Mitchell

I don't want to standardize internal structures because I believe having unique qualities about the inner working of each battalion lends them to have something different to offer players besides just different models or lore characters to go for. I believe you are talking about my effectient intel team section and possibly the fair promotion requirement statement as well. I don't have plans to standardize them but as long as these systems function properly then I won't try to force change where it doesn't need to happen. If something isn't causing issues changing it for the sake of change usually just causes more issues in my experience. Hope this clarifies that for ya, if you got any questions feel free to shoot them my way.

So I won’t be going into detail as this is a very private issue for me and was correlated to several things happening irl which tanked my mental state. I sought help, and I’m doing significantly better. It’s a process, so there are ups and downs but I’m much more stable and confident in my ability to continue to provide to the community I appreciate your concern, wish more people cared about this stuff.

This format is gross. Please fix it so its more readable. thanks

To clarify; I do plan on making sure I’m still an active presence within the community and making sure that I’m holding myself to the same standards as I would everyone below me. I’d be very public in the sense that I’d be as transparent as possible whenever asked so people can more accurate judge the direction the GAR is taking and give me feedback. As ultimately my job is to make sure people are able to enjoy their time in the GAR and having that transparency allows for people to bring up discussion with me so we can come out with solutions that benefits everyone also, I appreciate your criticism of the ways I host meetings. I genuinely don’t like hosting meetings too often and that can sometimes pour out. I’m already trying to remedy that to the best of my ability.

So the little contact in 41st was mostly cause I was keeping an eye on cloud. I didn’t much have a reason to talk in their discord cause the biggest issue they had was PR. And that came mostly from cloud being mingy at times. Of course there are other issues but that stuff should be handled internally and I shouldn’t need to get involved with the daily running’s of the battalion. I believe if we had a chance to sit down and talk I could convince you to change your vote if you have time

So, few things. I "resigned" because of IRL situations that caused me to be in an emotional state in which I was not thinking clearly. I took the LOA after speaking with Gears so I could address those issues and get back to the server because I like doing my job here. "Not doing enough" wasn't the reason I was removed from GMD. I literally wrote the list of stuff they gave me further up in the thread. A lackluster RCMD term in which I had 0 interactions with your battalion nor had any reason to interact with you. So idk how you can judge my term except for me being "AFK for the majority of it" As for why I am running? you can read my application. What could I possibly bring to the table at this point? You could read my application and find out. If you want to sit down and have a more in depth discussion as to why I am running I am more than willing to do so, but I suggest you read the application first so you can ask me questions related to the goals I laid out.

Congratulations! You have been ACCEPTED into the CWRP staff team! // LOCKED // MOVED TO STAFF APPLICATIONS - ACCEPTED

This is because Rancor is self sustaining. The only thing I need them to do is run the ARC program and maintain activity. I gave Stix a lot of breathing room as long as his HC kept me updated on certain thing within the battalion. Mostly concerning numbers. The only thing I had to step in on recently WAS some GM issues which turned out to be a non factor. However, I did have to reach out to them towards the beginning of my term due to them having conflicts with CG. In which I told them that they need to stop. Other than that, I haven't needed to step in as Stix did his job pretty well. As for 41st, my main observations was to oversee Cloud and make sure Shpack was ready to take over. Along with trying to improve their PR by keeping their rolemodels in check within the battalion. They handled things internally without me having to get involved 99% of the time. My input in every HC decision / discussion has been from a holistic perspective. Because I have been up the ranks in staff, Jedi, and clone. I have a lot of stuff I get my views and ideas from. I don't give input from the perspective of GMD or HA unless the topic is related to that issue. I give input from MY perspective. I don't need to speak with you to run for the position, mostly because I never found a good opportunity to go over things with you plus it slipped my mind as I already talked with the majority of BCMDs. Its a courtesy call not a requirement. As well, I'm not gonna be going into depth with my plans on this post as ultimately they could easily cause issues. And I don't need to go over my plans with anyone outside of Bro and the directors in my interviews.

Hey Panda, so this is so long ago I don’t remember exact details but it mostly revolves around inactivity and some poor choice of words during my kal denial. if you wanna talk about it I can give you a run down in TS

So this is probably going to be a question a lot of people will have so I’m gonna lay out what facts I can without getting my opinion on the situation involved because you guys can make up your mind about the situation. It mostly came down to my month long hiatus from the server due to extremely personal reasons. I had a communication breakdown between myself and my team and had some internal issues spill out into a more public space. 2 weeks ago I had a dm from crimson asking me to increase my presence, communication, and to make sure our weekend deployment announcements came out earlier. I delivered on his requests and improved those areas. I was starting to get back into things with myself moving back into my dorm and things finally settling down irl when I had my removal conversation with Woeny and Sock Saturday night. they felt like at this point with changes coming to the staff team they wanted someone else to run the program, because we had differences in how I wanted to run the program as GMD and the style of which I did so. They wanted more of a figure head instead of an administrator. there were a few specific issues they had, mainly dealing with the way in which I handled a situation involving someone in an assistant role overstepping their bounds. However, after discussing it with woeny he understood why I did what I did and agreed what I did was a more appropriate response. I can’t go into detail as it would just cause drama. If you have any more questions or want to talk about this in TS I can go more in depth. I want to try my best to portray these events as objectively as possible. ultimately, the issues I had that lead to my removal were related to real life personal issues that are now behind me, and I am confident that if I had been given more time their issues or grievances would of been solved, however they decided to go with a different solution.

