Glory22

Please read up on the information I linked! Also put some more effort and evidence backing yourself, and probably read server rules before appealing something saying there aren't rules against it.

Thank you for the additional information and context that was missing. I did not know the other reasons as they weren't listed in ban website. I'd just wait out your ban Mr. flenderson and be more careful to follow the rules next time.

This guy basically made Synergy what it is today… Unban him. Anyways @KaiserNeiner (I see you are the person who banned him) what exactly was the harassment here? I don’t see how telling someone to fuck off on its own is bannable when people can get away with saying the n word on intercom, but maybe that’s just me or some information is missing here. Anybody have clips of what happened?

-1 Not worth the development time [LFS] ARC-170 - Why do we need to add 188 MB of content when this ship already exists on the server? [LFS] Jedi Starfighters - This requires an additional 36 MB of required content for a ship used mostly during phase 1, which this server is not. Since this would be used by Jedi, did the council think this should be added? Same goes for all the Jedi ships here. [LFS] Anakin's Delta-7 Aethersprite-class Starfighter (AZURE ANGEL) - Phase 1 era ship, and it's just Anakin's skin as well. [LFS]Eta-2 Actis-class interceptor - 35 MB for this and it's required content when we already have ETA-2 on server. [LFS] BTL-B Y-Wing Starfighter (REPUBLIC Y-WING) and [LFS]Y-wing / Y-wing-Bombardier - These are the same ships, and the smaller of the two says it has numerous errors, while the one that supposedly works is 167MB. Every server I've seen try to use these has complaints of lag as well. [LFS] IG-227 Hailfire-class droid tank - I like this one, but according to description and comments it says it goes way faster than it should. [LFS] AOTR Skin Pack for Fisher's LAAT/i Gunship - This, plus the required [LFS] LAAT/i Gunship variant, adds up to 270MB+. Not really a great benefit when what is already in place works fine. (LFS) STAR WARS: Coruscant Guard LAAT - This also requires the [LFS] LAAT/i Gunship variant, but a CG skin is included in the above one, so why suggest this? [LFS] Star Wars | IPV-2C Stealth Corvette - Cool I guess, not really sure when it would be used though. I didn't test any of these myself, but that's about even with you not including any information about any of these addons or why they should be added. Anyways, just reading the descriptions alone I can find problems with just about all of the addons you linked. I don't think development time should be put towards implementing these and testing them with all their additional requirements, especially when most of what is suggested doesn't fit the server, already exists on it, or is a duplicate within your own suggestion. Realistically, adding more things to the server's catalogue of LFS vehicles past what has already been suggested just delays the time before the server moves on to LVS, which is actively supported and is getting more things made for it in recent times, such as a working AT-RT (which the server and 41st in particular has been waiting for for quite some time). I can tell I spent more time writing this comment that you did searching for these and evaluating if they're worthwhile adding to the server.

I don't think this had permission, and even if it did I would be -1ing it since Bossk would be better suited as an event character. I appreciate you going out of your way to post this and try to improve the Citizen faction though!

Was "found" in a box during event, most of 104th got them.

It is difficult to remain unbiased in this since I am also in the 104th with you and you were talking about the incident itself and talking about the process of writing your appeal, but I will give my honest thoughts on the matter based on the clip itself. Even though this was an accident, I do believe you should be a bit smarter with an explosive weapon such as the Ion Disruptor. You were in the middle of a huge group of people with people running/flying in front of you constantly, you should try to be aware of your surroundings more with that. I accidentally killed people during the event, however not to this extreme, and that was mostly due to the AOE of where it landed, not because I was shooting next to people or right over several peoples' shoulders. As you can see in the clip, a 212th even runs right through your line of fire a very small time before you shot, this was not a smart place to shoot from. Because of this, I do not believe a full 5 day ban is in order for this, so perhaps a reduction would be the best course of action. The lack of much effort into this appeal also make it harder to +1, and lack of taking any responsibility makes it even more difficult. If I was in another battalion I would -1 a full unban with a +1 for a reduction, so I am forced to be fair here and do the same.

+1I think he should be unbanned (assuming this appeal is something that is permitted or whatever time has expired - 1 month seems fair to me). As he is still active in the community he should be allowed to be in the community discord to talk with people from other battalions and see server progress such as the GitHub channel.

This. Also, I do not think expanding Dire Squad into a company is a good idea for 104th or for the server. I don't see why this would make anybody want to join Dire Squad, as all it would do would make it harder to get the lore characters inside it, and realistically Dire Company Troopers would do the same exact things that regular 104th do. This would just make the lore characters in Dire Squad more elite (since they would be in charge), and add a "wait time" before someone can get those characters (realistically they would end up being required to be trooper for a bit). That is the exact opposite of what Dire Squad needs right now. -1 I can read the future: if this is accepted people will later ask for a Dire Squad Trooper job since it's a thing in the battalion, and will argue that it makes sense since it's already in the server. This just seems like a way to slowly get that in a couple months.

I'd prefer more Star Wars music. It isn't difficult to make these musics discs, so we shouldn't settle for Halo stuff just because it exists already on the workshop. After speaking with Marvel and Xaze, I believe the media player just needs to be updated, then it should work again. Since the media player (at least to me, I was given no guarantee) seems like it should work again, I am -1ing this, since the time to add these in is comparable to that of fixing the media player (which is honestly a better solution that adding a bunch of server content with the discs, and gives people more control over what they have to hear during events). If for some reason the media player cannot be fixed to work on the server, then count this as a +1 even though Halo music only really "fits" for events; debriefs should use Star Wars music.

-1 no

-1 You can do this without a suggestion. Just convince a GM to do it.

How come I knew as soon as I heard someone suggested to make it a store item that it’d be you? Let the free-to-play people and children who don’t have a job yet have something rather than spending a whole car’s worth on Garry’s Mod roleplay. Not everything on the server needs to be a permaweapon and make the server more pay to win than it already is. +1 let Improcco have something cool.

Um sir, you are currently not caring for anybody in SOBDE that are not in position of power making them feel that their opinions don’t matter at all. Shouldn't this job be an SOBDE suggestion then, and not something that would go into BH? If it's used exclusively by SOBDE then it should be suggested towards their job limit. -1

Because 212th wants to implement something that will go well, saying they want to work with SOBDE. I can't imagine SOBDE would work against you guys having a great subunit if they were in charge of it as an outreach of sorts. If they were doing that, I have no question that high command would step in on your guys' behalf. If there's no trust from your guys' side, why should they trust you enough to +1 this? Also you literally said the Barlex and 212th Officer whitelists aren't used, and the GC ones wouldn't be used in this scenario. So you're not losing much of anything it sounds like to me, especially when in a couple weeks you guys will just suggest to add the Barlex model to another job, essentially meaning it was never removed.