Jump to content

Centurion

Member
  • Posts

    92
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Centurion last won the day on April 7 2020

Centurion had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Centurion

Recent Profile Visitors

997 profile views

Centurion's Achievements

Forum Onion

Forum Onion (1/7)

69

Reputation

  1. I also agree with this. However I felt it would be easier to slowly rebuild and see how everything gets handled then to completely add everything and if it goes poorly we lose everything as someone can make the argument, "See it didn't work." I'd love to see all the ranks back, but I believe in one small step at a time. Let's show people that they can be handled.
  2. I respect this opinion. My only counter argument to this is that it has worked in the past. However it was honestly not something I considered. So that leaves room for thought. The main reason for this suggestion was to properly establish a senior officer corps like back in the old days. Instead of just having a couple of majors and commanders under the BCMD. Which in my eyes, can prove to be a problem. But to think about it for the smaller battalions It would leave some good empty slots in the middle. Like I said, room for thought, and appreciate the opinion.
  3. Name: Spartan | Centurion RP Rank: Sergeant Major Suggestion: Readding the Senior Officer ranks back. Lieutenant Colonel and Colonel. Adding more of a building block to get to Commander and having a better Senior Officer Corps than just a group of Majors. Why?: Personally I played back in 2021 and since then they were removed, I personally am unaware of when exactly that change happened. But from talking to people on the server I was told that the main reason a lot of ranks were removed was because of low server population. Well seeing as the server is usually hitting 90+ per day, I don't see the low server pop as an issue to keep this away. But instead of nostalgia onto the ACTUAL reason why. It adds the ability for Senior Officers to build and show their leadership skills before earning the rank of commander. It also really allows the existence of a Senior Officer Corps again. Right now we have a Enlisted, NCO, SNCO, Junior Officer, and Command. Major just feels like a buffer rank into command like how Warrant Officer is from SNCO to Junior Officer. A trial period instead of what Junior officers can go to when their not sure of something. How it should be implemented: I asked my BCMD on what the limit of Majors was. Cause back in the day it was 4 Majors, 3 Lieutenant Colonels, and 2 Colonels Leaving a grand total of 9 total Senior Officers allowed. In a perfect world you'd have a healthy Junior Officer Corps before you had a full Senior Officer Corps. This was also the days with 4 Commander Slots (including 1 XO slot) However, now we only have 2 clone commander and 1 Jedi Commander slots in a battalion. So my proposition is 3 Majors, 2 Lieutenant Colonels, and 2 Colonel slots. The Colonels would, as they were, the top of the chain before command. So 7 Senior Officer Slots in total along with the current 2 clone and 1 Jedi commanders. Implementation: Adding Lieutenant Colonel and Colonel into the rank tree. Let me be clear I have 0 clue about the coding aspect behind the scenes. IT could be simple, or it could be complicated. I have 0 clue. Lore: This one is a bit tricky as I don't think the clones used Colonel or Lieutenant Colonel in lore, but I also don't think they used most of the enlisted ranks or Major either so ya know. Workshop Content: Requires Development, adding the commands into the server along with having the additions to rosters. Other: Yes I'm an old player, yes some of this is nostalgia. I've talked to a good amount of other players about it and they've all stated their openness to the ranks return. But I've also heard that rank additions have been shut down for awhile. So we'll see on that end. If this fails, aw well. I can at least say I tried. Thanks all for your input!
  4. Name: Spartan | Centurion RP Rank: Sergeant Major Suggestion: Adding upgraded versions of the DP-23 Shotgun and the DC-15x Sniper rifle to the perma weapon in game store. Just how the DC-15s, DC-15a, and the DC-17 all have upgraded versions. Why?: Well I personally like to use Republic style weapons on my clone, and I know that there are people that do really enjoy their ARF DC-15x and their Support DP-23. So just adding some upgraded versions for like 6 - 10 mil imo wouldn't be that game breaking. We've already got a $90 RC Shotgun on the store. It just gives people who enjoy using clone weapons on their clone a bit of a chance for an upgrade. Especially when some droids have a bunch of HP and their sniper/shotgun feels like your spitting on them. Issues I see with this: For the DC-15x it does undermine the need for ARF's a little. What's the point of joining a regiment to get the rifle if you can just buy it from the store? My only counter argument for that is well you can still buy other snipers from the perma weapon shop. So.... that's the only counter I got to that. For the supports it's less of an issue as there is more to offer with it. They can fly, repair vehicles, drop armor etc. I don't think Supports major selling point is the shotgun like ARF is (in some respects) with the DC-15x Implementation: Tweaking the stats on the weapons to up the damage, fire rate, or magazine capacity to justify the upgraded version on the store. Lore: Uh....The Republic used both weapons and they're already on the server? Idk what you really want from me here. Workshop Content: Requires Development? Just some stat tweaks. Other: Just something I thought I would throw out there and see if people liked it. I personally am a fan of the DP-23 more than the trando shotguns and would like to snatch an upgraded one from the shop. Weapon id's in the server DP-23: rw_sw_dp23 DC-15x: rw_sw_dc15x
  5. +1 I think a trainee whitelist will be a good thing. It'll prevent minges being a huge issue when they get into CG since they have to dedicate at least 3 additional days to be able to arrest someone will get them impatient and removed from the position before they become an issue. And also using it as a training period for you enlisted to get used to the server its rules, and situations will be a great addition. Good luck with this! - Spartan | Centurion
  6. Already resolved
  7. +1 CG's been getting some love recently. I wanna see our Operations Brothers get some love too. @Freck <3 -BCMD Fox | Centurion
  8. I'm gonna -1 this for the sole reason that during my term as Fox. I have been working for both Naval and CG to work together more as a regiment like we're supposed to. However, (and this goes for CG as well) we need to be more active to really get that going. #weneedaregimentalcommanderalready If Operations does get disbanded though CG would be happy to return to specialized. (Edited to add my opinion.)
  9. Name: Centurion RP Rank: Battalion Commander Fox Suggestion: Add binders to both CG and TG Implementation: Would require to be purchased from the store by a founder and implemented into the server. Willing to donate the cost to have this added. Lore: Both CG and TG are the "Police" essentially of the server. Meaning that would have to detain people on a regular basis and make sure that the Detainee can't escape. TG would use this for other Jedi/ force users. I.E Sith. and CG would use it for the detainment of fellow troopers, BH, Naval Personnel, or anyone else that needs to be detained. Workshop content if applicable: https://www.gmodstore.com/market/view/cuffs-handcuffs-and-restraints Requires Development (Costs 8 USD however I will be willing to donate the 8 USD to get this implemented) Other: Both CG and TG would use this with detainments ONLY I have talked to both Skylur (Yoda) and Clutch (Cin Drallig) and both are okay with TG getting this added to them. Rules will be applied to both parties on when it is okay to use this an HOW to use it along with training, much like baton training, to make sure people new to having this know what they're doing. I do not know if TG has a code of conduct, however CG will be adding this to Rule #4 of our Code of Conduct in regards to the Baton being used as a tool, the Binders should only be used in DETAINMENT scenarios. Nothing more, nothing less. Abuse of this item will result in Disciplinary action and/or removal and blacklist from the battalion. (To anyone that has issues or concerns with this I will answer and elaborate to the best of my ability about it. just ping me) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  10. Does this mean Thorn will get an HP buff since we saw him take 5 blaster shots till he finally died? In all seriousness I'm not a huge fan of people getting extra health and armor just for their class. Sorry Cloud, -1 from me.
  11. Scribbles. I don’t know what to say to you man. I understand your wanted to see what would happen if you prestiged but mate.....you of ALL staff should’ve known better. You’ve had previous offenses and all were forgiven. Yet you go back to doing it. I love you man, a great guy to talk to and an amazing GM. However I’m a man who’s goes by a 3 strike system. And I’m afraid you’re out of strikes. -1 for in game. +1 for TS.
  12. +1!!!!!!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...