Jump to content

Eclipse

Member
  • Posts

    1,381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Eclipse

  1. +1 BRING IT BACK BRING IT BACK BRING IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't even need the jobs - just rename the CT PVT to 101st PVT !!! LIKE GOD INTENDED!!!!!!! THIS WAS THE WAY IT WAS MEANT TO BE! EVER SINCE THE DAY THE SERVER WAS BORN!
  2. +1 but weren't there some huge, crippling issues with this that caused horrible server performance and them to be banned to be used? Are these issues 100% fixed?
  3. Eclipse

    the bron jame

    This is just funny.
  4. Eclipse

    Straight Facts

    OMG STFU!!!!!!!!!!!
  5. +1 but why have a quota system at all?
  6. The point he's making is that adding GC medic doesn't give any real leg up on 2ndAC. If you remove 2ndAC medic, it makes the role of GC medic more desirable because it's now the only subunit medic. Why would someone be a GC medic when they can be a 2ndAC medic instead and get a jetpack? Marvel's saying that gives GC more of a leg up, rather than them getting a medic as well and better guns.
  7. +1 When Gears before applied, I was hesitant and wary due to past concerns of activity, balancing roles, professionalism, etc. When Gears applies now, I can see that it is apparent that these concerns are all gone. Good luck Gears!
  8. you have them in the forefront of your mind at all times
  9. Dennis living in your head rent free 😂😂… take care o7
  10. +1 for the medics, this can provide cool new roleplay with special operation medics -1 for the purge weapons (if what Mystic said is true) I think this is a dumb reason for wanting additional things tbh. I understand where it comes from, but I don't think 2ndAC and GC can be (and should be) equally compared. GC is supposed to draw people in not because cool models but because of cool lore and prospects of special operations and the tight-knit squad structure. Saying that the quality members that could choose between either choose 2ndAC on the criteria of good model vs jetpack is IMO more indicative of a larger issue that needs to be resolved and that shouldn't be resolved just by giving a strong weapon to GC. There has to be something that allures people that isn't just a strong weapon. GC is sick as hell and you guys gotta use the other stuff you have to do that. You don't need a medic job and a new weapon to get more members and compete with 2ndAC! You can use what you have, like the interesting dynamic of GC and the interesting lore characters and the elite stance on roleplay to get quality members. If those members make their decision on where to go based on models/jetpacks, they aren't that quality of a member anyway! But yea a medic job would be cool nonetheless and pretty useful for operations and stuff
  11. -1 you're mentally ill and need to be institutionalized - seek HELP!
  12. +1 @Naffen Be better next time
  13. Eclipse

    Callout Post

    Mavelle when a popular character is popular because they're cool and featured prominently in a show and his 1 line character with 2 paragraph lore that you need to read a book to understand is unpopular
  14. +1 dog that had tarkin for so long bring him back!
  15. -1 Force cloak OR do what we used to do when I was Niner and just plan for having Etain around! If you and your omega guys are wanting to do some stealth with Etain you just have to be more sneaky because Etain can be spotted. Use your Omega who are cloaked to help you out! Worst case scenario - just ask for a GM to give you a cloak if you need it. I think having Etain have no cloak is a cool dynamic because it forces you to think and be creative instead of just going invisible too.
  16. -1 you're mentally ill and i cant trust a staff member like that
  17. +1 It feels good to get a little promotion here and there. Not every rank has to have purpose. Some can be there for fun.
  18. -1 This is honestly one of the shittiest takes I have ever seen on a commander application. How am I supposed to know how well you solved and are attempting to solve internal battalion issues if you don't say what they are? I have no picture of what these issues are. All I can see from the outside is that your battalion consistently has incredibly low numbers and is basically dead and is a husk of its former self. You say there were internal issues you had to solve and are working on solving, but what are they? How do I know you are actually doing that? In addition to that, when somebody asks you to shed some light on what those issues are, you flat out say no and say it should stay between those involved. I understand when that is a smaller scale issue, but to me, these issues seem large scale if they warrant you applying for another term to continue to work on fixing them. Not telling us the issues only makes me think you're hyping yourself up more to warrant another term, and in reality the only issues are the glaring ones like activity and server presence. I don't really have faith in your success going off what I have heard. I don't play anymore, but I have an ear in the community enough to see that it's not working. There has to be a change. Good luck nonetheless.
  19. +1 I always liked working, talking, and just being around you. I believe spec will feel the same. Good luck!
  20. Eclipse

    wooo 18

    we used to be so young
×
×
  • Create New...