Guac

This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO FORUM SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED

I have it cause im a superstar, go fuck yourself We have already prodded around ideas of implementation. We'll figure something out.

Implementation of this job would necessitate for BH and SOBDE to maintain consistent standards. Who would get the final decision when a disagreement arises? BH have never been golden when it comes to maintaining standards either, how will we ensure that lore BH would be implemented properly. There are more variables to consider, and I certainly do see possible problems popping up from adding a lore BH.

A bit confused, unless this is part of a plan to implement other lore "bh"? Also, because Walon and RC are so interconnected, it seems like an incredibly odd ask for this to be done with no explanation at all? Not to mention, that I think it would create un-necessary issues between BH and RC, arguing about standards and expectations for this sort of thing. I think the current; contract = using the model on your BH and the lore name, seems to work best. Is there any reasoning you could add to explain this decision?

Please at least attempt to make posts relevant to the suggestion itself. We really don’t need these copium fueled, “I remember when…”, yap sessions filling our feeds! Only respond to messages /or the thread itself to either provide additional information towards the suggestion, or to vote.

Question Answered

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Question Answered

Question Answered

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Question Answered

Ay im not the most active, but ive noticed some issues when it comes to people just getting a bit sloppier. Fuck ton of pre-spawned droids, npcs using t-21s, sims / other shit going on during events. npcs on props. These are all things that staff and gms had to avoid and focus on when the server box was shitter, but now from what I have seen, we've kinda just let these things happen.

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Question Answered

now? bottom of the list

vile and disgusting behavior. get this man banned asap !! !

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

It seems like you have a misunderstanding of how the flight rules work. Pilot JOBS will always have priority over NON-PILOT jobs; regardless of player pop. The outcome you want is already in place, you just need to start enforcing it. The playerpop rules however, are what stipulate for which jobs can have vehicles spawned. This is for server HEALTH reasons. If you want the broader rule changed of who can fly in general, that would require a separate suggestion.

As far as I am aware, don't support JOBS still have priority in all cases in flying? Like how medics have priority in medical RP and medbay, engineers in engine room, etc? Those numbers are the arbitrary line drawn to ensure that a lower density of people have the ability to take out a plane to reduce lag.

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Because of the mando belt, unless I were to go back and edit every Null model, it’s a massive pain. I’ll save you the trouble of waiting till 2025 for this to actually get implemented and deny it here.