Steam Name: Mitchell | Synr.gg RP Name: Mitchell RP Rank: 2LT Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:59607690 Brigade you are applying for: MCMD Experience: 104th: CMD, REGL, ARCL. 327th: XO. Rancor: BCMD, Valiant 2x. Null: Ordo, Mereel 2x. Recon RCMD. Senior Jedi General, 2x Sentinel Gatekeeper (XO of branch) Guild Marshal. GMD 2x. HA 2x. Director of Staff. Why should you become a Marshal Commander?: I have been in various command positions throughout my 3+ years within this community, in all branches of this server, except for naval, I have been involved with its leadership or administration in some capacity. I have seen, done, and experienced everything this server has to offer and I've seen what works and what doesn’t. I bring this vast experience and the lessons it has taught me to this position. I have, over the years, learned the best ways in order to approach situations from a non-biased perspective and how to get the best out of people. I am able to be the firm guiding hand that isn’t afraid to step in when necessary, however, I am able to take a step back to let people make their own decisions and run their battalions the way they want to. I believe that my approach is the best way for BCMDs to be able to do their jobs and enjoy their experience within the server, by letting them run their battalions the way they want to. I know how to most efficiently communicate and work together with the rest of high command to enforce our standards and expectations for everyone within the G.A.R. I’m able to listen to others opinions and advice, will still standing my ground when I believe it is the best course of action. While I do sometimes get too heated in some arguments, I try my best to listen to the other side and discuss thing so we can make a solution that fixes our problems. Finally, I believe that I am someone who is able to give good and honest advice when people ask so that they can improve. It may rub people the wrong way, however, I try my best to make sure the I give them stuff to improve on and how to improve it when time comes. Do you understand the lore of the Grand Army?: Yes Availability: My activity will fluctuate week to week based off of tests, practice, and other things. Usually I am available most days around 3-6 but I could be on anytime from 3-11 just depending on my class schedule that day. Give a brief overview of your achievements on the server: 104th: I became REGL and CMD underneath Spartan, where I assisted Scarecrow with WP and helping reform it along with trying to restore our depleted regiment numbers. Rancor: 2X Valiant, I’ve rewritten and reworked Alpha designation trials numerous times, along with having fairly active squads and assisting the BCMDs with the ARC program. BCMD Blitz: during my time as Blitz I reverted alot of changes made to the ARC program, and entitled a data based approach to our arc trainings, where we want to hover around a certain % of people passing and failing each training. As XO I along with Xiao made several systems which helped improve activity and organization within the battalion. Overall, rancor went from being myself and 2 officers to a very healthy state and a full High command by the end of my term. 327th: As 327th XO I tried my best to combat the toxic legacy that was dragging the battalion down, alongside Willy we had managed to get 327th into a much more stable state and had started to fill our regiment leads, however we were removed before we could truly start to thrive. Null: Helped run the squad during my stint as Ordo, and assisted both Prince and Omalic with running tryouts and other things around the squad my second time in Null. Jedi: Not much to really go over here. Staff: I was Director of staff for about a month and a half, didn’t do as well as I could have due to alot of circumstances but overall it gave me alot of insight into how things work and was a valuable teaching experience. GMD: Where I really first learned how to manage people and where I was managing my diverse cast of leadership and team members in order to efficiently run the program. Recon RCMD: Oversaw Stix’s term as BCMD and Clouds 2nd term into Shpacks first. Both battalions are doing very well with small issues that I have given advice on how to address for both of them. Do you have a microphone?: Yes Where do you want the Grand Army to be at the end of your term?: Ultimately, I want the G.A.R. to be in a position where all of our battalions are doing well and able to sustain an active player base throughout the day and that they are a fun environment to be in. While that is a very general statement, more specifics I want from each battalion are. An active Officer and NCO core. Fair and reasonable promotion requirements or merit systems (if they have them at all) Promotion of roleplay by its officers and members. Maintaining an effective and efficient intel team or intel system within their battalion. Each of these goals will be achieved with different methods for each battalion, as I firmly believe that the BCMDs should be the ones running the battalion and as long as they are doing their jobs and creating a fun environment, then I will be happy to leave them alone. Of course, specific issues that arise with each battalion will be handled as necessary by myself or other members of my high command. How do you plan to improve relations within the Grand Army?: So, I have a few different ways I will be trying to improve relations within the GAR and server as a whole. For each decision I make, I will be as open and transparent about it as possible: Those of you that know me know that I am open about the decisions I make and are willing to talk about 99% of everything I do. The only time I won’t reveal things is if there are personal issues or private information involved in the situation or those above me restrict my ability to speak on the topic. I’ve seen a lot of mistrust and or criticism directed towards this high command due to the lack of transparency, and I believe that first by being open with people I can gain their trust and we can improve our high command and from there begin to work on battalion relations between themselves. Promotion of more teamwork/communication and roleplay during the regimental deployments: Our regimental deployments on the weekends are a great place to start having my regimentals get their regiments together in order to get them to work together in a fun environment. This is one of our easiest ways to help improve battalion relations in conjunction with already existing systems within the server. Efficient use of our regimentals: My regimentals will generally have better relations and a better understanding of the battalions they are overseeing than I will. I’d be communicating with them in order to get a clear picture of the battalions and make a plan in order to address the issues that might prop up in them. From my experience people dislike it when high command steps in to tell them what to do, in order to make it as less painful of a process I’d like for my regimentals to handle those situations unless its an emergency or something I need to handle personally. Dealing with drama or situations in a fair and transparent way: Issues and drama are bound to appear on this server no matter how well things are run. In order to reduce the affects of it, I will be having my regimentals submit bi-weekly reports on their battalions including numbers, player retention, and any drama or other issues that have popped up. If drama occurs, I will be directing my regimentals to mediate in order to resolve the issue between the two parties if it is between 2 battalions in the same regiment or both regimentals if it is between 2 battalions in different regiments. Inner battalion drama I’ll have my regimentals handle and report on how they are progressing. Ultimately, the quicker we address these issues the less time it has to fester and create more drama or further issues. Finally, My ultimate plan in order to help improve relations is to promote the top priority of each battalion having a fun environment to be in. By doing this, people are more likely to join battalions, work with other battalions, and stay longer in these battalions. This will boost the battalion’s PR which in turn will make more people want to work with them and the process builds upon itself. There is more, but these are just my general tenets. If you have any questions shoot them my way. Do you understand that if you go inactive that you will be removed from your position?: Yes Do you understand that your position has a three month term limit and you must reapply after three months to maintain your Marshal commander rank?: Yes

