Leaderboard

To put this into perspective for everyone, chambers is not a bad guy, he has done many great things and many of you have had good interactions with him before. We have figured out that chambers has been under a LOT of stress recently with both Finals for his university and running this server. Because of all of this (And running the community for as long as he has) Chambers has been lashing out at people for small things. Its not that he hates the community but more that everything is starting to get to him. So instead of removing him like some of you think we should do, we will be giving chambers a second chance like we gave to many other community members, like the community member who made this post. So in short, Chambers is human like the rest of us, once Chambers has destressed from everything, is finished with his finals and is ready to come back he will work as Director once again.

Ok big moron, the reason why at rt trainings haven't happened is because I got removed while I was trying to get them set up and running so that's just moronic. You are also one to talk about starting drama and other things. You've disrespected myself and members of my battalion to my face and seemed to get away scott free. Also 41st not doing a training would actually make LESS work for you to do eks dee. Spooky is a hard working member of the server and of the 41st. I know I've been removed and taking a bit of a hiatus but I will defend spooky on this. Also from things that Grum have said something along the lines of how 41st is nothing but degenerates seems to be leaking down to his officers and enlisted. Instead of making a player report that seems to be some sort of an attempt to kick up some drama and force something out, talk it out like you should and actually try and get things solved like mature people. FAT -1 on this thing

Here, I got some for you. Chambers as a Director alone scared me, this is why. I was having a discussion with him about why he would immediately deny a suggestion based on his own views instead of the community's, and this is what he says. This is NOT okay, I even immediately reported this to Square. I am not fine with this, I've been here for a very long time, and when our views are being trashed on by someone who just wants to see his way is not okay. And when I say "Okay Billiam" at this point Carter is one document deletion away from being worst. Please, I beg atleast speak to this fucking guy. +1

Name: IKE Suggestion: Remove the rules stating that we must leave feedback on a post and allow us to post memes without feedback. Sometimes I don't know what my actual opinion is and I just wanna post memes because I don't wanna take stuff so seriously. I understand memes being banned that are directed to a certain individual which at that point I just say delete the post but if the meme does not target a individual and is just a funny meme or post can't we just allow them to go? Like sometimes I don't what I think and just wanna post a meme, like sometimes I just wanna post yikes whenever I see a report or something (where I don't know what my opinion is) but that's not allowed. YIKES. Just to say again if someone makes a meme against a certain individual with bad intent then by all means reign hell on them, I just wanna change the rules. Implementation: Change the rule Lore: https://fanlore.org/wiki/Meme Workshop content if applicable: N/A (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")]

Now this, this is not just stupid. This is advanced stupid. You're going to player report Spooky for speaking his mind lol. -1

-1 this is only made as revenge which isn't right. You may not like him but this is not the way to go down with things.

Joah coming in with that founder dick beat down boi

[12/3/2018] Forum & Massive TeamSpeak Update I've been working on a lot of this over the past week or so, and this update will continue into the coming weeks, but I thought I'd release the current changelog up to this point as it's turning into a massive wall-o-text. I've tried to include most of the public changes but there will be missing pieces as the number of permissions reworked are just massive. Plenty of other updates and bug fixes are in the works, including new icons for the GMs after a very high majority vote for "Yes" to update the Game Master Icons. --- Forums: - Removed all Admin Ranks, merged into "Clone Wars Staff" - Removed sub-forums from displaying on index - Added "Clone Wars Staff", "Military Staff", "SCP Staff" groups for all staff under Head Admin - Added Forum/TS section for Bugs/Suggestions - Added "Retired (Honorary)" tag - Changed Forum Moderator Color to redpink - Renamed "Forum Developer" to Systems Consultant - Changed Head Admin Color to pink - Changed Clone Wars Staff color to blue - Changed SCP Staff color to green - Changed Military Staff color to orange *Probably a bunch of other bug fixes that I'm forgetting TeamSpeak: - Removed server/client permission view access from most groups - Removed security permissions from most groups - Removed channel edit permissions from most groups - Removed random SeverQuery permissions from most groups - Removed talk power from most groups (Use Staff/Base Groups) - Removed "Bypass" Server Group for permission rework - Removed unused Honorary channels - Removed all Honorary sub-channels - Removed Founders from Channel Admin to minimize tag interference - Added default spacers for basic organization - Added "Battalion Trainer" tag, can assign all basic battalion tags, cannot any remove tags (CMDRs can assign this) - Added "Channel Key" Channel Group to replace Bypass on a channel level - Added "Helper" tag; can only be assigned by Founders for user(s) assisting in development efforts - Reorganized most channel categories, channel headers, and server group sortids - Remade all battalion tags, including battalions, jedi, senator, naval, admiral, yoda, mace, jedi master, commander, and high command with a consistent permission system * These will be reassigned throughout the week by Commanders and Head Admins+ - Fixed "Channel Admin", can edit/modify channels, ignore passwords, and kick from channel under HA - Fixed "Guest" tag, can only join Battalion Training rooms, basic speak/message permissions - Fixed all Staff Tags (New Admin -> Director) permissions - Fixed all RP tag permissions - CW Command/High Command tags can only be assigned by Head Admin+ - CW Battalion tags can be assigned by Battalion Trainers and all CW Command - CW Jedi tags can be assigned by Jedi Masters and all CW Command - CW Naval tags can be assigned by Admiral and all CW Command *Probably a bunch of other bug fixes that I'm forgetting

That's the rule just as an fyi. You can post a meme you just need to add feedback with it. Also -1. If you want to post a meme go to the off topic area.

