Dyn

This.

I'm also a BH player. I'm not saying I agree with the argument, but I'm saying what most of them boil down to. People being salty (even myself at times) over getting gatted and then nothing happening even if the BH who did it gets caught. Things like aliases being so available that only a handful will actually be able to see past them. The bounty hunter coming back every 5 mins after NLR expires with a slightly changed name to do the exact same thing over and over again throughout a night.

Most of the time, the issues with BH seems more like you can't do anything about them until they have the perfect jump on you. Even if you know what they're going to do, you can't ever make the first strike. Sith on the other hand have their glowing red blades (which might mean jedi who need to use them would have to stop or risk themselves being suspicious).

The main post isn't advocating for that though? That's what people are commenting, but the main poster even wants them to potentially be enemy/rival factions from the looks of it.

+1 I think it could ultimately be interesting to at least attempt a revival after some time of them being gone. I know others have expressed interest and unlike BH/CIS which tend to be a minor annoyance to potential thread at present towards Jedi, Sith would offer an actual consistent antagonistic faction that fights on somewhat level field to them. I think it would need to be closely monitored by those overseeing it, but I see no reason why it could not work. The factions are not exclusive to each other. You can play a sith at times and play a jedi at others. Aside from the initial newness faction that might attract people, if Jedi lose significant consistent numbers from sith being added then maybe that would be more a comment on Jedi instead?