Dennis Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 Name: Dennis RP Rank: Spec Reg Suggestion: Remove Naval Implementation: Remove all naval jobs from the active player base and pass on the trainings they do back to battalions. Also move CG back to Specialized. Lore: N/A Workshop content if applicable: N/A(If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Other: Now i hear people saying "Oh Dennis we cant remove them who will do all the trainings they do" well its pretty easy ill explainPilot & ATC > Mech Regiment - both 41st and 104th can work on this as a whole and keep the training the same way it is now, i've spoken with them and they believe they can do it. ENG > Pass it onto battalion ENGLs MED > pass it onto battalion MEDLs 3 1 1 1 Report Current: Kevin Colt leader of the Colt Crime Syndicate | Alpha-69 Dennis Former: BCMD Doom x3| Havoc Squad Brimstone x3 | Base Ops CMD | Delta Jedi | BCMD Colt | BCMD Bacara | Specialized Regimental Commander x2 | First Count Dooku and creator of the CIS | Rear Admiral Orson Krennic Link to comment
Fizzik Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 I've got plans that they are important for. Rule-maker and rule-breaker. Link to comment
Ecetera Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 some ppl have fun on naval and they like playing on it Link to comment
Centurion Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) I'm gonna -1 this for the sole reason that during my term as Fox. I have been working for both Naval and CG to work together more as a regiment like we're supposed to. However, (and this goes for CG as well) we need to be more active to really get that going. #weneedaregimentalcommanderalready If Operations does get disbanded though CG would be happy to return to specialized. (Edited to add my opinion.) Edited April 16, 2020 by Centurion Was a Fox I guess. Just an old Synergy vet. Link to comment
Brooklyn Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 +1 In terms of responsibility [ENG] [PLT] [MED] They have a very hard time managing it all. Honestly, if everyone in Naval was like Bro, I wouldn't mind it staying. But on the training side of the spectrum, I am tired of waiting for trainings and changes and possible wipes. Let the ENGL / MEDL / Mech Reg deal with it. Kal Skirata Bacta Marvel Brooklyn I beat Jad in a spar first try. Link to comment
Maddox07 Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 I want to voice my thoughts and maybe amend this post. +1 for example giving the responsibility of Mechanized vehicles to the Mechanized Regiments because it is SOOOOOOOOOOO much easier finding active troopers in Batts to give training's rather then Naval. However, allow naval to do stuff like run DB and Grant PTLs and walk around the base being all fancy, but I hate trying to find naval to do training or have to wait for them to host training it gets frustrating. Especially being told "You can only come when I host it" In that case some of my men can't make it cause they have IRL and it turns into an Welp try better next time. So thats my input. Link to comment
PartiallyBeast Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1. Naval is nice to have around Link to comment
Grief Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 but I would like for Engineer training and Medical Training for to be Battalion not naval ICEFUSE: SHOCK XO/BCMD Thorn | 327th XO SYNERGY: 41ST CMD/ARCL/GCL x3 | Former BCMD Gree Link to comment
Clutch Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) +1 naval is just rp Edited April 16, 2020 by Clutch 1 1 Report Kaiser Zeros Clutch Link to comment
Basta Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 Your Pretty much giving a middle Finger to the people who worked hard making Navel to what it is today. Now if you want to change the name every time map switches to Base ops then +1 Link to comment
Matt-Matthos Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, Clutch said: +1 lmao naval is worthless. Really? Link to comment
DracoOdinson Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 is this a joke? Link to comment
Sixta Posted April 16, 2020 Banned Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 How many reworks has naval had over the past year? +1 Link to comment
Levii Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 I personally like being naval. Link to comment
KillJoy Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 The monthly remove naval post is back 2 Report Current: Rancor Colt Past spots: 501st XO, 501st CMD, 501st WO Appo, TC Hardcase, 332nd office, ATK Reg Purge, Keller Unit Vinnie, General Luminara, 41st GCO ARCL Draa, 3rd Crosshair on the Server, Hunter, Sith Marauder TRO, GMM, VA x3. CIS Tac Droid, Guild Cabinet Member The person who made a treaty with the sith as a clone Link to comment
