Father Michael

+1 What chop said

@ Carvis @Duck Im well aware that it isnt hard to just... not necro. However, why not just prevent the issue all together. Thats like me saying “Oh well I have a solution that ends all crime and this is how we can do it” and your response would be, “well just dont commit crimes”. Crimes will be committed, just like people will necropost again. If there is a way to stop it, then why not.

Name: Necroposting Prevention Suggestion: After a post has gone uncommented on for a certain amount of time, the topic automatically becomes locked. Or the topic must be approved before the rest of the community can see it. Why should we implement this? This will prevent Necroposting by not allowing new posts to be posted on old topics. How will this improve the Forums? This will prevent necroposting and reduce the amount of warning points given out on the server.

Takes a big man to say something like that. I gotta lotta respect for that shit.

+1 dont want to go into reasons why. Holiday stuff, lets give the kid a present tho

@ whoever changed the post I really don't know who did it and I hope they see this post. If they don't, then just move it I guess. Question: Why was the contraversial poll changed? (linked below) Further Attachements: Concerns: IMO this was an unprofessional move on who changed it. It makes the community look bad. Also, Im not a legal expert but it could fall into some troubles. Such as Libel or Slander. (Again I'm no legal expert I just too 7th grade civics). Also of this post is going to cause any problems, that's not the intent. I'm genuinely concerned for the person who changed the post, as well as any one who wants to learn on the recent events of what just occured. I wouldn't want them to receive any misinformation. Also, please only respond to this if it pertains to you as it is the rules of the ask the staff section. And finally, if this seems sarcastic or facetious in any way, it's not. It is a genuine concern of mine.

what he said -1

There are a few other CC spawns outside of the room besides the one listed above. One is next to the CIS antenna i believe there may be one in courtyard

Name of the staff member you're asking: (Please @ the staff member - Example @Sanchez Resident ) Question: Why was I banned from the teamspeak for 1 second Further attachments: "<14:27:49> You were banned for 1 second from the server by "[Sanchez] Sanchez Versock" (OK)" Concerns: I asked Sanchez twice and threatened to make an ask the staff. Regardless, he refrained from answering my question so I took em to the forums.

idk i think im gonna have to +1 this. Unfortunately this is a good idea and it would make a lot of sense

I have no intent to RP... -1

He didn't make any attempt to message a SR officer within the 104th whatsoever from what I understand or a member of the Wolfpack.

So what are you suggesting the rules be changed to? or better yet, what are you suggesting being changed? Do you just want an ambush to occur if the negotiator is taken hostage as well?

im fully aware lmao

I think most did