Jump to content

Forseen

Retired Founder
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,465

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    48

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Forseen

  4. Wreckers Fist

    in Denied

    Posted

    Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED.

    If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied.

    // LOCKED
    // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

     

    DENIED as we don't want to make a copy of a VIP item to give to any job, let alone a job that doesn't require you to be VIP.
    However, we are currently looking at finding an alternative.
     

    Quote

    Denial reasons:
    (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.)

    • Not providing sufficient information.
      Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use.
    • The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).
      Ex: 35MB for one model.
    • Majority negative feedback.
    • Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server.
    • Having multiple suggestions within one thread.
    • Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion.
    • Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial.

     

    • Agree 1
    • Funny 2
    • Winner 1

  10. AFK system

    in Denied

    Posted

    Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED.

    If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied.

    // LOCKED
    // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

     

    Denied because it will cause constant player checks and MAJORLY increase server performance for a minor change.
     

    Quote

    Denial reasons:
    (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.)

    • Not providing sufficient information.
      Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use.
    • The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).
      Ex: 35MB for one model.
    • Majority negative feedback.
    • Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server.
    • Having multiple suggestions within one thread.
    • Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion.
    • Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial.

     

  11. Giving Rancor Heavy a PLX.

    in Denied

    Posted

    Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED.

    If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied.

    // LOCKED
    // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

     

    Denied as the Rancor heavy has the standard heavy loadout that all battalions have & there's a weapon rework coming up.
     

    Quote

    Denial reasons:
    (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.)

    • Not providing sufficient information.
      Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use.
    • The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).
      Ex: 35MB for one model.
    • Majority negative feedback.
    • Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server.
    • Having multiple suggestions within one thread.
    • Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion.
    • Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial.

     

  17. Mediaplayer Use Rule

    in Denied

    Posted

    Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED.

    If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied.

    // LOCKED
    // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
     

    Quote

    Denial reasons:
    (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.)

    • Not providing sufficient information.
      Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use.
    • The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s).
      Ex: 35MB for one model.
    • Majority negative feedback.
    • Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server.
    • Having multiple suggestions within one thread.
    • Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion.
    • Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial.

     

  21. staff problems

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    8 hours ago, Brooklyn said:

    So. Not trying to sounds dumb, but I am genuinely curious. It shouldn't be hard to be completely transparent if the decisions that are made have actual reason and evidence behind it. So does that mean you can't be transparent because you do not want to? Or because some decisions are just straight shady?

    That's a very fair question,

     

    There's a lot of discussion that happens and quite often there are negatives brought up about people that the community may not see as they are not looking at the situation from the same angle as our high staff members are, and because of that we inform the person that was discussed about those negatives and choose not to disclose that information so to not talk negatively about our staff team to the rest of the community.

     

    In terms of server-wide decisions, a lot of the time we do attempt to communicate with the appropriate parties about their upcoming changes however we generally see a lack of interest, lack of communication or lack of cooperation when discussing potential upcoming changes.

    Two recent examples are the Jedi Order, in which initially very few members of the Jedi Council were assisting me when I was looking at potential changes to the WiltOs system FOR THEM. They have since come back around and are now helping out.

    The second example is the potential change coming to SOBDE that we asked them to keep as an in regiment discussion so that we can work with them for the potential changes and also that we would talk to the rest of the community when things have been finalized so there was no misinformation but within literal minutes of us leaving the channel, most of the community knew about it.

     

    To summarize for you, there are always reasons and we are open to telling you why we haven't been super transparent on some decisions. A lot of you are still on high alert about the new founders since Joah and the old Founders have left and are still weary about us, in which we understand, however we are here working to better the community, not to fuck you guys over.

    • Winner 3

  22. staff problems

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    13 minutes ago, Cox said:

    I think one thing I have heard from a lot of people is that there were candidates that they all thought were better for director from an outside community standpoint, another thing that I have heard is that there are changes that are added that no one really asked for nor did they want because they were not needed whatsoever so those things should matter basically what people have said is that community voting and feedback should have more of an impact in changes that are coming or being added that not a lot of people want 

    It's hard to listen to community feedback, when we have many ways in which we take the feedback in, but none of them ever get used until there's a public complaint made that everyone jumps on board with, such as this post. The feedback in which we are receiving here is actually quite decent, it's just a shame that the avenues we supply aren't used until it all piles up. For example, the staff feedback form that Gadget linked, has two responses in 3 months, yet there have been all these issues that came up out of nowhere?

    Some people that are great at using these systems we have in place are people like Ratio, Crimson b.d(Before Director), Wolfro b.d, Freck b.d, Baron, Marvel, Mitchell & Foxey. This is one of the main things that is looked at by our High Staff & Community Management teams are the people that are able to, not just provide honest feedback positive or negative, but also be apart of the solution to the issue in any way that they possibly can.

    There are a lot of different factors that go into the decision making of who gets a position in the High Staff team and there are always ways people can improve, however the High Staff team does a great job at communicating with people of the issues that are seen from the perspective of the team, aspects of their work that they do well and helping guide them along the way of where they would need to be to be able to move up. There's logs of this happening every single week with who was spoken to and what about dating back to the start of the community. However, the things that we speak to people about are usually kept between the High Staff team and the individual and it is generally up to them if they'd like to disclose the information that they were given and most of the time they don't.

    Yes there will be people that get overlooked and may miss out, however you have to remember, we are all human and we can't watch everyone all the time but we have systems in place to try and help us see as much as we can when it comes to our staff team to give the fairest assessments possible when deciding on promotions & demotions.

    I agree we are a community and communication needs to improve like most of you have all said, but communication is not a one-way road and needs to come from both ends, and there has to also be an understanding that we cannot always be as transparent as some of you may like either, however we do give you as much information as we can as much as we can.

    • Winner 4

  23. staff problems

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Finn said:

    It'd be nice to have a bit more perspective into what sort of criteria goes into some of the more important decisions. Not 'explain why X person got it and Y didn't', but a general 'this is what we're looking for'.

    This was made a while ago, however it has been updated throughout the last year whenever the expectations have changed to accommodate the current High Staff team.

    5 hours ago, Finn said:

    Edit: Also unrelated but to whichever forum mod is hiding posts and not telling us why, can you not please? It's real annoying to not break a rule, have a post hidden, and not be told why.

    That would be me. The posts I'm hiding are all unrelated to the topic. As this is a General Discussion post, it helps when the discussion is on topic. Memes have a place in all our hearts, but on the forums that place is off topic.

    Side note: Some of them are pretty funny though.

  24. Zen's Commander Cody Application

    in Denied

    Posted

    This application has been VOIDED by the author.

    You are permitted to put up another application for other positions, however;

    If you void another commander application within 30 DAYS, then you're subject to a 30 DAY cooldown from applying.

    // LOCKED
    // MOVED TO COMMANDER APPLICATIONS - DENIED

×
×
  • Create New...