tup | warthog | Lightning Squad| Base Ops Commander | 101st SMB | Synr.gg discord admin|- Everything else i was
Doc Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) -snip- Edited June 30, 2019 by Doc Uhh Robert Pattinson
Jax Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 The argument that a new CT would be confused is rather on the extreme side, anyone that would do it is most likely a minge. We shouldn't ban stuff like this on the server for < 1% chance of a problem arising.
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 The argument that a new CT would be confused is rather on the extreme side, anyone that would do it is most likely a minge. We shouldn't ban stuff like this on the server for < 1% chance of a problem arising.
Arroyo Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 No wonder why I was getting so much dumb reactions it was auto corrected to -1 lmao Edited June 27, 2019 by Arroyo 2
Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 No wonder why I was getting so much dumb reactions it was auto corrected to -1 lmao Edited June 27, 2019 by Arroyo 2
Scribbles Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Sock Monkey said: order 66 is not that bad lol? I mean, did you see Plo Koons death? Guy was re-enacting the twin towers but with cato-nemodia . Also +1 2 4
Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Sock Monkey said: order 66 is not that bad lol? I mean, did you see Plo Koons death? Guy was re-enacting the twin towers but with cato-nemodia . Also +1 2 4
Marvel Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 but we will have to ban you for a week on the forums for referencing the forbidden order. Hope your suggestion passes! See ya in a week! 2 1
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 but we will have to ban you for a week on the forums for referencing the forbidden order. Hope your suggestion passes! See ya in a week! 2 1
Beb Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1, it’s one thing if it’s in RP but this rule always has been a little retarded.
Posted June 26, 2019 +1, it’s one thing if it’s in RP but this rule always has been a little retarded.
Stern Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 Obviously arroyo fucking gives a -1 But massive +1, The rule has caused more harm to people than good 1 1
Posted June 26, 2019 Obviously arroyo fucking gives a -1 But massive +1, The rule has caused more harm to people than good 1 1
Stockings Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719
Craigary Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Arroyo said: -1 If you’re giving negative feedback, you should give a reason so you don’t look like a h8r 3 Current:Chud ex Delta 1138 SGT Boss | Elder Paladin Caleb Dume | Guild Marshal Mathers |Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO 2x | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Sev | Fixer | Foxtrot EOD| Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | coooooooooker | TCC Appo |Jesse | Tup | warthog | Lightning Squad| Base Ops Commander | 101st SMB | Synr.gg discord admin|- Everything else i was
Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Arroyo said: -1 If you’re giving negative feedback, you should give a reason so you don’t look like a h8r 3 Current:Chud ex Delta 1138 SGT Boss | Elder Paladin Caleb Dume | Guild Marshal Mathers |Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO 2x | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Sev | Fixer | Foxtrot EOD| Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | coooooooooker | TCC Appo |Jesse | Tup | warthog | Lightning Squad| Base Ops Commander | 101st SMB | Synr.gg discord admin|- Everything else i was
Trixx Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) People who give -1 are trolls apparently +1 In character sure get them but OOC is OOC Edited June 26, 2019 by Trixx I was in Dooms Unit for a little while.
Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) People who give -1 are trolls apparently +1 In character sure get them but OOC is OOC Edited June 26, 2019 by Trixx I was in Dooms Unit for a little while.
Gadget Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 Ir remember a buddy of mine got banned for a week because he was drunk on the server in down time and said Order 66 in OOC. Still have it for Comms and in game but not OOC +1 What? Were you expecting some colourful thing denoting my past achievements? Well tough luck, even if I did it would be just 3 things - Bacara, SPEC REG, Old HA. Once a Marine, Always a Marine... Always forward, never back...
Posted June 26, 2019 Ir remember a buddy of mine got banned for a week because he was drunk on the server in down time and said Order 66 in OOC. Still have it for Comms and in game but not OOC +1 What? Were you expecting some colourful thing denoting my past achievements? Well tough luck, even if I did it would be just 3 things - Bacara, SPEC REG, Old HA. Once a Marine, Always a Marine... Always forward, never back...
