Reduce the christmaDC-17Ms damage on vehicals

[Ccmonty]

Name: Monty

RP Rank: WO

Suggestion: Reduce the damage the christmas DC-17m does on tanks. right now it 3 hits a TX and 1 hits a V-Wing. it is rediculously overtuned

Implementation: Reduce the damage to be in line with other weapons

[Ccmonty 548]

Name: Monty

RP Rank: WO

Suggestion: Reduce the damage the christmas DC-17m does on tanks. right now it 3 hits a TX and 1 hits a V-Wing. it is rediculously overtuned

Implementation: Reduce the damage to be in line with other weapons

[Stryker]

+1 I hate this as a battalion that's whole identity is vehicles

[Stryker 4]

+1 I hate this as a battalion that's whole identity is vehicles

[Arizona]

-1 I like my gun the way it is (:

[Arizona 151]

-1 I like my gun the way it is (:

[Marvel]

Thought vehicles took reduced damage from weapons unless this was specifically altered for the new weapon.

+1 regular blasters shouldn’t be able to do that

[Marvel 3,308]

Thought vehicles took reduced damage from weapons unless this was specifically altered for the new weapon.

+1 regular blasters shouldn’t be able to do that

[Juggernaut]

+1 I dont care for people buying Guns To overpower Vehicles just so they can always win (RPG/Rockets are the only Exception)

If we are supposed to be a lore heavy server then Bounty hunters shouldnt be able to kill a tank with shotguns and Snipers
thats why you have the Black market now

 

Edited December 23, 2024 by Juggernaut

[Juggernaut 121]

+1 I dont care for people buying Guns To overpower Vehicles just so they can always win (RPG/Rockets are the only Exception)

If we are supposed to be a lore heavy server then Bounty hunters shouldnt be able to kill a tank with shotguns and Snipers
thats why you have the Black market now

 

Edited December 23, 2024 by Juggernaut

[Ccmonty]

Just now, Marvel said:

Thought vehicles took reduced damage from weapons unless this was specifically altered for the new weapon.

+1 regular blasters shouldn’t be able to do that

tanks do take reduced damage from blasters, i think either 1/3 to 1/5, except from the 17m which does full damage

[Ccmonty 548]

Just now, Marvel said:

Thought vehicles took reduced damage from weapons unless this was specifically altered for the new weapon.

+1 regular blasters shouldn’t be able to do that

tanks do take reduced damage from blasters, i think either 1/3 to 1/5, except from the 17m which does full damage

[Stryker]

1 minute ago, Ccmonty said:

tanks do take reduced damage from blasters, i think either 1/3 to 1/5, except from the 17m which does full damage

The 600 damage sniper does 36 to AATs its a 1/200th damage reduction

[Stryker 4]

1 minute ago, Ccmonty said:

tanks do take reduced damage from blasters, i think either 1/3 to 1/5, except from the 17m which does full damage

The 600 damage sniper does 36 to AATs its a 1/200th damage reduction

[Zeros]

+1, quite bonkers.

[Zeros 315]

+1, quite bonkers.

[TimberedZulu115]

+1 

No blaster rifle should be able to take down an ATTE in 9 shots. That's insanity. 

[TimberedZulu115 4]

+1 

No blaster rifle should be able to take down an ATTE in 9 shots. That's insanity. 

[Conrad]

+1

Right now small arms fire does WAY too much across the board to vehicles. Its more effective to shoot your DC-15s at a tank then shoot it with a rocker launcher it feels like from a DPS Perspective. But the dc-15m holiday is just egregious vs vehicles.

[Conrad 2,465]

+1

Right now small arms fire does WAY too much across the board to vehicles. Its more effective to shoot your DC-15s at a tank then shoot it with a rocker launcher it feels like from a DPS Perspective. But the dc-15m holiday is just egregious vs vehicles.

