To add on to this, it’s similar to 41st having ARF as the base trooper. Since ARF is the base trooper for 41st, we don’t get a 41st trooper, ARF is seen as a stepping stone 90% of the time for the enlisted. It’s no different than any battalions base WL and how it’s treated. I’m assuming in TU it’s seen the same way, it’s a WL that can be used as a stepping stone. It’s not a bad thing to have for enlisted in base parts of a battalion, mind you, but if all a subunit gets is to be a stepping stone, why should it exist. It’s mind boggling anybody is against this suggestion or the TU one. I think these are well thought out changes that the majority of a battalion want, so +1 from me. Obviously if TU gets swapped out this suggestion might very well change, but a battalion not having equal options to other battalions for base troopers is goofy.