Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/05/2019 in all areas

  1. What is up with these suggestions forcing people to do things? Neutral
    4 points
  2. """""""""""""""""""""""""""HD"""""""""""""""""""""""""""
    3 points
  3. As this suggestion currently stands it wouldn't get my support as it completely fucks GMs combat perk. What I would suggest is a hybrid idea. ENGs of all battalions (That have ENG) can drop armor (potentially) All GMs can drop armor but only support trooper has armor kit (Or restrict it so only support can do both) This way the functionality is added to all battalions (ENG: 212th, 327th, DU, etc (not handed out like candy but helps ENG thrive more?)) but GM still get to keep an upgraded armor boost of some sort to keep it as their specialty? Thoughts?
    3 points
  4. Lets keep this to feedback. I talked to both Husky and Fizzik, opinions won’t change on the matter so let community feedback be the decision maker also a firm reminder that dumbing all my posts because i have a differing opinion is child like and toxic @Kronos Jones
    2 points
  5. Just putting it out there “BaseOps tryouts AOS on entry” or a ton of props blocking the doirs. Just putting it out there, thats not what optional DBs are like
    2 points
  6. I was not demoted. I was suspended. And my suspention had nothing to do with the DB claim, it was from my actions. -1 to this suggestion
    2 points
  7. Why can’t you guys just accept that this causes fucking issues, like seriously, someone got demoted in staff because you think you are better than everyone and don’t need a dupe
    2 points
  8. -1 The new color is much more immersive and true to form.
    2 points
  9. RP Name/Steam Name: PVT Chodeathan/ Castiel (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198122544437/) Steam ID: STEAM_1:1:81139354 Date of Ban: 3/5/2019 Length of Ban: 6 hours Offense: ERP Banned By: I forgot ): Why should we unban you/shorten the ban period?: So i was in a small squad and out of nowhere we got ambushed by a sniper and one of our men died. Luckily he was revived but was really scared so i sat next to him and said this in order - *Kisses neck* You look really cute today (: . How you feelin? then i got in trouble by an admin but i know I was doing something right becuase the dudes i kissed was blushing, so i whispered in game chat- *Kisses neck again (:" Evidence to support your claims: Nothing but the other dude was feeling better after so i think i was doing fine.
    1 point
  10. Name: Logic | Gree Suggestion: Make Debrief Unclaimable Implementation: So bascially, just tell the people claiming debrief to make a dupe, because it makes no difference whether you practice on the real thing or on a dupe that looks similar Lore: N/A Okay so before you all dumb me and shit, lets point out that this has led to staff abuse and arrests in the past, and is causing issues. I have mentioned this to Husly and got immediately shut down by him saying "They need to practice on the real thing" so I believe community feedback is a better way to show that this does indeed cause issues and a dupe needs to be made (I'll even make it for him)
    1 point
  11. After discussing the issue between the three of us we have come to a decision regarding this suggestion. The positives. 1. Reduces server lag by not adding more props (People have placed DB dupes before not just for tryouts (Courtyard for outdoor DB) and get harassed for wasting the already underutilized DB room) 2. Freeing SAs to run sims and tryouts that absolutely require dupes. 3. Allowing BO to host their tryouts like a normal battalion without having to chase a staff around to host tryouts. The potential negatives. 1. DB might be needed for optional promo or event thing (Which point BO is smart enough to leave) Yeah, that's the only one we could see. That being said this is what the official ruling will be: BO can use the DB for tryouts. DB can be used for valid RP purposes. ie: holding a briefing regarding a mission/tournament/RP announcement. If anyone tries to circumvent this ruling or exploit it they will be punished accordingly. This suggestion has been DENIED //Locked// //Move to Denied//
    1 point
  12. +1 if we can get models made, these are made outta clay
    1 point
  13. I'm gonna +1, but I won't like it for the sole reason of the models being equivalent to bad batches right now
    1 point
  14. Lmao I hate how skinny it’s arms are but 104th has been wanting EVO models for a long ass time. +1
    1 point
  15. -1 just don’t be a garbage fucking shot
    1 point
  16. Can you imagine walking down a hallway full of high quality models custom made and then turning the corner to see this motherfucker? I sure can.
    1 point
  17. They seem to believe they can
    1 point
  18. It was carvis, but i was incorrect, it was a suspension, the fact remains that that wouldn’t have happened if they used a dupe
    1 point
  19. This is not a conducive line of discussion. This sort of change should be brought to me directly if it continued to be an issue in your mind. I shut it down once before because we had a discussion on it, and the discussion ended. I do not appreciate this line of action, however, I'm fine with letting this remain up to hear community feedback as I am flexible, however, understand that this is incredibly rude, and does undermine my authority as the Base Commander. In the future, if you wish a change to be made, and have previously been shot down before, you could bring it up to me again, or multiple other avenues of questioning. This is practically a public callout at this point, and can almost be considered baiting drama. That being said. I am open ears to "remove claiming of DB", however, as stated earlier, the debrief is essentially the "property" of the base operations, we utilize it for our tryouts, if another battalion needs it they can either request, or simply wait, as the time we spend in debrief during our tryouts is nominal at worst. Most of our members are not SA+, and limiting us to a dupe also creates a scenario where we can only do tryouts when a SA+ is on. It is my belief that this topic is entirely unnecessary, and the fact that anyone has an issue with the Base Operations utilizing debrief for 10-15 minutes, while it is not under use 99% of the day is absolutely ludicrous. I will NOT be utilizing this thread to defend my side, or even reply to any posts concerning this issue, as it is not something that should be posted on the forums at length. If someone has an issue with it, they can discuss it with me directly. Please relegate your response to giving your intended feedback, not beginning any sort of argument. This applies to both +1 and -1. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me on discord or teamspeak, or message me directly on the forums. -1.
    1 point
  20. They shut down DB again right before I posted this, so they refuse to use it still
    1 point
  21. -1 and here is why As of right now the players already shred through the current NPCs which causes Game Masters/Helpers to spawn more to try to push the players back as they always rush forward because they simply do not care if they die. If anything we should lower the health and/or armor of the players rather than the NPCs. Also people already complain about the lag how it is, and what you are proposing would cause even more lag which will result in even more complaints. Overall this would not work out because of lag and how people play the game.
    1 point
  22. -1 this would just cause more lag and the server to crash more. Also clones were also 1-2 hits as well and we aren’t doing that. It’s hard for droids to react while killing them with 700 health with 100-250 health they would be so easy to kill. Unless you spawn a absurd amount that would lag the server
    1 point
  23. dont tell him that! also +1 THICC
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...