Mitchell

Look at one point I'd probably of 100% agreed with y'all and honestly these trainings would be dope for a much more serious server or hell an Arma server maybe. But this is garry's mod, and a very relaxed server. I've thought that ARC trainings are flawed and need revamping but this is going very overboard and I don't think fits within the archetype that the server is trynna fit into. -1

This isn't even a good meme -1

+1 My biggest complaint about anaxes is how restrictive it is for movement for those without jetpacks. Adding new pathways and ways to move would help break up the monotony of movement around the map.

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED

Your ban at this time has expired, as such this appeal will be denied due to you having already served out the ban length.

+1, its swapping out with Adi Gallia which I don't think has ever really been popular, nothing to really lose with this change.

I should of denied this when me and Fizzik were Directors smh

@JessicaP1224 While this isn't the correct place to put this, Ill leave it up for others to give feedback on this topic. As it currently stands, I believe that you are a bit confused on our rating scale, a 5/10 is an "average shoot-em up" or overall just an average event that doesn't have a whole lot to it besides just spawning in some droids for people to shoot with nothing special about it. You can rate it higher as a shoot-em up based off of any RP they might have, how well things were spawned and balanced, and many other things that can help contribute to the event quality. Same goes in the opposite direction too, if you think the spawning wasn't very good you can give it a lower rating. We use a standard shootem up as 5 because its meant to be the average standard event someone can do that doesn't involve RP really. As this is an RP server, for you to get a higher rating you should involve RP into the event along with the combat. This isn't really a flaw or an oversight, more of a built in way to encourage people to include some RP into their events. If you have any questions, feel free to direct them my way.

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

They don't get the full ARC kit, only the Westar. This was changed a while back when I was valiant the first time to help balance it out.

Literally all of our Alphas were on yesterday at one point or another... the only Alpha I don't see at least every day atm is Hades and Lerona. Who are both on LOA... This is probably a time zone difference Dennis, your work schedule probably makes you miss them.

He's suggesting to use the already existing models on server, we don't use the name tag anyways so its not a big deal.

Just to bring this up, Alpha is also smaller than the following subunits. Wolfpack Havoc Squad Torrent company. The rest are either equal or less, the thing is that outside of CG, the rest of them have 2 subunits resulting in more WL in total. So the only battalion with an actually equal number of Sub-Unit WL is CG Diplomatic Services. This is beyond us "Just wanting to be as special as Torrent Company." We want the extra slots that other subunits are granted. Anyways, +1 I green lit this.

I did, Anyways +1 the current model is ugly as shit.

Name: Mitchell RP Rank: BCMD Suggestion: Give the Rancor Heavy a PLX. Implementation: Currently our heavies only have a Z-6 and no real appeal for people to join the regiment. With only our HC and Nate getting rockets it would help us with getting some additional people into the regiment without adding too much. Lore: N/A Workshop content if applicable: (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: Add the PLX to the Rancor Heavy Trooper. (Any job modification requires all this information) Job: Rancor Heavy Trooper Slots: 10 Description: Keep the Same. Model: models/kylejwest/synergyroleplay/rancor/sr3drancorarcheavytrooper/sr3drancorarcheavytrooper.mdl (Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/player/synergy/cblake/ls_squad/ls_trp/lstrp.mdl (Get this from the Q menu) Weapons: rw_sw_plx1 (If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu)) Other:

This is literally what Sith did... They'd just say their civies, and you can't do anything to them, then they 2 hit you with a saber or shadow strike you if you where a sith assassin.

Im sorry but Sith just don't work on the server. They brought nothing but issues and don't fit into a server with clones that can kill them long before they reach them. Enough people bitch and moan about BH issues but Sith would literally only cause the same things if not more so. -1.

Name: Mitchell Suggestion: Allow VAs to move GM Applications. Why should we implement this? At the current moment, GMOs or GMMs have to contact an HA in order to get applications moved to pending. As GMM doesn't have a role on the forums the simplest way is to allow VAs to move them for us when we ask. How will this improve the Forums? Makes it so GM apps can be moved without needing to bother HAs.

He was told to put it here, as it is beyond something for BH to regulate, meant to edit my original post but have been in class all day.

Logic, while I do believe in that sentiment too. This is not the way to go about it. You improve things by holding people accountable for their shitty behavior. This doesn’t fix anything. also, if you’re going to go on about how we as a community need to be better or talk about things being offensive.

So, I’ve thought about this a bit more and I have more I’d like to add. This rule is unnecessary due to the fact that people who are offensive or racist in what have you in the ways they portray a religion will be punished. Your suggestion won’t stop anything, as people who want to do islamophobic shit or be general dumbasses will still do so. We don’t tell people that they can’t fly vehicles cause minges could take them, we don’t have players weapons stripped because people may RDM in between events. Etc. you get the picture. there is 0 issue with people role playing as characters with religious themes unless they take it to far which some people have. But just because some people are dumbasses doesn’t mean we should restrict player RP, especially when it pertains to BH which is more heavily roleplay oriented. If we applied this same reasoning to other fields then you can quickly see how this is a flawed perspective.

There really isn't any issue to people using real world religions unless they are doing it in a mocking or offensive way. Which is why people who have done that have been punished in the past. This suggestion is mostly targeting BH and EJs as well, Jedi have the force and clones aren't religious. Regardless, the idea that people can make caricatures of religions and that's fine but not being able to roleplay as someone of that faith normally isn't? I feel like that would end up offending more people if that's what you're concerned about. Also, to provide context to the situation that lead to this. My BH is based off of Joshua Graham from Fallout New Vegas, if yall haven't played the game essentially parts of his quotes are verses from bible passages. Literally, Logic's only complaint was that one of the verses I quoted said Jerusalem in it. If I hadn't of quoted that specific line, he wouldn't of gave 2 shits. Regardless, -1. We already have sufficient rules in place. EDIT: Was not aware he was told to put this on the forums instead by Sinister. Changed statement to reflect that.

-1, I thought this was off-topic at first. Seriously, this is a new level of dumb.

Hey Piff, a bit of clarification on why some of the rules are worded the way the are. Both rule 4 and 11 have to be broad and nonspecific so that it can be applied to instances of it. These are called “blanket rules” ex: disrespect is non specific cause there’s multiple forms of disrespect and by being too specific someone could weasel their way out of a punishment. Or with the don’t sit on anything that couldn’t support your weight, no director or HA wants to get an up to date tab on every single prop that clones can’t sit on because it’s a large amount of effort for something that ultimately doesn’t improve things. the issue with most of our rules isn’t the rules themselves but rather that the player base has to decide to enforce them through AOS. this is gonna be a -1 from me, the rules you listed are fine as is.