BigZach Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 -1 This will leadto hate crimes and the N-word rule being removed.... +1 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
Posted June 26, 2019 -1 This will leadto hate crimes and the N-word rule being removed.... +1 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
Moros Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 Almost every single time I trained a Cadet I was unable to explain to them in honest terms why such a ridiculous rule was in place and enforced for something that is OOC. +1
Posted June 26, 2019 Almost every single time I trained a Cadet I was unable to explain to them in honest terms why such a ridiculous rule was in place and enforced for something that is OOC. +1
silvers Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 it’s kinda weird that you can’t say it in OOC at least
Buuged Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 honestly fucking retarded 21st's most useless long term member why my shit keep getting deleted
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 honestly fucking retarded 21st's most useless long term member why my shit keep getting deleted
Scribbles Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 29 minutes ago, BigZach said: the N-word rule being removed. See we should add a rule that you're allowed to say it, but only when shock are protecting Ms.Obama 1 1
Posted June 26, 2019 29 minutes ago, BigZach said: the N-word rule being removed. See we should add a rule that you're allowed to say it, but only when shock are protecting Ms.Obama 1 1
ISNIFFPROPANE Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 People gettin banned for this dumb ass rule...
CannonBanned Posted June 26, 2019 Banned Posted June 26, 2019 Neutral im not againist but good luck! Sanchez trembles at the mention of my name.
Banned Posted June 26, 2019 Neutral im not againist but good luck! Sanchez trembles at the mention of my name.
Perri Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Well it is Out of Character chat. /comms and /advert chat. gets the hammer down. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Perri Former Commander Cody "2 Terms,6 months" Former Attack Regimental Commander
Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Well it is Out of Character chat. /comms and /advert chat. gets the hammer down. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Perri Former Commander Cody "2 Terms,6 months" Former Attack Regimental Commander
Clank Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 if I can talk about Iwo Jima and tiananmen square in OOC then why the fuck can't i say order 66? Edited June 26, 2019 by Clank
Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 if I can talk about Iwo Jima and tiananmen square in OOC then why the fuck can't i say order 66? Edited June 26, 2019 by Clank
Piff Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 well i guess im going to start talking about the holocaust “I’m not toxic, It’s just hard not to treat you like an idiot” ~ Logic
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 well i guess im going to start talking about the holocaust “I’m not toxic, It’s just hard not to treat you like an idiot” ~ Logic
Elijah Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Currently holds: Master of the Order Mace Windu Past Postions: 2Del, x10Boomer, x3Anakin , x2Eeth Koth, Lumi, Quinlan, Adi, x2Kit Fisto, Shaak Tix2, 501st CMD, 91st CMD, Kano, Hawk, 2xAppo, 241st CMD
Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Currently holds: Master of the Order Mace Windu Past Postions: 2Del, x10Boomer, x3Anakin , x2Eeth Koth, Lumi, Quinlan, Adi, x2Kit Fisto, Shaak Tix2, 501st CMD, 91st CMD, Kano, Hawk, 2xAppo, 241st CMD
Loopy Newby Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 +1 although it useful for catching early minges I literally train my CC’s and say “this one is kinda a stupid rule”
Posted June 27, 2019 +1 although it useful for catching early minges I literally train my CC’s and say “this one is kinda a stupid rule”
Agent Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 The grestest gamer which is myself gotta +1 this as well.
Foxey Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 +1 As said previously, OOC legitimately means Out Of Character. When training new CCs I make clear not to reference the order, but every time I do that it feels very dumb.
Posted June 27, 2019 +1 As said previously, OOC legitimately means Out Of Character. When training new CCs I make clear not to reference the order, but every time I do that it feels very dumb.
Thunder Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 +1 yeet that rule outta here what do people put here now
Chambers Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this?
Posted June 27, 2019 Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this?
