Forseen

I'm wanting to keep the forums clean and not have a huge amount of reactions, therefore I'm going to be denying this. Sorry!

This suggestion is still open for discussion, My thoughts; I agree with Square here, VA's are supposed to be the more mature & rolemodel members of the staff team that are being looked at for a potential Head Admin position and if are requested to move to another channel wouldn't have an issue with it. If they are being unreasonable or being immature then they can always be reported up in the CoC. I don't feel this is needed at all. Thoughts & Votes?

This suggestion is still open for discussion, My thought process is that this is unneded now due to the public Game Master Discord as it's easier to throw a discord ping than to pull people with a tag. This would also have to be a tag that is assigned by a certain rank and that rank needs to be trusted to verify the member's VIP status in-game and not just give it out on a "I trust them" basis. On top of this, if someone enjoys being an Event Job but is busy doing something and they get pulled it can create a LOT of complications. Thoughts?

Accepted

Almost certain that this has been resolved due to amount of time past. If not, please create a new report :)

ACCEPTED AND ADDED @Neptune

ACCEPTED AND ADDED @Maverick

Question Answered

This has been acknowledged and either fixed or is listed to be fixed. // LOCKED // MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGED REPORTS

It serves as a good teaching point for new players for how to use the permaweapon vendor :)

Alright, so I'm going to DENY this appeal. Not only have you clearly and blatantly broken the rules by using a glitch to get out of your cell when you were arrested, along with a whole slue of other offences, as seen in the post made by Jack (below). But you also broke the ban appeal rules, as shown by Guac's post (below). Within this appeal you have reacted to everyone that voted -1 with a disagree, commented multiple times with things such as; as well as a few others. Personally I feel like you got let off easy with only having a 7 day ban & you're lucky it wasn't longer. Please use this time to think on your actions and how they caused you to be in this position. Hopefully you can use this ban as learning experience. //LOCKED //MOVED TO APPEALS DENIED

Suggestion has been DENIED due to Negative Community Feedback. // LOCKED // MOVED TO DENIED SUGGESTIONS

This has been acknowledged and either fixed or is listed to be fixed. // LOCKED // MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGED REPORTS

Acknowledged

Spawn has been set. // LOCKED // MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGED REPORTS

To give you perspective - These are 3 models with different color options on each one. Colors don't make up 10 MB per color...

Please explain what issue you're talking about? One of the main issues, as stated in my post, is the unity of the sub-units. There's no battalion cohesion, this would decrease battalion unity. The argument of "promised models" was brought up by a member of 21st that was defending this suggestion by using that exact point. My post was simply explaining that it was incorrect and was never actually promised. Currently Jet is not a job on the server. Meaning it's only a named title given to a player by the 21st BCMD. So there's no real waste of potential when there's no job anyway? This suggestion is to replace Shadow Company (A non-official sub-unit, without jobs or models) with Jet's Unit (In which you want Jobs and Models). You're asking to add in an official sub-unit that has models...

You were never "owed models". The Directors at the time were @Fizzik & Mitchell, there was a store credit reward and 3 extra-permaprops in your bunks (Which the 21st took as 5 props extra for some reason.) and @Qal, who was BACARA at the time, said he would attempt to make contact with Joah about getting models made instead of the store credit (See the image below.). Please learn your facts before you start acting entitled.

I have two main issues with this suggestion. Issue one: 21st's currently has two sub-units that have models and jobs, Keller's Unit & Special Operations. This is the same amount other battalions have and have been allowed since the beginning of the server. The issue arises where you wish to take a sub-unit that has no model difference or job difference & replace it with a whole new set of models and jobs. This will put 21st at a point where they have 21st/GM | Special Operations | Keller's Unit | Jet's Unit, all separated out in different jobs. Keep in mind, 212th attempted to have Ghost Company added in and everyone also shit on that idea too. Issue two: Currently the biggest issue within 21st, as per discussion with High Command, including Marshal Commander @NobleHeoruwulf, Specialized Regimental Command (and Ex-21st Commander) @Gadget & even the new BCMD @Oxen, is that there is no unity within the battalion and the sub-units are very divided. By adding in another unit, we are pushing the unity of 21st and the cohesiveness of a battalion that is meant to be working together as one unit, further and further away to grow into a bigger issue for someone else to fix down the line. I personally cannot support this suggestion due to these reasons. -1.

I have to give this a massive -1. Your job should be more focused on directing and leading the Army, not killing shit yourself. The MCMD job used to have every kit weapon in his kit, and there was too much focus on MCMD's being their own one-man-army and this seems like a step in a negative direction.

It's actually been 3 months friend, 06/07/2020 was the day they were banned!

The reason I disagreed your post is because it was factually incorrect. I was invited into the Discord in which this all happened in and took the screenshots myself after seeing the messages, there was no plotting against Ninjaman at all. However, I agree that Ninjaman should be allowed another chance in the community as he has acknowledged his wrongdoing and apologised.

I'm going to reply to this to give you some context here. If you kill someone in Mexico, then hop over the border to Texas, does that mean you can't be held to the fact you killed someone? If you make a post on Social Media telling your classmate to kill themselves and actively bully them, that it doesn't get held against you at school because it's in a different place? If people are actively plotting against someone or harassing them, it doesn't matter where it is, they will be removed from the community until they understand they were a part of something that was wrong and can look towards improvement.

Yeah and they lied. We have had this conversation a million times.

Honestly just looked through those pictures and see nothing that this guy did as overly wrong. I don't understand this report at all?