[Banagite]

+1. Yes

[Banagite 140]

+1. Yes

[Upset Saint]

+1

[Upset Saint 91]

+1

[PJ_Manlius]

+1 though it was fun to one shot vehicles I can say it’s too OP. I would say that if we reduced the damage and had a higher clip size that would work. 

[PJ_Manlius 22]

+1 though it was fun to one shot vehicles I can say it’s too OP. I would say that if we reduced the damage and had a higher clip size that would work. 

[jugh]

-1 Liberal 

[jugh 145]

-1 Liberal 

[KaiserNeiner]

-1 you have a suggestion up for this same thing just worded different. I’d wave the white flag on that suggestion and edit it to say this, or void the previous one and ride this one out. 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

-1 you have a suggestion up for this same thing just worded different. I’d wave the white flag on that suggestion and edit it to say this, or void the previous one and ride this one out. 

[Ccmonty]

9 hours ago, KaiserNeiner said:

-1 you have a suggestion up for this same thing just worded different. I’d wave the white flag on that suggestion and edit it to say this, or void the previous one and ride this one out. 

that suggestion is for an overall nerf the the gun, this suggestion is only for a nerf to the guns damage against vehicals

[Ccmonty 548]

9 hours ago, KaiserNeiner said:

-1 you have a suggestion up for this same thing just worded different. I’d wave the white flag on that suggestion and edit it to say this, or void the previous one and ride this one out. 

that suggestion is for an overall nerf the the gun, this suggestion is only for a nerf to the guns damage against vehicals

[KaiserNeiner]

2 hours ago, Ccmonty said:

that suggestion is for an overall nerf the the gun, this suggestion is only for a nerf to the guns damage against vehicals

Yeah exactly. 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

2 hours ago, Ccmonty said:

that suggestion is for an overall nerf the the gun, this suggestion is only for a nerf to the guns damage against vehicals

Yeah exactly. 

[Kaner]

+1 agree with this but also what Kaiser said about voiding the other suggestion. Nerfing both the gun and the damage it does across the board is kinda the same suggestion that could have been edited into the previous one. I would suggest simply changing it to what Conrad said about nerfing ALL small arms fire against vehicles and potentially requesting a buff to explosives against vehicles so that people are more inclined to actually use the HVO kit and not their 100 dollar weapon at least against vehicles

[Kaner 61]

+1 agree with this but also what Kaiser said about voiding the other suggestion. Nerfing both the gun and the damage it does across the board is kinda the same suggestion that could have been edited into the previous one. I would suggest simply changing it to what Conrad said about nerfing ALL small arms fire against vehicles and potentially requesting a buff to explosives against vehicles so that people are more inclined to actually use the HVO kit and not their 100 dollar weapon at least against vehicles

[SilverCrowe]

+1 to this its a bit ridiculous the only thing that should be taking out tanks are the likes of the HVO kits/ Rockets or another vehicle not a sniper rifle  

[SilverCrowe 9]

+1 to this its a bit ridiculous the only thing that should be taking out tanks are the likes of the HVO kits/ Rockets or another vehicle not a sniper rifle  

[Eel]

+1 Only RPG Should  knock out a tank

[Eel 5]

+1 Only RPG Should  knock out a tank

[Badger98]

+1 tanks need this stupid that they die to a sniper

[Badger98 64]

+1 tanks need this stupid that they die to a sniper

[WarMaster]

+1 as much as i love my OP sniper its kinda insane that this weapons kills a laat in 9 bullets and a v-wing in 1

[WarMaster 195]

+1 as much as i love my OP sniper its kinda insane that this weapons kills a laat in 9 bullets and a v-wing in 1

[Caidoon]

+1 awesome stuff!!!! @Jayarrlets get on it!!!!

[Caidoon 176]

+1 awesome stuff!!!! @Jayarrlets get on it!!!!

