Base Pass System In-Game

[Rohan]

Name: Rohan

RP Rank: Guild LT

Suggestion: Adding base/visitor's passes to the in-game contract menu as a tab.

Implementation: The addition of base passes to the /contracts menu, that according to the main discord github channel is being improved, as a tab on there. Allowing the ranks that ARE able to grant base passes to access that tab through a command, I.E. /pass, and log it there for people to check. Anyone should be able to check the menu, however the exact ranks that would be able to grant it, copied from our BH Rules & Regulations would be the following:

WO-CPT = 6 hour Pass
Jedi Master = 12 hour Pass
Any Naval = 12 hour Pass
Any CG = 12 hour Pass
MAJ = 12 hour Pass
Jedi Overseer+ = 24 hour Pass
Commander+ = 24 hour Pass

Additionally, if this is possible, upon death remove the base pass from the system to enforce the NLR ruling. If it was an OOC death it could always be re-added (prop kill etc.)

How does this benefit the server you may ask?
Prevention of someone just filling in the current form and forging the pass (linked to the base access database).
Having a system in-game that allows us to keep track in game as opposed to having sheets which used to benefit the RSB, which no longer exist.
Enforcing the NLR rule with base passes and the system for removal of it upon dying.

Lore: Lore

Workshop content if applicable: Requires development

Other: I know the system is being worked on now and hope that posting it now it could still be added before the next update drops.

@Brooklyn  was involved from navy side from this, forgot to add that

Edited April 23, 2023 by Rohan

[Brooklyn]

+1 totally not bias

[Fyi]

+1 the current system is so ass

[Heart]

+1 -- or it can be given like the "Weapon's license" from DarkRP wink wink (One life pass)

[Poptart]

+1 if there's a decent way to implement this.

[KnightVR]

+1 CG always tabbing out of game seems kind of awkward and like having the arrest form be the same like the base pass, that’ll be really cool

[ToasterBath]

+1 i love improvements to the guild

[shroud]

W i agree +1

[Levii]

My only question if that's a thing then how would people be able to forge passes? I'm sure doing this could cause issues with metagaming as people will check them for a basepass before asking for it and metagame the hell out of BH.

[Arizona]

+1 would make this soooooo much easier for us CG 

 

[Alien]

+1

[Buzz]

+1 Would make life easier in the long run.

[TwoBit]

+1 Would help out a lot.

[Xiao]

+1 would be a very nice quality of life thing to have

[Mor]

+1 but maybe dont make it when they die it gets removed

[Brooklyn]

3 minutes ago, Levii said:

My only question if that's a thing then how would people be able to forge passes? I'm sure doing this could cause issues with metagaming as people will check them for a basepass before asking for it and metagame the hell out of BH.

Metagaming is AOSable. Although, people can STILL check as the database sheet for passes is public. So to answer this, if you ARE being metagamed. AOS them. The only way to prevent 100% metagaming is to not have base passes at all. Which would make BH being on base legally impossible

[Glory22]

+1 Excellent idea.

Also, what about maybe making it so that instead of making it a menu that people can see who has a pass, that when you run a command you need to be looking at the person, and it will automatically say "Base pass clear" sent in chat (in a way unable to be faked with /me) if they are actually on the list. Or, if they are not on the list, it would randomly pick between clear or invalid/forged? This would wholly prevent the style of metagaming by looking at the sheet and would allow for some RP where the BH doesn't immediately know if their fake pass was caught (which would be realistic). This could even be implemented to give buffs to Naval, CG, etc. when checking the passes so they are more likely to catch a fake pass, and maybe give one of the BH jobs a buff in faking them as well.

The actually logged, real passes could be placed somewhere accessible to Guild Leadership and Staff in the case of any rule debacles.

Edited April 23, 2023 by Keegan

[Hanz]

+1 Love this idea. Base-passes have kind of been a flawed system that never has been really changed because what more can you do to it, but now that we have the contract menu more things open up. Also love Keegan's idea to prevent meta-gaming like @Levii mentioned.

[Marvel]

Would also like to see different tiers of base passes that give access to different areas

[Mystic]

+1 can majorly help prevent metagaming. 

Only if its doable though

I also agree with Levii's question. It can fix some but it can cause some issues.

Edited April 23, 2023 by Mystic

[Rohan]

14 minutes ago, Marvel said:

Would also like to see different tiers of base passes that give access to different areas

That's what we got permits/contracts for 

[Baker]

+1

[Nescoh]

+1 This would actually help a lot, so many times I get passes and the person doesn't fill out a form then it's somehow on me. This would be god tier!

- CG MED SGT Snow | RvB Agent Wyoming

[Naffen]

+1 would also be cool to allow CG and Naval and Commanders+ revoke base passes as well in that menu and specify a reason

[Madara]

+1

[Gohn]

+1

[Boof]

+1

[Nazerino]

+1 I think this is a good system deserving of dev support.

 

[TwoBit]

put extra one on accident

Edited April 23, 2023 by TwoBit
oops

[Spaghetti]

+1 very good idea

[Xylops]

+1 this smart

[Kortnul]

ew bounty hunter, oh wait this is like actually a good idea +1

[Whataburger]

+1

[Pythin]

+1

[Soccer]

+1 and make it so CG can remove base passes as well please

[Wosy]

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE.
(Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

[Baron]

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED.

If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied.

// LOCKED
// MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
 

Quote

Denial reasons:
(These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.)

• Not providing sufficient information.
  • Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use.
• The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).
  • Ex: 35mb for one model.
• Lack of feedback.
  • Ex: Post has been up for 3 weeks and only received 1-10 votes.
• Majority negative feedback.
• Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server.
• Having multiple suggestions within one thread.
• Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion.
• Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial.