Kaiser\BCMD Cody Report

[Shady]

Your Name: Shady/BCMD Fox

Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:64853519

Your rank/position in the battalion (if applicable)?: BCMD

Battalion Commander(+)'s Name: Kaiser

Battalion Commander(+)'s Steam ID (OPTIONAL IF UNABLE TO FIND): 76561198253466298

Battalion/Squad/Regiment/Brigade: 212th

Why should this Battalion Commander(+) be demoted?: 1. Consistent Rule Breaking
Kaiser constantly breaks rules and has been recorded breaking them multiple times and when hes arrested for a valid reason he goes above me to get his arrest and his battalion members arrests voided. He has been recorded telling troopers to break server rules or minge on the server. Below clips will be added to show the rules he has broken. Kaiser continues to do this even after multiple reports to HC. As a final note the constent breaking of rules and no punishments being given is obnoxious and overall unfair in anyway.

2. Target and Baiting
While on BCMD Cody was recorded at multiple times telling cts to use vehicles they aren't trained for and telling them to mess with or target  CG and other members of the server. As a BCMD this behavior is unacceptable and shouldn't be tolerated. I have sent multiple clips to members of HC and find it completely disrepectful that another BCMD can act the way he has and still lead his battalion i have claims from multiple battalions with issues against Kaiser and how he conducts himself on the server. During his probation period from VA he used his bounty hunter and other members of his battalion that were staff to target CG and its members by doing multiple brig raids even after he was told by higher ups to stop messing with certain community members.

3. Other Members with issues. 
Multiple Other battalions have complaints against him the fear is reporting him as people beli and the general consensus is that he can get away with anything because hes Kaiser and its an unacceptable excuse to keep someone like this in a position of power. I know who the other battalions are an I ask that the come forward and share there side as well. 
Anonmyus- 212th members stated that Kaiser/Cody will get them out of any arrest no matter what.
Anonmyus- No matter what rule hes broken it seems since hes VA, GMD, and BCMD he can get away with what he wants in anyway on the server.
Anonmyus- I've tried reporting him multiple times but i feel i've exhausted every option.

Has this Battalion Commander violated one of the rules for demotion?: Multiple Rules 

Evidence against the individual?: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LGAiGro1TuEjJ/d1337fAQirTj?invite=cr-MSxVcnAsMjA1ODk5MTM0LA FailRP not following FearRP Guidelines
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1MBsQF4tGEZdgY/d1337vidshpy?invite=cr-MSxHb0UsMjA5NzYwMTU3LA Telling CT's to board vehicles and use them without proper training.
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LH79ip0yuWFW6/d1337JYSegoh?invite=cr-MSw3NDQsMjA1ODk5MTM0LA Letting a CT use the intercomm while allowing Obi wan to keep baiting it.
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LNyt2vSuxhxcW/d1337KNDJ4gG?invite=cr-MSxqcnQsMTk3ODMwNTEzLA  Kaiser Calling out CG for protecting their mastiffs and treating them like they're during a DB
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1MfJcoGZrZYQu8/kxrbTGuQoivi?invite=cr-MSxQZWIsMTk4ODAxMTY4LA This Clips shows Kaiser as a BH but shows how he feels rp applies to him when hes clearly tackled, cuffed and unable to fight back and chooses to fire back commiting FailRP due to FearRP.
Allowed the use CG player models without distinct permission from me or any HC CG to insight drama and cause issues within our ranks. This was an event that was done in spite of 212th being told to leave CG alone after some issues had occured that day although he wasn't apart of this as a GMD tho he didn't inform or ask mew about it at all. 

Suggestion for new Commander of that Battalion (OPTIONAL)?:None

Edited January 20 by Shady

[Shady]

New evidence found of Kaiser Balantly Crashing a LAAT into a building during an event. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/865453361532370945/1190765433117233202/Untitled_video_-_Made_with_Clipchamp_10.mp4?ex=65b572ba&is=65a2fdba&hm=80871fc919a4243acd35e3f45a4aaf3b0bb620e73de0c95c704a80c393223868&

[Bacta]

9 hours ago, Shady said:

Multiple Other battalions have complaints against him the fear is reporting him as people beli and the general consensus is that he can get away with anything because hes Kaiser and its an unacceptable excuse to keep someone like this in a position of power. I know who the other battalions are an I ask that the come forward and share there side as well. 
Anonmyus- 212th members stated that Kaiser/Cody will get them out of any arrest no matter what.
Anonmyus- No matter what rule hes broken it seems since hes VA, GMD, and BCMD he can get away with what he wants in anyway on the server.
Anonmyus- I've tried reporting him multiple times but i feel i've exhausted every option.

I know these are annyomous but these just feel like words, I don't wanna intrude but are these BCMD? Officers? Members of 212th? 

 

1: Have you tried to contact Kaiser about any of this? A commander report in most situations is a super last resort for a lot of cases, With a ATK REG @Joyboyhas there been a attempt at least? 

 

2:

9 hours ago, Shady said:

Allowed the use CG player models without distinct permission from me or any HC CG to insight drama and cause issues within our ranks. This was an event that was done in spite of 212th being told to leave CG alone after some issues had occured that day although he wasn't apart of this as a GMD tho he didn't inform or ask mew about it at all.

I know I dealt with a situation recently about this, did this happen again or is this from the same incident? 

 

9 hours ago, Shady said:

Evidence against the individual?: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LGAiGro1TuEjJ/d1337fAQirTj?invite=cr-MSxVcnAsMjA1ODk5MTM0LA FailRP not following FearRP Guidelines
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1MBsQF4tGEZdgY/d1337vidshpy?invite=cr-MSxHb0UsMjA5NzYwMTU3LA Telling CT's to board vehicles and use them without proper training.
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LH79ip0yuWFW6/d1337JYSegoh?invite=cr-MSw3NDQsMjA1ODk5MTM0LA Letting a CT use the intercomm while allowing Obi wan to keep baiting it.
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1LNyt2vSuxhxcW/d1337KNDJ4gG?invite=cr-MSxqcnQsMTk3ODMwNTEzLA  Kaiser Calling out CG for protecting their mastiffs and treating them like they're during a DB
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1MfJcoGZrZYQu8/kxrbTGuQoivi?invite=cr-MSxQZWIsMTk4ODAxMTY4LA This Clips shows Kaiser as a BH but shows how he feels rp applies to him when hes clearly tackled, cuffed and unable to fight back and chooses to fire back commiting FailRP due to FearRP.
Allowed the use CG player models without distinct permission from me or any HC CG to insight drama and cause issues within our ranks. This was an event that was done in spite of 212th being told to leave CG alone after some issues had occured that day although he wasn't apart of this as a GMD tho he didn't inform or ask mew about it at all. 

Im extremely concerned about the date of these clips, were you just holding onto this information to the report?  Some of these are from November of last year, 

 

Wanna reiterate @KaiserNeinerlike 99% of people on synergy are massively flawed I ain't dick riding, I am simple asking questions to understand this report more. 

Edited January 20 by Bacta

[Bane]

This report feels more like a personal attack over a concern with Kaiser's behavior. I have personally witnessed you, in both clips and in person, allow or participate in rule breaks. I saw one just last night where you and another member of CG shot at a hunter who failed a fake base pass role with no warnings or hostility on their part when they went to flee. I have also seen you intentionally look away from RDM/Unauthorized executions of bounty hunters. I very highly doubt that you are coming from a place of genuinely wanting to protect the community. This feels like a personal vendetta. The sheer amount of "Anonymous" reports without any sort of logged information, clips, or messages to prove that these reports even exist is very concerning. Also, as Mazen pointed out, some of these clips are old. It really looks like you've been collecting clips and data for the sole purpose of making this report. Have you spoken to Kaiser about any of this? Furthermore, many of these clips are just of him fucking around. The tower clip, for example, wasn't harmful to anyone at the time and has only been made an issue due to you saving it for what appears to be this purpose. To address these clips one by one

1. In the "Not following Fear RP" clip there appears to be more than one hunter in the room assisting him in raiding the brig. Fear RP applies when you have a minimum of three guns on you and are alone, not in an active combat situation with several allies in the same room to assist you, 
2. Telling CTs to board ships they don't have trainings for: There is no way to tell who has trainings and who doesn't, (In the moment without tabbing out of game, pulling their steam ID, and finding then searching the correct forms), first. I was ATAP trained for the brief period in which I was a CT recently. Secondly, that's obviously a joke that more than one person was participating in. 
3. In the third clip the CT hadn't intercomm abused yet. While he was certainly trespassing it is common to try to convince the person to leave over being arrested. Kaiser was not saying anything in the clip and there was a member of CG in the room. CG has priority over minor rule breaks, it was the CG's job to warn, escort out, and or arrest the CT. How do you know that Kaiser wasn't on stand by to mute the CT once he started the Intercom abuse? While I do not agree with the then current Obi-Wan taunting and goading the CT into getting into trouble Kaiser hadn't done anything wrong in this clip. 

4. The Massif clip. While the comments were inappropriate for a Debrief this is benign. People have said much worse in the recent past, Including CG members being elitist and lording over Kaiser for getting him arrested. 

5. The clip starts with blatant failrp from the trooper opening the doors. The only cases in which using a fusion cutter to open doors is allowed is with proper roleplay. Also, you in fact did not take or knock away his weapon. That's a failure of your bind, not Kaiser's. Any player would reasonably look at that and go "Well I still have my weapon in my hands".

The evidence provided here for misconduct is watery and unconvincing at best. There's clear evidence of you/the clip taker ignoring rule breaks of others specifically to target Kaiser. This whole thing feels disingenuous.

Edited January 20 by Bane
Edits for clarity and accuracy

[Shady]

24 minutes ago, Bacta said:

I know these are annyomous but these just feel like words, I don't wanna intrude but are these BCMD? Officers? Members of 212th? 

 

1: Have you tried to contact Kaiser about any of this? A commander report in most situations is a super last resort for a lot of cases, With a ATK REG @Joyboyhas there been a attempt at least? 

 

2:

I know I dealt with a situation recently about this, did this happen again or is this from the same incident? 

 

Im extremely concerned about the date of these clips, were you just holding onto this information to the report?  Some of these are from November of last year, 

 

Wanna reiterate @KaiserNeinerlike 99% of people on synergy are massively flawed I ain't dick riding, I am simple asking questions to understand this report more. 

In response to question on members.
These are members that aren't in CG among them there is some staff members which i will not disclose and members outside of my battalion none of the annyonmous members are in CG. 
I have talked with Joyboy and multiple high staff members about this as i have felt making a report would get them targeted or harrassed.
Yes some of these clips are old but I wasn't shown most of these clips until a later time until multipe issues came up. They may be old but they put perspective to the report and shows how he presents himself on the server. 

[Guac]

Keep comments consistent to the rules on responding to Commander Reports.

[Zeros]

As I'm looking at these clips, a good chunk of these are actions on BH. While this applies to VA, yes, these clips have zero weight on him as a BCMD. The rules are already muddy and just shows him playing as a hostile figure on a different faction, which is obviously going to cause conflict with your battalion naturally. 

11 hours ago, Shady said:

Allowed the use CG player models without distinct permission from me or any HC CG to insight drama and cause issues within our ranks. This was an event that was done in spite of 212th being told to leave CG alone after some issues had occured that day although he wasn't apart of this as a GMD tho he didn't inform or ask mew about it at all. 

Because it wasn't his event. He wasn't even a VA/staff at the time, being on suspension at the time it was run. This was one of my events and is what I do for any commando event: use the accurate models in order to avoid metagaming. Why would you ask the battalion to use their models in order to be commandos, which maybe a few hours earlier from this event, had metagamed your EJs immediately and refused to drop it, then breaking NLR? I wish I had a clip of this but it wasn't exactly the best standard of "upholding rules" from your battalion. As the GM for it, it wasn't spite for being told to leave you alone I can assure that. It was more an experiment to see if the same metagaming incident would happen literally hours later and how to adapt to such cases in the future.

This seems like a culmination of rising tensions between CG and 212th, and frankly the rest of the server. Are you sure you made this out of Kaiser's actions, or rather you grabbed evidence from whatever sources in order to make this report as an act of revenge? I'd also like to know more about these anonymous people you spoke to. I get the importance of privacy but how can we trust these people?

[Finn]

I just want to add here for context that for the majority of these incidents, Kaiser was punished for it or not on his clone job, which can't really be held against him in his capacity as a BCMD. I'm not going to say much as it'd come off as biased, I just want to make sure everyone has correct information.

[Shady]

4 minutes ago, Zeros said:

As I'm looking at these clips, a good chunk of these are actions on BH. While this applies to VA, yes, these clips have zero weight on him as a BCMD. The rules are already muddy and just shows him playing as a hostile figure on a different faction, which is obviously going to cause conflict with your battalion naturally. 

Because it wasn't his event. He wasn't even a VA/staff at the time, being on suspension at the time it was run. This was one of my events and is what I do for any commando event: use the accurate models in order to avoid metagaming. Why would you ask the battalion to use their models in order to be commandos, which maybe a few hours earlier from this event, had metagamed your EJs immediately and refused to drop it, then breaking NLR? I wish I had a clip of this but it wasn't exactly the best standard of "upholding rules" from your battalion. As the GM for it, it wasn't spite for being told to leave you alone I can assure that. It was more an experiment to see if the same metagaming incident would happen literally hours later and how to adapt to such cases in the future.

This seems like a culmination of rising tensions between CG and 212th, and frankly the rest of the server. Are you sure you made this out of Kaiser's actions, or rather you grabbed evidence from whatever sources in order to make this report as an act of revenge? I'd also like to know more about these anonymous people you spoke to. I get the importance of privacy but how can we trust these people?

Please see Rule #4B on the GM Rules and Regulations it states You Must have a apporoval by a CMD plus to use the battalion WL.
Secondly the people i have spoke with are members of the VA team SOBDE Rancor and 41st. Again i didn't share names out of respect for there privacy. 
Third the people at the BCMD position are held to a high standard and shouldn't have there behavior disregarded just cause there on another job. Balantly and knowingly promoting and allowing minging and FRP is against the BCMD Rules and Regulations and is shown in multiple clips.

[Zeros]

1 minute ago, Shady said:

Please see Rule #4B on the GM Rules and Regulations it states You Must have a apporoval by a CMD plus to use the battalion WL.

As per the exact words, "Use of a battalion’s whitelist must be approved by an Commander+ in the battalion", my event did not violate this rule. Even if I did, which I did not because I used the available models on the server and not the whitelists for CG, this evidence still doesn't apply to Kaiser as it was my event and he had no influence over it as he was suspended at the time.
 

5 minutes ago, Shady said:

hird the people at the BCMD position are held to a high standard and shouldn't have there behavior disregarded just cause there on another job

As a BCMD, evidence from a job that does not apply to the conditions and terms Kaiser agreed to as a BCMD. If all of the actions presented were on 212th BCMD Cody, then they would be valid. HOWEVER: these are actions committed on another job that isn't even in the Republic side. If we followed this logic, I would get demoted on my 501st SGT for getting arrested on BH or Jedi. You cannot hold one person accountable from their actions on a different job. While you are allowed to view them differently, they would have broken no rules as a clone OR as a BCMD.

[Bane]

8 minutes ago, Shady said:

Please see Rule #4B on the GM Rules and Regulations it states You Must have a apporoval by a CMD plus to use the battalion WL.
Secondly the people i have spoke with are members of the VA team SOBDE Rancor and 41st. Again i didn't share names out of respect for there privacy. 
Third the people at the BCMD position are held to a high standard and shouldn't have there behavior disregarded just cause there on another job. Balantly and knowingly promoting and allowing minging and FRP is against the BCMD Rules and Regulations and is shown in multiple clips.

Will you be doing anything about the multiple rule breaks from others mentioned previously? Will you be attempting to punish any of the other people breaking rules in these clips? 

[Shady]

8 minutes ago, Bane said:

Will you be doing anything about the multiple rule breaks from others mentioned previously? Will you be attempting to punish any of the other people breaking rules in these clips? 

People have been punished and other clips have and will be sent to find out who is breaking them. Yes there are other people in these clips breaking rules and they will be found out if able.

 

9 minutes ago, Zeros said:

As per the exact words, "Use of a battalion’s whitelist must be approved by an Commander+ in the battalion", my event did not violate this rule. Even if I did, which I did not because I used the available models on the server and not the whitelists for CG, this evidence still doesn't apply to Kaiser as it was my event and he had no influence over it as he was suspended at the time.
 

As a BCMD, evidence from a job that does not apply to the conditions and terms Kaiser agreed to as a BCMD. If all of the actions presented were on 212th BCMD Cody, then they would be valid. HOWEVER: these are actions committed on another job that isn't even in the Republic side. If we followed this logic, I would get demoted on my 501st SGT for getting arrested on BH or Jedi. You cannot hold one person accountable from their actions on a different job. While you are allowed to view them differently, they would have broken no rules as a clone OR as a BCMD.

As per the picture above you were using the CG whiteliste models you are allowed to use the commando droid cg model but you cant use a Battalions F4 WL in an event without permission from Commander+ of that battalion.

Edited January 20 by Shady

[Zensras]

 

1 minute ago, Shady said:

People have been punished and other clips have and will be sent to find out who is breaking them. Yes there are other people in these clips breaking rules and they will be found out if able.

 

As per the picture above you were using the CG whiteliste models you are allowed to use the commando droid cg model but you cant use a Battalions F4 WL in an event without permission from Commander+ of that battalion.

Do you have any photos of them actually on whitelists?  Because they were on 212th jobs with CG models.

[Shady]

1 minute ago, Zensras said:

 

Do you have any photos of them actually on whitelists?  Because they were on 212th jobs with CG models.

it was a commando event and they ended up shooting at my members casuing mass confusion on who to target they also weren't commando droids and I still never gave you permission to do be on the model or the WL. Of course there is no clip of this only the picture posted.

[Rohan]

Out of curiosity, has this been brought up to relevant high command and/or Directors prior to making the report? @Shady

[Zeros]

4 minutes ago, Shady said:

As per the picture above you were using the CG whiteliste models you are allowed to use the commando droid cg model but you cant use a Battalions F4 WL in an event without permission from Commander+ of that battalion.

As you brought up and I quoted, this is not what the rule states. No rule was broken by this event and it STILL does not apply to Kaiser's actions as staff or BCMD. During that event, if we were going to engage, I directly informed the EJs that in order to fire back, they must use CIS weapons OR be swapped to the Commando model. In the terms of the GM rules and the exact rule you stated, no rule was broken by using the models. We did NOT use the jobs.

 

2 minutes ago, Shady said:

casuing mass confusion on who to target

This is...kind of the point of a Commando Droid event and proves the infiltration was successful. 

[Zensras]

Just now, Shady said:

it was a commando event and they ended up shooting at my members casuing mass confusion on who to target they also weren't commando droids and I still never gave you permission to do be on the model or the WL. Of course there is no clip of this only the picture posted.

The rule applies only to WLs.   GMs can use models as needed.   There's a few models that are barred such as BCMD and the models used by Pixelcat. 

[Shady]

1 minute ago, Rohan said:

Out of curiosity, has this been brought up to relevant high command and/or Directors prior to making the report? @Shady

Messages and clips have been dmed and sent to Ollie and Marvel. 

[Shady]

Just now, Zensras said:

The rule applies only to WLs.   GMs can use models as needed.   There's a few models that are barred such as BCMD and the models used by Pixelcat. 

The Issues is the fact they used the models and started shooting. Once they took there helmet off they were still a clone not a commando droid and they were shooting at clones.

 

[Zensras]

2 minutes ago, Shady said:

The Issues is the fact they used the models and started shooting. Once they took there helmet off they were still a clone not a commando droid and they were shooting at clones.

 

What was the context of the event this happened on?  Insane troopers?  Parasite'd troopers?

 

[Bane]

Just now, Shady said:

The Issues is the fact they used the models and started shooting. Once they took there helmet off they were still a clone not a commando droid and they were shooting at clones.

 

1. None of this applies to Kaiser because he did not has staff powers at the time
2. Non-Lore Character, Non-BCMD, and models not uploaded solely for pixelcat's use are free to be used by the GM team. Commandos do not need to take their helmets off so long as they are using CIS weapons to engage clones. Until a new commando droid event job is created with our current models the issue of the model having a clone head will still exist, which is part of the reason the rules are written the way they are. I highly suggest you expunge this as evidence simply because it does not apply to the person you are attempting to report. 

[Shady]

1 minute ago, Zensras said:

What was the context of the event this happened on?  Insane troopers?  Parasite'd troopers?

 

Commando Droid event they tried to take over brig there was nothing along the insane and parasite'd troopers.

[Zeros]

2 minutes ago, Shady said:

The Issues is the fact they used the models and started shooting. Once they took there helmet off they were still a clone not a commando droid and they were shooting at clones.

From my recollection and from recently asking multiple of the EJs I remember being in it, nobody took their helmets off EXCEPT those on the commando models. Otherwise they kept their helmets on and used CIS weapons. Regardless, as I have stated, this evidence/event does not apply to Kaiser as a BCMD or VA.

 

1 minute ago, Bane said:

Commandos do not need to take their helmets off so long as they are using CIS weapons to engage clones.

This was recently changed AFTER the event that regardless of weapon used, a helmet must be removed. However, no rules were broken as this new rule was implemented AFTER the event was hosted.

[Rohan]

9 minutes ago, Shady said:

Messages and clips have been dmed and sent to Ollie and Marvel. 

And have there been any replies or indications of any of your concerns being adressed through those messages?

[Zeros]

Just now, Shady said:

Commando Droid event they tried to take over brig there was nothing along the insane and parasite'd troopers.

This was not what the event was. It was an intel grab on vital base systems such as BCC, ER, and THEN Brig. We originally entered as 21st/GM troopers and infiltrated the BCC, moved to armory and swapped to 212th, then we went to ER. Afterwards we PROPERLY rolled to find CG armor in the armory and then swapped to it, moving to brig. The armor for CG was chosen as it made the most sense for the area and also would've provided full base access. I'm not going to debate further on the contents of this event as it would be irrelevant to the discussion of Kaiser as BCMD/Cody.

[Shady]

Just now, Rohan said:

And have there been any replies or indications of any of your concerns being adressed through those messages?

None to my knowledge

[Hanz]

1st Clip: 1. This is on his BH not his BCMD job, I get your concerns about him but this is more of a staff thing not a commander report. 2. This by rule isn't fear RP because he has an Ally and never in here does he have 3 guns trained against one. 3. He literally wins the fight. Idk how someone can argue Fear Rp when they win the engagement. The motive behind FearRP is if someone is fully outmatched and its completely unrealistic that they would think they have a chance of winning the fight, but he quite literally wins here. Weird clip, makes no sense to include it.

2nd Clip: This is literally funny. Who cares? There aren't any inherent rules against this. He isn't responsible for the actions of the CT, and more than likely the CT was gonna do this anyways. This whole report is summed up in this clip. CG *nerd emoji* getting mad at everyone else having fun. 

3rd Clip: 1. CT wasn't even on intercom. 2. Kaiser didn't tell him to do anything. 3. You are right there as a CG, arrest him. Its not Kaiser's job to go into staff mode and arrest him while you are standing right there. 4. It's funny. Its funny when a CT goes on intercom. Its funny when they struggle to figure it out as well. Who cares?

4th Clip: Maybe not the right time or way to call out the rules, but this is not grounds for a demotion from BCMD in the slightest. The mastiff rules are dumb. How can you expect to treat any RP with those things seriously at all. They look so stupid and 99% of the time go around and bark at people. People are going to act mingey when presented with a fucking dog in star wars.

5th Clip: 1. on BH. 2. running around bind where more than likely on Kaiser's screen you were no where near him. 3. FailRp from fusion cutters. 4. Your bind sucks, he still has his weapon. 

Commando Droid situation: If there even was a rule break (there wasn't) its Zeros fault, and not Kaiser.

LAAT clip: Funny and he was already punished for that I'm pretty sure.

I get some of the things Kaiser does are slimy and he isn't always the most upstanding guy in the community, but you really could've done better collecting evidence. The things here just don't warrant a removal from BCMD in the slightest, and his worst offenses were on his BH. These issues are more of a staff thing, so a staff report would have been a bigger issue. There has been tension boiling from the 212th and CG and its very noticeable from everyone else, but this is not at all the way it should've been handled. I do think Kaiser need to be more consistent in who he applies the rules to and who he doesn't, but this isn't grounds for a commander report at all IMO.

[Zensras]

This report sounds more like a staff report and not a BCMD report.   Some of the stuff you listed (the LAAT tower thing) was already had him punished and suspended as staff.   Some of the clips were taken out of context and done by CG members who let it happened as well which is a...not great thing for you.   As with @Hanz said,   The FearRP clip was on BH and more than one BH was present. 

12 hours ago, Shady said:

Anonmyus- 212th members stated that Kaiser/Cody will get them out of any arrest no matter what.

Whoever said this either is not 212th or not in officer core.   All arrests are looked at context and we will punish if it is blatant.  I'm aware there was a lot of dumb arrest involving fists we cracked down hard.  I have removed people for arrests in the past couple weeks for blatant RDM myself as well. 

[Shady]

16 minutes ago, Zensras said:

This report sounds more like a staff report and not a BCMD report.   Some of the stuff you listed (the LAAT tower thing) was already had him punished and suspended as staff.   Some of the clips were taken out of context and done by CG members who let it happened as well which is a...not great thing for you.   As with @Hanz said,   The FearRP clip was on BH and more than one BH was present. 

Whoever said this either is not 212th or not in officer core.   All arrests are looked at context and we will punish if it is blatant.  I'm aware there was a lot of dumb arrest involving fists we cracked down hard.  I have removed people for arrests in the past couple weeks for blatant RDM myself as well. 

Even tho he was on a suspession from staff he was still a member of staff and he has to follow the rules. The fact that people are defending this action and saying it was a joke have no regard for server rules.

[Bane]

7 minutes ago, Shady said:

Even tho he was on a suspession from staff he was still a member of staff and he has to follow the rules. The fact that people are defending this action and saying it was a joke have no regard for server rules.

Your misunderstanding of the rules is extremely concerning to me. You did not strip his weapon. Even handcuffed you can hold onto a grip and pull a trigger, but furthermore in that roleplay scenario he had full access to his weapon. No if ands or buts, according to the rules he was well within his rights to shoot you

Edited January 20 by Bane

[Zeros]

10 minutes ago, Shady said:

Even tho he was on a suspession from staff he was still a member of staff and he has to follow the rules.

The first half of this sentence directly contradicts the second half, with all due respect. A suspended staff member is not a member of staff for that period. 

[Shady]

Just now, Zeros said:

The first half of this sentence directly contradicts the second half, with all due respect. A suspended staff member is not a member of staff for that period. 

A staff member on suspension is  still a member of staff they weren't removed they WERE SUSPENED KEY WORD

[Gohn]

For some clarification on setting model / using a job.