Name: Mitchell Who helped (If applicable): Jabaku Event/Encounter Name: Thats alot of Commmando Droids Link to Event/Encounter Document (optional): Description of event/encounter (required if no document provided): 104th and Rancor were sent to clear out a city filled with CIS forces, after doing so they unleashed a bio weapon which turned all of the cities residents into zombies. Causing them to need to fight their way out of the city and be extracted.

RIP your hearing Merrill

Name: Mitchell Who helped (If applicable): N/A Event/Encounter Name: Temporal Anomaly Link to Event/Encounter Document (optional): Description of event/encounter (required if no document provided): Recon was sent to look into why a republic research facility went dark. Upon investigating they found the facility had been the victim of a temporal anomaly. As the situation deteriorated, the remaining survivors decided to detonate the nuke in order to destroy the facility.

Congratulations! You have been ACCEPTED into the CWRP staff team! // LOCKED // MOVED TO STAFF APPLICATIONS - ACCEPTED

@JessicaP1224 While this isn't the correct place to put this, Ill leave it up for others to give feedback on this topic. As it currently stands, I believe that you are a bit confused on our rating scale, a 5/10 is an "average shoot-em up" or overall just an average event that doesn't have a whole lot to it besides just spawning in some droids for people to shoot with nothing special about it. You can rate it higher as a shoot-em up based off of any RP they might have, how well things were spawned and balanced, and many other things that can help contribute to the event quality. Same goes in the opposite direction too, if you think the spawning wasn't very good you can give it a lower rating. We use a standard shootem up as 5 because its meant to be the average standard event someone can do that doesn't involve RP really. As this is an RP server, for you to get a higher rating you should involve RP into the event along with the combat. This isn't really a flaw or an oversight, more of a built in way to encourage people to include some RP into their events. If you have any questions, feel free to direct them my way.

See ya dude

Your LOA has been logged as COMPLETED. If this is an error and you require more time, please contact a Head Admin or a Director immediately. // LOCKED // MOVED TO LOA - COMPLETED LOA'S

You're fine man, welcome back.

Unfortunately your application has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or a Head Admin. You may re-apply for a staff position after 30 DAYS from this post. // LOCKED // MOVED TO STAFF APPLICATIONS - DENIED

@XuenIs your LOA over?

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED

Im off LOA now.

@ConradWhat genre you looking for? ik you said Action adventure but thats a bit broad. You got any specifics?