+1 we should be allowed to meme ALONG WITH a VALID response

+1 stop restricting our memes. Freedom to the meme! #vivalameme

+1

Neutral. Yes I agree, but its for that person. I would say leave Server Suggestions and Commander amd staff stuff out, but Ban appeals and Reports are fair game

Isn't something we need right now considering we have to fully develop it. Maybe is you remake the suggestion and help link a developer that could do this that would be better. Very good idea though, just needs more thinking to it. @Ccmonty DENIED //Locked //Moved to Server Suggestions - Denied

Thank you @Esitt

Voided as per request of the author By the way this report had nothing to back it up, Spooky hasn't done anything wrong. //Locked //Moved to Player Reports - Completed Reports

There's no need to convince anyone if it's true. There's just little specks of it here and there, nothing on a scale of Billiam but the bullshit sure stacks up high. - To add to the Grum situation, how is he even still BCMD if he behaves as such? This is supposed to be a community, right?

-1 ARQ stands as a test to see if you're competent for recon action, it's nothing hard, and can even help you think about what you're doing in recon situations, such as the second portion of the training. Plus, RANCOR HAS PRIORITY OVER MANAGING ARC. If they want a training to go in, they make it go in. IT IS NOT A COMMUNITY DECISION. Same applies to 91st over ARF. We were planning to rework ARF training anyway, but was reworked into ARQ when several high command came to us and talked out the idea. None of you are even giving it a chance, just bashing it because you don't like change, and possibly bandwagoning. (Also, complaining that only ARF and ARC can ride barcs... yeah, that was the plan from the ground up. That's 91st's decision to make. We don't want everyone and their mothers getting BARC training and thinking their entitled to shit.)

I went through ARQ. Its fun, but i'd prefer it not being Mandatory for ARC. Neutral as i wouldn't wanna see it removed, but i dont want to see it being mandatory for ARC. It's a fun training.

Null still have to go to selections just like any other ARC trooper they are still ARC troopers. Only ARC and ARF will be able to use those vehicles as they are RECON vehicles that suit the jobs and allows a unique thing to be added to them. It's the same thing that is happening to Pilots. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 91st Can do whatever the fuck it wants to make it so people can use their BARCS (No one could use them at all before this) (Without Game Master Perms)) 91st Controls ARF training already??? 41st Can do whatever the fuck it wants to make it so people can use their AT-RTs (The inclusion in ARQ was optional Egg was the one that worked with Grum on this and added AT-RT to ARQ) (No one could use them at all before this (Without Game Master Perms)) 104th Can do whatever the fuck it wants to make it so people can use their TX-130s (Without Game Master Perms)) RANCOR can strip ARC and modify selections all they want it's their battalions thing. 91st already controlled ARF training they just made it scheduled to 4 times a week and only takes 30 mins in smaller groups and an hour for large groups then you are done ARQ. (ARC takes 3 hours to get everything and longer if you fail and is once maybe twice a week) What truly pissed me off about this suggestion is the fact that 90% of the people +1 did not attend or give it a chance when there has only been one ARQ and it was an hour and a half ago. 91st poured their heart and soul into making ARF training more fun and incorporate BARC training so everyone could get the training in a quick 30mins a be on their way and be able to begin to use BARCs on the patrol. While I will admit I did act badly the first time I will not make an excuse for it. If people want to try to make a legitimate change to improve the server and the community I will defend them to the death because they are the people that will make a change for the betterment of the community. "those that try do, but those that do not try, do nothing" If you do not like that fact that it is a requirement for ARC then make that suggestion, do not shit on the effort of 91st who actually made something fun for people to do that hardly takes any time.

+1 I believe this report is extremely valid through the points made by both Spooky and Bbstine with their evidence regarding the topic at hand. This is not how someone in a high leadership position should be acting when leading a community of people. I would not want someone with an autocratic mindset like this as a manager or supervisor. I don't believe a removal is necessary if Chambers is willing to change his point of view on the community. Of course this should be some sort of strike and if this issue is to persist then removal action should be taken. However, I certainly would not want to be staff under the power of this person nor would I be inclined to ever want to join staff under this director.

+1, that image from Bbstine severely reduces my trust in Chambers, I don't feel like he has our interests in heart and he makes the decisions for us with out us letting us have a proper discussion (This is not about ARQ but another instance involving Ranks to leave base and so on).

Could W&T, Leadership & Selections be for ARC. Then to be an ARCL/ARCO in any Battalion have extensive training such as ARQ?

-1, the whole purpose behind this is to get everyone trained for ARF Barc and other recon tactics. The decision to make it a prerequisite to ARC was mine. IMO the 91st have a right to make their training how they want it. It would be like telling 41st that they cant make AT-RT a certain way or Rancor how they have to do ARC training a certain way. ARC is made up of three separate training regiments, and yet no one complains, yet a 1-hour training is too much for people to handle. Man up and stop complaining.

WE ARE NOT ICEFUSE LET US SPEAK

I'm going to unlock this for further feedback from the community if it's not something that's wanted it should go out the door. No reason to push it if everyone dislikes it. I'll keep this thread open for now just for further review and other perspectives. -Thanks -Founders

+1, there's already enough to do with ARC.

+1 there was no community input when it was added and so far the feedback has been negative. This is not Icefuse , the first thing u see when you load in is= Made by the players for the players so why cant we voice our opinions? Thx Joah ARQ