Jad

This suggestion has been moved to DEVELOPMENT PHASE. (Suggestions that are being coded, set-up & tested on the development server to see if they fit the server and are without major conflicts)

This suggestion has been IMPLEMENTED. (Suggestions that have been implemented into the server)

During one of our last updates to the server (I think 2 or 3 ago) Vehicles underwent a massive rework to fix errors and allow first person to work properly inside them. The UI for Pilots was also tweaked. It may not be that add-on, but an update did happen.

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Left shoe is superior.

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

This suggestion has been IMPLEMENTED. (Suggestions that have been implemented into the server)

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

This suggestion has been moved to REVIEW PHASE. (Suggestions that have been accepted by the community vote or through Founder approval and a concept is being created by the development team)

Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Sorry, I only respond to Emoji's in this Thread.

Looks like it's working fine to me, but I'm also color blind soooo....

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Yeah probably. It's nothing to do with how many people are in TC either. I'd have the same response to even one job getting a Jetpack right now. Although I will be perfect honest, I'm pretty against anyone getting Jetpacks right now and that may just be because of wanting things to run more smooth, even if it's just a little bit.

I wouldn't count on getting a jetpack Bodygroupr for quite a while. We're heavily focusing on pushing forward with the rest of the battalions models and I'd rather not make a double back to get something done on one battalion that's already had their new models implemented. I'd also prefer not to add any jetpacks(entity) to jobs at the moment as we've yet to test performance with the JT Regiment removed. Adding more seems to be counterproductive at least for now.

Bind m "say /buyammo 4" 1 2 3 4 are all different ammo box sizes, 4 being the 1000 ammo box.

As a side note which would potentially change your suggestion. The CR-2C Is currently 300DPS(Which is the Event Job Tier), to make it fit in with the rest of the weaponry it would be dropped to 220DPS.

When we sit down and go through all the pending suggestions or ones sitting in already accepted after testing it's much faster for the team to use our automated messages for organization. The "Denied" option auto locks the thread and moves it to the denied category so we don't have to move and respond manually. We're very open to discussing why we deny suggestions and are more than willing to disclose information when it is requested. For example: The reason why the "Buff Heavy" suggestion was denied was because of us just finishing up the recent weapon overhaul and rework, so we needed players to use the new Z-6 first before following through with the suggestion. Easiest way for that to be done is to deny the suggestion and have people wait out the 60 days before suggesting something again if they truly feel Heavy is not operating properly even after the balancing. Another example: Model suggestions were all denied as we are currently working on a server wide model update. Doing other models at the same time of the overhaul would be a waste of time and money as a lot of changes are happening when models are releasing.