Jump to content

Conrad

VIP - Conrad
  • Posts

    3,675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    154

Everything posted by Conrad

  1. -1 this feels like a give us special gun so we’re special. No real reason behind why that gun. If it was something that fit for a specific reason like you’re all snipers so you get a sniper or something sure. But this is give us gun because we want gun, which isn’t bad but if we go that route every sub unit should get a special gun because gun to keep things fair.
  2. I thought this was off topic lel -1
  3. A concern I have for this is how it might effect the hitboxes of our models. Crouching and jumping messess them up enough as it is, I don't want this to just be a "always keep yourself tilted because you're harder to hit" sort of thing.
  4. +1 just wanted a bit more info on the characters! Everything looks interesting here.
  5. Hey @Brooklyn can you link anything lore related to these guys as far as wiki pages/pictures. I'd like to see some of the source material for them.
  6. +1, but i say increase by not 10 at first, but something less, and then maybe 10 in the future, its easier to slowly go up then it is to go up and then back down if 10 feels too op.
  7. I think this might have something tied to a setting you can change. Play around with the weapon behavior check boxes and see if that does anything and then let me know. Edit: I had someone spawn it in for me. +1 this is not very enjoyable.
  8. My opinion on what we should do. New star ever 200, giving a full tier every 1000 still. With each star you get a new title/rank.
  9. I'd be ok with a change in the names, but I'd like to see a mock of what you want them to be before I vote. I could see something similar to ranks working with a clean up on what levels = the next rank being cool for sure.
  10. I am confused, are you asking for the current ranks to be redone. IE BBstine is legendary, Brooklyn is freindly, ect. Do you want these to follow the in game ranks instead?
  11. So Obviously didn't know baron was envoy. But I think my point still stands here. This just isn't a good way to handle this situation. Basically telling someone to fuck off isn't great, and not being an actual staff member but having the power of SA doesn't absolve you of being able to do wrong with your position, honorary staff are still held to staff standards. Like i said before I don't think anyone should be punished for this, its not like they where doing something horrible, but just in the future say "hey that looks like it was an accident, lets get back to the event" instead of "looks like a you problem", would mean this report, be it warranted or not, wouldn't have had to happen.
  12. So while from what barron says the tac destroying was an accident, I don't think the staff member saying "sounds like a you problem" is at all warranted. Thats just not a good way to handle any situation, even one where it was an accident, and gives a poor look on the staff team and the server as a whole. I think that someone should talk to envoy about how to more properly handle a situation like this in the future instead of basically telling fearsome here to fuck off. Thats just not ever how you should handle a situation and envoy can take this as a learning experience.
  13. Biggest issue with this is gonna be performance. Lighting is never usually something that ends up well when it comes to server performance, have you looked through the comments for this, kind of hard to test on a single player map.
  14. -1 I like the high rpm low fire option. Fits the gun very well.
  15. How is this thing so small file size. Wack. +1
  16. Looking at the update log this was updated recently, just a couple days ago. Seeing it still being actively worked on I'd definitely say it can get thrown into the ring as a possibility. If someone provides more on why its still buggy despite being updated i will change to minus, but untill then +1
  17. +1, should be a mix of these between BH and event jobs. IDK about overlapping them but we got a lot of models here so i'm not really worried about that.
  18. +1
  19. +1 let someone besides 104th have it they already have something.
  20. -1 these changes are a lot better for knowing where things are. It might be disorienting to learn but the new system makes a lot more sense for the long term.
  21. +1 you don't close the outside part of your eye when you look down a scope. You still see everything around your scope.
  22. Good job guys. Really great. Keep it up! We appreciate you and all the work you do!
  23. +1. Between messaging me and your replies in this it seems like you truly wish to return. I can see the honor in that and the work you're putting through despite the initial rocky appeal. Just try to keep a bit more in line this time alright!
  24. I think this is a really good idea to get new players into garrys mod and our server. Right now it feels like a lot of people are “recycled” meaning old members rejoining. The problem with this isn’t that old members are bad, but sooner or later you run out of old members to come. This could be a very good way to get new players, and while I’m not an editor or anything I would be more then willing to give whatever I could to promote and progress this idea. +1
×
×
  • Create New...