Mavelle

That's a hard one to answer in a black/white way, It really depends on the time and energy GMs have because it's up to them to organise. I don't have anything planned personally any time soon because of a FAT lack of time, but perhaps @Bactaor @Donohave stuff? But yes, I would very much like for more to happen in the future!

These new models look... Beautiful. @JayarrYou did a great fuckin job on these. Also this is awesome. This is truly awesome.

This is a big reason why I'm +1ing, but also a change of pace would be nice! Gameplay is really difficult to keep fresh in Gmod.

+1 I'd be lying if I said I wasn't doubtful that this stuff would get added because of how long models seem to be taking, but take that with a heavy grain of salt. I'm still finna show my support for these, because I think the server could really benefit from these being in the senate. Not only that, but you're a really good Mas Amedda, so you could make it work.

+1 although the other accepted music suggestions go back to June, I'm really not sure they'd ever get around to adding this :(

Damn. I thought that's how it was, but my mistake

-1 Why bother with piloting if you literally removed it from your battalion? Also, chances are your battalion will have the opportunity to request specific models when you're approached by the founders. At least I'm pretty sure that's how they've been doing it

+1, this will be very useful for less open-ended events and can really help out some GMs.

Apostrophes aren't used to make a word plural, you fucking muppet. You idiot. +1

+1, +1 , +1, +1, These would be used in events. These would be used in events. Please add these.

Yeah- we can't actually use it If it continues to be an issue we can count them as two maps for the 15 we'll be removing, but they'd be used if they worked. I can guarentee that.

For context, it crashes your game and sends the ES to rp_denon. Weird as hell. gm_buttes_2 gm_buttes2_night both do this.

+1 What? These look bad? Y'all on some shit. Maybe y'all just don't like how phase one troopers look, which makes sense. The helmets are stupid. But this model would be exceptionally useful for GM stuff!

+1 We already have the models (Which are great btw). Might as well have them accesible to EJs, right?

+1 Atmosphere is one of the most important aspects of an event!

I said dat already :( but there are only 4 duplicates out of the 66!

From what I understand Maxwells is working on a new NPC base. I don't know when it'll come out, but this might work in the meantime! +1

Name: Mavelle RP Rank: 1SG Suggestion: Add these two prop packs! The file size is literally tiny. I have some pretty shitty wifi, and I can download 10mb in literally 4 seconds. If download speed is the biggest issue, 4 seconds is the metric to judge this by. The SWTOR Prop pack in here has 4 crates that are duplicate props, but 15 props that are not. It's also 2.4mb. That is so fucking tiny. More props = more opportunities. You guys have seen how much inspiration the GM team got from literally just the halo props. One of the best ways to get people on the server is change, and people seeing new stuff being built will be inspired to get on! Implementation: Literally just add it to the content pack! Lore: Star Wars Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1524324218 AND https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=893317074 (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")

Name: Mavelle RP Rank: 1SG? Suggestion: I say we add this materials pack. It's made for star wars, the comments don't mention any bugs or issues, it's literally 5 megabytes. It would be a huge bonus to people looking to build stuff with a less shitty Gmod feel to it. I honestly don't see the negatives of adding this. Implementation: Adding a pack to the server Lore: Star Wars Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=756209791 (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")

-1 RDM Cases are a fucking headache to deal with. But it's not always because we need to know who did what explicitly, it's because most people who deal with cases like that don't really get how do deal with them. I speak as a staff member of 10 months, this is not something we need.

You may not redistribute this work anywhere unless I have given you explicit consent. I'm not going to vote yet because I don't know if this applies to putting this on the server.

Name: Mavelle RP Rank: 1SG? Suggestion: I suggest we add in this prop pack. The file size is 17mb, and I've tested out the props in singleplayer. They're great. Useable for a lot of stuff and they fill niches we don't really have filled. As a member of GM leadership, I have full faith that these props would get used in events and builds a lot. Plus, they're pretty high quality props, as in they look great. Implementation: Adding in a steam workshop pack Lore: Bases. Stuff in those bases. Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1912553584 (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")

Thank you for the quick response! I would also be very open to having a conversation about the event jobs.

Question: I'd like to know- what was the main reason for this suggestion's denial? Comments/Concerns: No concerns, I'd just like to know the reason! Staff Member you're asking: @Forseen Additional info: N/A

I think I'm actually gonna change this to a future +1. With the new situation with what maps can be in at a time, file size is not going to be a big roadblock. Because of that, I don't have much issue with the map!