[Denied] Canarys ban

[Canary]

Name: Canary
Steam ID:STEAM_0:1:453773998
Ban Reason:  Threatening to delete docs?
Date of Ban: 11/08/2025
Length of Ban: Perma/ Community
Staff Member(s) Involved: Clorox
Reason(s) why we should accept your appeal:  Quite honestly while I do believe that my ban was unfounded I understand that due to the severity of document deletion I understand why I was banned. I do just want to explain at least from my side of things. In a private discord I made a joke regarding deleting documents because I was told about something that happened in synergy in regards to CG which had me annoyed to say the least. As a result I joked about still having the fox email as well as going to delete docs. After I made that joke I cooled down and moved on with my day deleting nothing.  Fast forwarding roughly a week, in that same discord server politics got brought up which in turn caused an argument that I was a part of. As a result of that argument I ended up lashing out the promptly leaving. The day after this argument happened I get told by Clorox that they had received a screenshot of me threatening to delete documents and that as a result I was community banned. The timeline of events leads me to believe that I was targeted due to behavior in that private discord.  All of this culminates into me believing that the ban was unfounded and targeted. Do I believe my ban will get appealed? Probably not. But I did just want to set things straight. While I agree that I didn't play nice with others so to speak and I did have my rough edges. During my time actively playing I did do incredible work in whatever battalion I was a part of. And up until I started dealing with others harassing me leading my to disassociate with Synergy I genuinely did love not just the community but also playing the game. If you ask anyone that ever truly played with me they can tell you that I was always passionate and caring towards Synergy.  Also in previous cases where the person actually ended up deleting documents the accused was allowed to rejoin the community. I never actually deleted any documents.
Evidence to support your claims:
This was the joke that was made in a non synergy related discord

This is when Clorox first reached out to me.

Edited December 29, 2025 by Canary
Thought of more to say

[Canary 51]

Name: Canary
Steam ID:STEAM_0:1:453773998
Ban Reason:  Threatening to delete docs?
Date of Ban: 11/08/2025
Length of Ban: Perma/ Community
Staff Member(s) Involved: Clorox
Reason(s) why we should accept your appeal:  Quite honestly while I do believe that my ban was unfounded I understand that due to the severity of document deletion I understand why I was banned. I do just want to explain at least from my side of things. In a private discord I made a joke regarding deleting documents because I was told about something that happened in synergy in regards to CG which had me annoyed to say the least. As a result I joked about still having the fox email as well as going to delete docs. After I made that joke I cooled down and moved on with my day deleting nothing.  Fast forwarding roughly a week, in that same discord server politics got brought up which in turn caused an argument that I was a part of. As a result of that argument I ended up lashing out the promptly leaving. The day after this argument happened I get told by Clorox that they had received a screenshot of me threatening to delete documents and that as a result I was community banned. The timeline of events leads me to believe that I was targeted due to behavior in that private discord.  All of this culminates into me believing that the ban was unfounded and targeted. Do I believe my ban will get appealed? Probably not. But I did just want to set things straight. While I agree that I didn't play nice with others so to speak and I did have my rough edges. During my time actively playing I did do incredible work in whatever battalion I was a part of. And up until I started dealing with others harassing me leading my to disassociate with Synergy I genuinely did love not just the community but also playing the game. If you ask anyone that ever truly played with me they can tell you that I was always passionate and caring towards Synergy.  Also in previous cases where the person actually ended up deleting documents the accused was allowed to rejoin the community. I never actually deleted any documents.
Evidence to support your claims:
This was the joke that was made in a non synergy related discord

This is when Clorox first reached out to me.

Edited December 29, 2025 by Canary
Thought of more to say

[Tide]

In all honesty I don't think the community needs someone like this; he is a constant drama machine and shit stirer. -1 keep him locked up

[Tide 20]

In all honesty I don't think the community needs someone like this; he is a constant drama machine and shit stirer. -1 keep him locked up

[TheMrNate]

In all honesty every time I heard your name brought up it was due to drama. -1 keep him locked up.

[TheMrNate 0]

In all honesty every time I heard your name brought up it was due to drama. -1 keep him locked up.

[KaiserNeiner]

This was clearly a joke but you actively harassed me when you could for existing, I dont really wanna see you on the server again. -1

Dumb reason for a ban tho. 