[Wheezy]

-1 nuh uh

[Wheezy 80]

-1 nuh uh

[Wheezy]

If anything the damage should be reduced as a whole to 300-350 and raise mag to 10 shots

 

[Wheezy 80]

If anything the damage should be reduced as a whole to 300-350 and raise mag to 10 shots

 

[Tackle1]

+1 I dont see any reason why a blaster should be able to take down tanks so easily, besides, this change shouldn't effect the droid combat which i think is what matters most

[Tackle1 17]

+1 I dont see any reason why a blaster should be able to take down tanks so easily, besides, this change shouldn't effect the droid combat which i think is what matters most

[Juggernaut]

1 hour ago, Wheezy said:

If anything the damage should be reduced as a whole to 300-350 and raise mag to 10 shots

 

NO Small arms should be able to take a tank down its stupid and unbalanced people constantly complain about how the droids/enemies in events have too much health well they have that much because people like everyone who has Minus oned this suggestion dont seem to understand logistics and power creep.  And if you are worried about your BH not being able to RDM a Tank in a Base raid well WOMP WOMP! You should have worked on getting Renown so you could buy a rocket launcher from the Black market Or better yet Fight me in a tank you stole like the little Bandits you guys are Id love the challenge to fight a Player operated tank and then shake your hand afterwards for the excellent mech war

Edited December 24, 2024 by Juggernaut

[Juggernaut 121]

1 hour ago, Wheezy said:

If anything the damage should be reduced as a whole to 300-350 and raise mag to 10 shots

 

NO Small arms should be able to take a tank down its stupid and unbalanced people constantly complain about how the droids/enemies in events have too much health well they have that much because people like everyone who has Minus oned this suggestion dont seem to understand logistics and power creep.  And if you are worried about your BH not being able to RDM a Tank in a Base raid well WOMP WOMP! You should have worked on getting Renown so you could buy a rocket launcher from the Black market Or better yet Fight me in a tank you stole like the little Bandits you guys are Id love the challenge to fight a Player operated tank and then shake your hand afterwards for the excellent mech war

Edited December 24, 2024 by Juggernaut

[Ajax-Evo]

50/50 Im ok with this but to player/ npcs it should stay the same

[Ajax-Evo 98]

50/50 Im ok with this but to player/ npcs it should stay the same

[Ccmonty]

On 12/24/2024 at 9:51 AM, Kaner said:

+1 agree with this but also what Kaiser said about voiding the other suggestion. Nerfing both the gun and the damage it does across the board is kinda the same suggestion that could have been edited into the previous one. I would suggest simply changing it to what Conrad said about nerfing ALL small arms fire against vehicles and potentially requesting a buff to explosives against vehicles so that people are more inclined to actually use the HVO kit and not their 100 dollar weapon at least against vehicles

I have suggestions up for both because its unlikely a full damage nerf for the sniper would get accepted but a damage nerf to just the damage against tanks is more likely to. I havnt taken the other suggestion down because I'm stubborn

[Ccmonty 548]

On 12/24/2024 at 9:51 AM, Kaner said:

+1 agree with this but also what Kaiser said about voiding the other suggestion. Nerfing both the gun and the damage it does across the board is kinda the same suggestion that could have been edited into the previous one. I would suggest simply changing it to what Conrad said about nerfing ALL small arms fire against vehicles and potentially requesting a buff to explosives against vehicles so that people are more inclined to actually use the HVO kit and not their 100 dollar weapon at least against vehicles

I have suggestions up for both because its unlikely a full damage nerf for the sniper would get accepted but a damage nerf to just the damage against tanks is more likely to. I havnt taken the other suggestion down because I'm stubborn

[BUB]

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE.
(Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

[BUB 223]

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE.
(Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

[Mystic]

This suggestion has been ACCEPTED.

// LOCKED

// MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED

[Mystic 1,496]

This suggestion has been ACCEPTED.

// LOCKED

// MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED

[Mystic]

This suggestion has been COMPLETED.
(Suggestions that have been implemented into the server)

[Mystic 1,496]

This suggestion has been COMPLETED.
(Suggestions that have been implemented into the server)