Sock Monkey Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 Name: Sock Monkey RP Rank: Commander Suggestion: Remove the "can't refer to order 66" in OOC rule Implementation: Remove the rule Lore: -- Workshop content if applicable: -- (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Other: This rule is stupid... 1st, the obvious reason, OOC literally means out of character, we should be able to talk about whatever we want, we can talk about the original trilogy in ooc we can talk about the sequels in ooc and we can talk about literally everything else referring to starwars, so why cant we talk about order 66??? 2nd, we've literally done several order 66 events, imagine being like "/ooc yo that order 66 event was super dope and fun" then getting banned for a week??????? 3rd, we can talk about like the holocaust and shit in ooc..... order 66 is not that bad lol? Overall it just seems like an extremely unnecessary rule that leads to pointless bans ( THIS IS NOT IMPLYING THAT REFERENCING ORDER 66 INGAME SHOULD BE ALLOWED IC, THAT WOULD STILL BE FAILRP) 1 6 Report :) Link to comment
Fizzik Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Rule-maker and rule-breaker. Link to comment
Jayarr Posted June 26, 2019 Banned Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Tbh, I've always wondered why it's not allowed. I see no logical reasoning. It's something from the movie...in OOC. It hurts no one, and no one cares except for staff who are told to not allow that. Which can easily change. Just make it strictly AOSable, or bannable if you really are so hungry to ban, IC wise. OOC wise is super dumb. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Jayarr Link to comment
Joe Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Its time for that rule to go, its been so long and so useless. Retired: OG of Synergy | Head Admin | Game Master Chief | Senior Attack and Defense Brigade Commander | #FirstCommanderAppToBeAcceptedOnTheForums. Link to comment
SmallJeff Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 its ooc rule is kinda stupid imo Link to comment
Craigary Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Fixer | Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | cooker | Jesse | Tup | warthog - Everything else i was Link to comment
Jax Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 The argument that a new CT would be confused is rather on the extreme side, anyone that would do it is most likely a minge. We shouldn't ban stuff like this on the server for < 1% chance of a problem arising. Link to comment
Arroyo Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 No wonder why I was getting so much dumb reactions it was auto corrected to -1 lmao Edited June 27, 2019 by Arroyo 2 Report Link to comment
Scribbles Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Sock Monkey said: order 66 is not that bad lol? I mean, did you see Plo Koons death? Guy was re-enacting the twin towers but with cato-nemodia . Also +1 2 4 Report Link to comment
Management Marvel Posted June 26, 2019 Management Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 but we will have to ban you for a week on the forums for referencing the forbidden order. Hope your suggestion passes! See ya in a week! 2 1 Report i am literally captain tukk Link to comment
Beb Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1, it’s one thing if it’s in RP but this rule always has been a little retarded. Link to comment
Stern Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 Obviously arroyo fucking gives a -1 But massive +1, The rule has caused more harm to people than good 1 1 Report Link to comment
Stockings Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719 Feel free to message me if you're having any issues! Link to comment
Craigary Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Arroyo said: -1 If you’re giving negative feedback, you should give a reason so you don’t look like a h8r 3 Report Ex HA | VA | SA | A | NA | GMC | GMM | GMO | GM | GH | TRO x4? | TR | RTR | Hunter | Darman | Mereel | Fixer | Etain | Anakin | Hett | Base ops Commander | Forum Mod | Ahsoka x2| Tyzen Xebec | cooker | Jesse | Tup | warthog - Everything else i was Link to comment
Trixx Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) People who give -1 are trolls apparently +1 In character sure get them but OOC is OOC Edited June 26, 2019 by Trixx I was in Dooms Unit for a little while. Link to comment
Gadget Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 Ir remember a buddy of mine got banned for a week because he was drunk on the server in down time and said Order 66 in OOC. Still have it for Comms and in game but not OOC +1 What? Were you expecting some colourful thing denoting my past achievements? Well tough luck, even if I did it would be just 3 things - Bacara, SPEC REG, Old HA. Once a Marine, Always a Marine... Always forward, never back... Link to comment
BigZach Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 -1 This will leadto hate crimes and the N-word rule being removed.... +1 1 Report "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic Link to comment
Moros Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 Almost every single time I trained a Cadet I was unable to explain to them in honest terms why such a ridiculous rule was in place and enforced for something that is OOC. +1 Link to comment
Black Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 First and only Polish Director Link to comment
silvers Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 it’s kinda weird that you can’t say it in OOC at least Link to comment
Buuged Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 honestly fucking retarded 21st's most useless long term member why my shit keep getting deleted Link to comment
Scribbles Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 29 minutes ago, BigZach said: the N-word rule being removed. See we should add a rule that you're allowed to say it, but only when shock are protecting Ms.Obama 1 1 Report Link to comment
ISNIFFPROPANE Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 People gettin banned for this dumb ass rule... Link to comment