The use of a Commando model like the one in the picture is allowed using the string (models/tamewater/commando_armor/shock_ct/commando.mdl)
But if you where to use one of CG's models that would of needed to be cleared by their CMD+

Allowed


Not Allowed

Edited January 20 by gohn

[Zeros]

12 minutes ago, Shady said:

A staff member on suspension is  still a member of staff they weren't removed they WERE SUSPENED KEY WORD

Considering how, out of personal experience, a suspended member is stripped of all in game ranks, TS tags, and roles removed from the discord, they are NOT a member of staff during their period. It's essentially removal for a short period. Your actions during this period are not representative of the staff team.

5 minutes ago, gohn said:

For some clarification on setting model / using a job.

The use of a Commando model like the one in the picture is allowed using the string (models/tamewater/commando_armor/shock_ct/commando.mdl)
But if you where to use one of CG's models that would of needed to be cleared by their CMD+

Allowed


Not Allowed

This is useful information for the future of events and discussions but has only been clarified now, which is after the event was hosted and the rule was not changed/clarified at that point in time. In future cases though, there isn't an excuse for these actions!

[Zensras]

Good to see some clarificating after the fact,  Thank you @Rohan.   

That being said:  This is not a BCMD report.   This has nothing to do with Kaiser's actions as BCMD and more of his actions within staff team.   Some of the stuff was already properly addressed by the staff team which you have an issue with their ruling:

11 minutes ago, Shady said:

As a Suspened staff member you still represent staff your still apart of staff. If he would have been removed permantly from staff that arguement would be valid. Thats like being a police officer and conducting yourself in a bad manner on and off the job.

32 minutes ago, Shady said:

A staff member on suspension is  still a member of staff they weren't removed they WERE SUSPENED KEY WORD

The matter was addressed and he was suspended.   As a suspended staff member,  You lose all powers as staff member for a period set by high staff.   If you have an issue with how they do their rulings,  I highly suggest you join the staff to better understand this and help enforce rules if you have problems. 

 

 

 

Edited January 20 by Zensras

[Finn]

Ok, I think this is getting slightly off topic at this point. 

Staff issues aside, you posted 6 clips

2 are of his actions on a BH, which don't have any bearing on his capacity as a BCMD.

1 is of him standing next to a CT trying to use the intercom, which seems to be ok, as a CG member is present to handle the situation. I'm not sure what he was supposed to do in that situation.

1 is of him telling a CT about vehicles in MHB (and kinda implying the CT should get in it), which isn't the most professional, but isn't breaking any server or commander rules. 

1 is of him in the DB. I'm honestly not sure if that would be counted as battalion disrespect, though even if it is disrespect, a warning should have been given by you guys, and that would be the end of it. Based off the clip alone, I can't tell if any warnings were given or not.

the last clip is of him in the LAAT, which again, isn't him breaking any rules in his capacity as a BCMD.

I really don't want this to spiral into anything more than it currently is, so I'll just say that in the future if you have any concerns about a 212th member (even if it's Cody), please feel free to reach out to me and talk. I wasn't aware of all of these incidents, and quite a few of the recent interactions between 212th and CG are just bad communication on both sides. I think if we try and commit to talking out any issues we might have, it will prevent issues getting to the point where you feel that a commander report is the only way for results to be seen.

One last thing I'll mention is that, just because you don't think any reprimands were given, doesn't mean they weren't. There are a lot of situations (both in staff and in High Command) where an individual is talked to or reprimanded without it being made public. This honestly should have gone to Joyboy before being made into a thread, as he would have been able to tell you more clearly is if punishments were being given (which I can conform Kaiser does get in trouble for a lot of the actions he does on the server), and would have been able to talk you through any issues you have with Kaiser.

[Rohan]

For anyone replying to this thread, please ensure you are aware of these Commander Report rules listed in the thread below. 
 

 

[Guac]

This report is going to be locked until further notice.

If you have any additional evidence, contact @Ollie_ or @Marvel.

[Marvel]

what the fuck