Arroyo Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 16 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Lmao I remember that. I was staff during those times and that drama
Posted June 27, 2019 16 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Lmao I remember that. I was staff during those times and that drama
Nade Jones Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 24 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Not only that but I believe it falls under common sense, likewise for most rules if rules are broken without knowledge they shouldn't be insta punishable Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
Posted June 27, 2019 24 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Not only that but I believe it falls under common sense, likewise for most rules if rules are broken without knowledge they shouldn't be insta punishable Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
Nade Jones Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
Posted June 27, 2019 Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
BigZach Posted June 27, 2019 Posted June 27, 2019 1 minute ago, Nade Jones said: Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Probs IFN 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
Posted June 27, 2019 1 minute ago, Nade Jones said: Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Probs IFN 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
TahuNova613 Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 +1 Flip 66 and you get 99, don't do this to him
Snow Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 Doesn't even make sense for clones to get in trouble in character if we are going by legends, since it's part of a series of contingency orders that every clone knows from flash training. Specifically Order 66 is a contingency order to remove the Jedi from power in the attempt of a coup, In lore they don't get in deep shit because they know of Order 66, since every clone knows what the order is, they get in shit because they know how the chancellor plans to use the contingency order. It's never made sense to be a rule even from a lore standpoint, and it's always been super stupid that you can be punished because of saying something so simple in ooc, even if it is part of a legitimate conversation. And to anyone who would argue about it in character, the authorization for the order can only come from the chancellor. Edited June 30, 2019 by Snow Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore - "Pressure makes diamonds, Ease makes decay" 2 time Rancor BCMD, 3 time Commander Havoc
Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 Doesn't even make sense for clones to get in trouble in character if we are going by legends, since it's part of a series of contingency orders that every clone knows from flash training. Specifically Order 66 is a contingency order to remove the Jedi from power in the attempt of a coup, In lore they don't get in deep shit because they know of Order 66, since every clone knows what the order is, they get in shit because they know how the chancellor plans to use the contingency order. It's never made sense to be a rule even from a lore standpoint, and it's always been super stupid that you can be punished because of saying something so simple in ooc, even if it is part of a legitimate conversation. And to anyone who would argue about it in character, the authorization for the order can only come from the chancellor. Edited June 30, 2019 by Snow Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore - "Pressure makes diamonds, Ease makes decay" 2 time Rancor BCMD, 3 time Commander Havoc
GM-3022 Havok Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 I remember once I was saying in ooc about how awesome Wolffe was for surviving order 66 and I almost got beaned for it. Just ban ppl that intentionally advert or comms or spam order 66 instead of banning people for saying it in ooc. Like literally its a dumb rule. And rules like this discourage people from playing on the server. Remember, we're Synergy. Not IceFuse. We actually give a shit about our players. Edited June 30, 2019 by GM-3022 Havok
Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 I remember once I was saying in ooc about how awesome Wolffe was for surviving order 66 and I almost got beaned for it. Just ban ppl that intentionally advert or comms or spam order 66 instead of banning people for saying it in ooc. Like literally its a dumb rule. And rules like this discourage people from playing on the server. Remember, we're Synergy. Not IceFuse. We actually give a shit about our players. Edited June 30, 2019 by GM-3022 Havok
Doc Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 On 6/26/2019 at 11:54 AM, Arroyo said: +1 No wonder why I was getting so much dumb reactions it was auto corrected to -1 lmao Man, arroyo giving so many -1s that when he finally puts a +1 his phone doesn’t let him +1 Uhh Robert Pattinson
Posted June 30, 2019 On 6/26/2019 at 11:54 AM, Arroyo said: +1 No wonder why I was getting so much dumb reactions it was auto corrected to -1 lmao Man, arroyo giving so many -1s that when he finally puts a +1 his phone doesn’t let him +1 Uhh Robert Pattinson
silvers Posted July 1, 2019 Posted July 1, 2019 Unfortunately, this has been denied, we have discussed it and felt that if we were to allow it, people would minge the fuck out of it. Banning people for saying Order 66 out of a whim is not what is supposed to happen as well, so if you see it, report it to an HA+ ASAP. It should start off with a simple warning before it gets even close to escalating to something like that. We have also decided on lowering the ban from 7 days to 3 days since we felt like 7 days was too much for this rule. A good reason why someone should be banned for this reason is ONLY if it were to be obviously malicious. If a staff bans someone referring to that with an unmalicious standpoint, that is a big no-no. // moved to "Denied" 2
Posted July 1, 2019 Unfortunately, this has been denied, we have discussed it and felt that if we were to allow it, people would minge the fuck out of it. Banning people for saying Order 66 out of a whim is not what is supposed to happen as well, so if you see it, report it to an HA+ ASAP. It should start off with a simple warning before it gets even close to escalating to something like that. We have also decided on lowering the ban from 7 days to 3 days since we felt like 7 days was too much for this rule. A good reason why someone should be banned for this reason is ONLY if it were to be obviously malicious. If a staff bans someone referring to that with an unmalicious standpoint, that is a big no-no. // moved to "Denied" 2
Recommended Posts