Neptune Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 This is a solid -1 from me dawg Hi, I'm Neptune Link to comment
Robb Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) -1 This is frankly insulting. Everyone in Naval has put in a ton of hard work to make it what it is today and we still have plans to improve it. If you or anyone else have concerns about Naval, Myself, Foxey, and Matt would be more than happy to discuss them with you. Instead of suggesting we get removed, try to work with us. EDIT: You never provided a reason in which Naval should be removed, I would personally like to hear it so that we can address these concerns practically. Edited April 16, 2020 by Robby Link to comment
Bro Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) -1, you gotta be fucking kidding me. This idea is literal trash and not well written at all, throwing away another regimental before some could fill it is cucky and if you plan to put a suggestion put some thought into it. People are returning, naval is reworking itself and getting better and you want to throw it all away like some thrown off idea? This is disgusting from you. Edited April 16, 2020 by Bro 4 1 Report Link to comment
Ratio Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 Didn't the founders say that at some point that if you suggested something too much then it would be insta-denied? I'm pretty sure Naval's been suggested to be removed like over three times. Leave them alone, bro. They're fine. Also your suggestion doesn't really provide a reason as to why they should be removed... 2 1 Report The Reprehensible Ratio! #RemoveJedi #RenameRancorToARC Link to comment
Foxey Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 sigh Hasn't this suggestion been denied enough??? -1. 1 Report Link to comment
Perri Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 -1 This again? 2 Report Former Commander Cody "2 Terms,6 months" Former Attack Regimental Commander Link to comment
Baron Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 32 minutes ago, Clutch said: +1 naval is just rp rp on an rp server? color me shocked! 4 Report Link to comment
Matt-Matthos Posted April 16, 2020 Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 I guess I’ll say what I want to say. I get it that naval isn’t the best, but it’s working it’s self out just like I’m sure your battalions have had ups and downs or maybe were on the chopping block. I see your frustration towards trainings and we’re on top of it but keep in mind that your battalion officials can also do the trainings. This suggestions has not detail or thought. Sure naval isn’t everyone’s thing but theirs plenty of people who enjoy it. I’ll definitely work towards a more accessible training system but flat out removing something doesn’t fix a problem it’s just going to create another one. We all have our issues and we are all fixing them just like naval. So this doesn’t come down to just removing naval and dumbing people’s post because they say they enjoy it. If you have a genuine issue tell us, work with us, help us. A removal is no way to treat something like this. -1 Link to comment
Retired Founder Forseen Posted April 16, 2020 Retired Founder Report Share Posted April 16, 2020 50 minutes ago, Maddox07 said: I want to voice my thoughts and maybe amend this post. +1 for example giving the responsibility of Mechanized vehicles to the Mechanized Regiments because it is SOOOOOOOOOOO much easier finding active troopers in Batts to give training's rather then Naval. However, allow naval to do stuff like run DB and Grant PTLs and walk around the base being all fancy, but I hate trying to find naval to do training or have to wait for them to host training it gets frustrating. Especially being told "You can only come when I host it" In that case some of my men can't make it cause they have IRL and it turns into an Welp try better next time. So thats my input. The same was true about both Mechanized battalions, as well as 91st before it’s removal. This is an issue of consistency and y’all aren’t keeping up either. 42 minutes ago, Clutch said: +1 naval is just rp Roleplay? On a Roleplay Server? How dare they... 17 minutes ago, Foxey said: sigh Hasn't this suggestion been denied enough??? -1. I have discussed plans for Naval recently that they’ve been working towards and I’ve been keeping a close eye on them. They are heading in a good direction. Also not going to remove Senators & Naval and have no Roleplay based jobs left on the server other than events as most of the player base relies on others to make RP for them. Seeing as though this wasn’t brought up to the Admiral or Marshal Commander, This is now DENIED. 6 1 5 Report Link to comment
Recommended Posts