CannonBanned Posted June 26, 2019 Banned Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 Neutral im not againist but good luck! Sanchez trembles at the mention of my name. Link to comment
Perri Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Well it is Out of Character chat. /comms and /advert chat. gets the hammer down. +1 Edited June 26, 2019 by Perri Former Commander Cody "2 Terms,6 months" Former Attack Regimental Commander Link to comment
Clank Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) +1 if I can talk about Iwo Jima and tiananmen square in OOC then why the fuck can't i say order 66? Edited June 26, 2019 by Clank Link to comment
Piff Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 well i guess im going to start talking about the holocaust “I’m not toxic, It’s just hard not to treat you like an idiot” ~ Logic Link to comment
Elijah Posted June 26, 2019 Report Share Posted June 26, 2019 +1 Current: Retried Past: 2Del, x10Boomer, x3Anakin , x2Eeth Koth, Lumi, Quinlan, Adi, x2Kit Fisto, Shaak Ti, 501st CMD, 91st CMD, Kano, Hawk, 2xAppo Link to comment
Poe Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 327th Papa Attack Regimental x1 Bly x2 Link to comment
Loopy Newby Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 although it useful for catching early minges I literally train my CC’s and say “this one is kinda a stupid rule” Link to comment
Firat/Abi Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 I almost got beaned for it... Link to comment
Agent Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 The grestest gamer which is myself gotta +1 this as well. Link to comment
Polik Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 makes sense as long as its ooc Null-5 "Prudii" Link to comment
Foxey Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 As said previously, OOC legitimately means Out Of Character. When training new CCs I make clear not to reference the order, but every time I do that it feels very dumb. Link to comment
Thunder Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 +1 yeet that rule outta here Zuko Fanboy Link to comment
Chambers Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Link to comment
Arroyo Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 16 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Lmao I remember that. I was staff during those times and that drama Link to comment
Nade Jones Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 24 minutes ago, Carter said: Pretty sure we had a suggestion go through not too long ago where Order 66 was warn not to say it and only punish if it was maliciously being said. IE keep saying in OOC/Advert over and over? Does anyone else remember this? Not only that but I believe it falls under common sense, likewise for most rules if rules are broken without knowledge they shouldn't be insta punishable Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander Link to comment
Bbstine Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 What the piss, banned for saying bad words +1 Link to comment
Nade Jones Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander Link to comment
BigZach Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 1 minute ago, Nade Jones said: Interesting, where does the origin on the rule actually come from, Obviously in character we can't have people talking about it because its failRP but OOC? is there any reasoning what so ever? +1 Probs IFN 1 Report "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic Link to comment
TahuNova613 Posted June 28, 2019 Report Share Posted June 28, 2019 +1 Flip 66 and you get 99, don't do this to him Link to comment
Snow Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 Doesn't even make sense for clones to get in trouble in character if we are going by legends, since it's part of a series of contingency orders that every clone knows from flash training. Specifically Order 66 is a contingency order to remove the Jedi from power in the attempt of a coup, In lore they don't get in deep shit because they know of Order 66, since every clone knows what the order is, they get in shit because they know how the chancellor plans to use the contingency order. It's never made sense to be a rule even from a lore standpoint, and it's always been super stupid that you can be punished because of saying something so simple in ooc, even if it is part of a legitimate conversation. And to anyone who would argue about it in character, the authorization for the order can only come from the chancellor. Edited June 30, 2019 by Snow Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore - "Pressure makes diamonds, Ease makes decay" 2 time Rancor BCMD, 3 time Commander Havoc Link to comment
GM-3022 Havok Posted June 30, 2019 Report Share Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) +1 I remember once I was saying in ooc about how awesome Wolffe was for surviving order 66 and I almost got beaned for it. Just ban ppl that intentionally advert or comms or spam order 66 instead of banning people for saying it in ooc. Like literally its a dumb rule. And rules like this discourage people from playing on the server. Remember, we're Synergy. Not IceFuse. We actually give a shit about our players. Edited June 30, 2019 by GM-3022 Havok Link to comment
Esitt Posted July 1, 2019 Report Share Posted July 1, 2019 DIRECTORS @Dragon and @silvers Link to comment
silvers Posted July 1, 2019 Report Share Posted July 1, 2019 Unfortunately, this has been denied, we have discussed it and felt that if we were to allow it, people would minge the fuck out of it. Banning people for saying Order 66 out of a whim is not what is supposed to happen as well, so if you see it, report it to an HA+ ASAP. It should start off with a simple warning before it gets even close to escalating to something like that. We have also decided on lowering the ban from 7 days to 3 days since we felt like 7 days was too much for this rule. A good reason why someone should be banned for this reason is ONLY if it were to be obviously malicious. If a staff bans someone referring to that with an unmalicious standpoint, that is a big no-no. // moved to "Denied" 2 Report Link to comment
Recommended Posts