Cylex Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Name: Cylex (In game: Fireball) RP Rank: SGM Suggestion: Replacing the current Arc-170 with this new Arc-170 Implementation: Subscribing the server to the workshop item Lore: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Aggressive_ReConnaissance-170_starfighter Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1923148152 Reasons/changes: > WORKING animated landing gear that auto-deploys based on height > Few neet skins that could add to role play > Speed and maneuverability are about the same (if there are any differences I didn't notice) > WEAPONS: - Forward twin guns were buffed to do ~120 damage per hit (the original did ~80) with a higher fire rate - The blue torpedos that fired from the wing tips was replace with a red rocket fired from the nose with a similar fire rate - The tail gun has similar fire rate but damage was doubled (from 100 to 200) [also has similar points where it stops firing because you looked too far a direction as the original] Personal Note: I wouldn't be surprised if it gets rejected for being OP or unnecessary, but I thought it be cool to have in the sever and at least I'd share it with y'all Link to comment
Naffen Posted May 14, 2021 Forum Admin Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 188 MB for just one ARC-170? Sheesh. Unnecessary change. -1. I added the Pepe emojis onto the forums Link to comment
Stockings Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Wow I gotta admit that looks amazing from the screenshots. But when I talk to Square he often brings up the largest lag producers on the server being the Lightsaber system and LFS. To add something this large on to the server simply for aesthetics is not worth the impact that it will have on the server. There are already a number of vehicles that are blacklisted from use like the AT-RT and some CIS vehicles. I think we should focus more on fixing those rather than add this for aesthetic and immersion. -1 1 Report People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719 Feel free to message me if you're having any issues! Link to comment
Arizona Posted May 15, 2021 Report Share Posted May 15, 2021 This would be very cool to have on the server but the only reason people are having issues with it is because of the size of the addon. If it was smaller id +1 this ASAP. But for right now its a -1 Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted May 15, 2021 Report Share Posted May 15, 2021 -1 While the ship looks rad, the size is kinda rough. Might be able to sit and talk with the dev team and change the one we got Link to comment
Bud Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 -1 file size is huge but concept is cool as hell my dude Link to comment
Dyn Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 -1 Everything I'd state is already stated above. Fixing up what we have might be nice first. Former 21st Formerly known as CastleClone Link to comment
Hanz Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 +1 I think the size is a little big, but can't we just change the numbers on the current ARC-170? this would incentivise people to use it over other ships for dog fighting because of the damage. I see most people would rather Dog fight with a LAAT than an ARC-170 Link to comment
Dono Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 (edited) +1 looks sexy as hell. Im willing to see what the smart coder people say about whether or not it would cause problems. Im willing to download the addon even if its large if it doesn't impact performance immensely. Edited May 18, 2021 by Dono 1 Report Link to comment
Retired Founder Forseen Posted May 22, 2021 Retired Founder Report Share Posted May 22, 2021 Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED// MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Quote Denial reasons:(These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.) Not providing sufficient information.Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use. The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).Ex: 35MB for one model. Majority negative feedback. Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server. Having multiple suggestions within one thread. Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion. Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial. Link to comment
Retired Founder Forseen Posted May 23, 2021 Retired Founder Report Share Posted May 23, 2021 This was DENIED due to; Large file size for a single vehicle that we already have. Link to comment
Recommended Posts