Jump to content

Robb

Member
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Robb

  1. Yes this is really cool. However, I have used this in the past and it had a few glitches here and there but nothing super big. Another issue is that it is not practical at all, unless it is for a briefing for an event.
  2. -1 This doesn't just automatically "add rp". I also agree with Scarecrow's point: Ventress and Opress wouldn't operate during the same time as they were both under Dooku during different time frames. Doesn't make sense. EDIT: I also just don't think the CIS needs more force wielding jobs. The ones they have already, will destroy the entire unit that is targeted. It's not needed.
  3. -1 You either join a battalion to progress or you stay as a CT PVT. CT Leadership would be a complete mess.
  4. Robb

    Add proning

    -1 Proning is really buggy and unoptimized. It takes a while to get into and out of prone mode, on top of that it is just un-necessary and I am personally not a fan of the prone mod.
  5. The point of this is to give people a second chance to be apart of the community. People that were banned because they were malicious are staying banned; This makes sense in my mind and I don't see a problem with it. -1
  6. -1 Unnecessary
  7. +1 As long as you don't make the same mistake again. After talking to you, I believe that you have changed and I am confident that you won't "re-offend"
  8. -1 Reasons stated in Foxey's response I would much rather this over titan. however, this is just scuffed anaxes
  9. +1 No comment needed. This needs to happend!!!
  10. Robb

    187th?

    -1 I'm all for adding new battalions, however, 187th has been brought back on 2 separate occasions both of which ended with them being removed. Also, with the current state of battalions and server it's best to focus on our current battalions instead of adding new ones.
  11. +1 No comment needed
  12. -1 This is frankly insulting. Everyone in Naval has put in a ton of hard work to make it what it is today and we still have plans to improve it. If you or anyone else have concerns about Naval, Myself, Foxey, and Matt would be more than happy to discuss them with you. Instead of suggesting we get removed, try to work with us. EDIT: You never provided a reason in which Naval should be removed, I would personally like to hear it so that we can address these concerns practically.
  13. -1 Endor is just fine
  14. Me and Neptune get around 300 frames in single player
  15. -1 From what I understand Hisoka is working with what he was provided and he has plans for BH. However, If things don't get better after underworld... then +1
  16. nahhhh chief.
  17. 5th Fleet or Riot. We should use the Commander model(Guy with blue helmet) from this pack for the 5th Fleet model. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=716047419&searchtext=5th+Fleet
  18. +1 Love this.
  19. https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=1980900920 For all those that wanted the English Version. Also, I am gonna have to remain Neutral due to the fact that I personally did not care for the map, however, I do believe that it was better than Anaxes.
  20. Question: Why are we not on the Venator anymore, I know the server crashed but why hasn't the map been set back? Joah even said he was coming on to set the map in TS Global. Comments/Concerns: Staff Member you're asking: @Forseen@traditional Additional info:
  21. -1 I don't think there is really a need for this. If anything it would be to a heavy job or something.
  22. Robb

    New Cadet Models

    +1 slide things up a little
  23. -1 Personally, I feel as if the turret is too overpowered for dozens to be spawned by so many battalions.
×
×
  • Create New...