Jump to content

Tec

Member
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Tec

  1. Ugh +1 But for your sake (and everyone else's) LEAVE AGAIN ALREADY BACTA Love you!
  2. -1 also where was my CoE consultation on this lol
  3. +1 doesnt need to be a HUGE buff, just a little qol please <3 Mystic said it best as always
  4. 5/5/5 Many laughs were had not only in our battalions but also with y'all on the GM front. The deployment itself was a super good concept that y'all executed super well, even when @Ollie_ fucked it up. Appreciate the deployment as always. thanks a ton <3
  5. Name: Tec Staff Rank: Admin Length of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): 11/22/2023 - 11/27/2023 Reason: Holidays! Will be away. Do you understand that if you go on LOA/ROA while holding a leadership position, a named character position, or a position with limited slots you may lose your position?: Yes Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your staff/leadership position?: Yes
  6. actually best take as always +1
  7. some how never +1'd this. Can we keep a few mando models though <3
  8. +1 can we give her her red saber though? Also, Adi Gallia for Saesee Tiin was for sure the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals.
  9. ill take this bug pls, i miss this chatbox.
  10. Kinda neutral here, maybe if he becomes a better Arligan I can +1
  11. Honestly, Bane has it right imo. HVO has proven to be a bit of a fail, it's underutilized, has limited slots, and is just taking up a job per battalion. Give the launchers to ARF (which high key needs a buff anyway) and call it a day. As for the mines, they've been causing more problems than they've really been worth. I'd remove them from most of the kits, maybe leave them to the "lore HVO" classes like Nate and A'den and such? or y'know, split SUP back into ENG/Pilot and give the Engineers Anti-Vehicle mines, but that's a story for another suggestion. Maybe people will start taking ARF a little more seriously and they'll actually get some love. +1
  12. Tec

    Venaliator?

    5/5/5 we appreciate you!
  13. Honestly +1, I think the addition of guild lore characters, especially relatively minor ones could be good for passive RP. Let them have a little more lax of rules on what they can do against the republic and then let some people be guild mains and have fun lol. Yeah theres the issue with maybe some of them like Bane being used for events, but if thats the case then A. don't add ones like Bane who are frequently used (I would argue Bossk for example isn't) and the B. just use them anyways even for events still, who really cares if they're a lore job. or honestly just add Boba/Bossk and that little squad and run them tryouts and such with a little leader.
  14. All is good my man! Hope you're well?! Doing pretty solid! Glad you're doing awesome things. Jump into TS sometime when you're not busy for us!
  15. Miss you Freck! Hope all is well <3
  16. +1 katy likes funny cats +1 katy likes funny cats
  17. -1 dont do it to yourself
  18. This is just another reason we need the old Clone Armored Knight model back Also, did you get Jedi Perms for this suggestion? @Mystic
  19. Tec

    Forums Badges

    +1 im a forums goblin in training
×
×
  • Create New...