[KaiserNeiner 0]

This was clearly a joke but you actively harassed me when you could for existing, I dont really wanna see you on the server again. -1

Dumb reason for a ban tho. 

[Gizm0]

I think this ban was dumb

[Gizm0 51]

I think this ban was dumb

[Berries]

There have been worse people who were unbanned, and worse people who continue to play on the server +1

[Berries 8]

There have been worse people who were unbanned, and worse people who continue to play on the server +1

[Canary]

15 minutes ago, KaiserNeiner said:

This was clearly a joke but you actively harassed me when you could for existing, I dont really wanna see you on the server again. -1

Dumb reason for a ban tho. 

I will say. whether it helps or not. I never meant it in any seriously negative way, it was always just jokes, at least to me. If it came off serious and it did affect you then I am sorry

[Canary 51]

15 minutes ago, KaiserNeiner said:

This was clearly a joke but you actively harassed me when you could for existing, I dont really wanna see you on the server again. -1

Dumb reason for a ban tho. 

I will say. whether it helps or not. I never meant it in any seriously negative way, it was always just jokes, at least to me. If it came off serious and it did affect you then I am sorry

[KaiserNeiner]

1 minute ago, Canary said:

I will say. whether it helps or not. I never meant it in any seriously negative way, it was always just jokes, at least to me. If it came off serious and it did affect you then I am sorry

yeah man you and a few others dogpiled one me constantly saying you hope i kms and posting pictures of me i dont see how you cant see it as serious or not affecting me

[KaiserNeiner 0]

1 minute ago, Canary said:

I will say. whether it helps or not. I never meant it in any seriously negative way, it was always just jokes, at least to me. If it came off serious and it did affect you then I am sorry

yeah man you and a few others dogpiled one me constantly saying you hope i kms and posting pictures of me i dont see how you cant see it as serious or not affecting me

[DirtyDanLIT]

Ngl tbf I think that we gotta consider the fact that the individuals within this screenshot seemingly egged on the "Joke" need to be somewhat held accountable, considering that this is basically the same as egging on a CT to RDM. Whether or not it was said in jest the way Clorox portrayed his ban reasoning the other members should kinda be held accountable. 

[DirtyDanLIT 553]

Ngl tbf I think that we gotta consider the fact that the individuals within this screenshot seemingly egged on the "Joke" need to be somewhat held accountable, considering that this is basically the same as egging on a CT to RDM. Whether or not it was said in jest the way Clorox portrayed his ban reasoning the other members should kinda be held accountable. 

[Hitachi]

Umm ya I lowk liked canary when he was a fox even though he is a dick ig +1 but canary f u 

[Hitachi 69]

Umm ya I lowk liked canary when he was a fox even though he is a dick ig +1 but canary f u 

[Funnyman]

Let us keep in mind that Midnight was unbanned after actually deleting docs, but then again their ban was a long time ago. I think this ban needs to sit for a while before we undo it. for now -1

[Funnyman 203]

Let us keep in mind that Midnight was unbanned after actually deleting docs, but then again their ban was a long time ago. I think this ban needs to sit for a while before we undo it. for now -1

[Canary]

Just now, Funnyman said:

Let us keep in mind that Midnight was unbanned after actually deleting docs, but then again their ban was a long time ago. I think this ban needs to sit for a while before we undo it. for now -1

Do you not agree that the circumstances are wildly different? Midnight actually maliciously deleted documents. I never actually ended up deleting documents nor did I even have fox-email at the time I was merely expressing my frustrations in a private discord server.

[Canary 51]

Just now, Funnyman said:

Let us keep in mind that Midnight was unbanned after actually deleting docs, but then again their ban was a long time ago. I think this ban needs to sit for a while before we undo it. for now -1

Do you not agree that the circumstances are wildly different? Midnight actually maliciously deleted documents. I never actually ended up deleting documents nor did I even have fox-email at the time I was merely expressing my frustrations in a private discord server.

[Upset Saint]

What this man has done for CG in his run as Fox and as Hound should prove that he knows his work, yes joking about stuff like this should be avoided but it's also the fault of the ppl who were next in the position or ppl who are working on the battalion to keep check of who has access to documents for future references. It was a bad day for him and made a joke, I understand the punishment but still. +1 from me

[Upset Saint 91]

What this man has done for CG in his run as Fox and as Hound should prove that he knows his work, yes joking about stuff like this should be avoided but it's also the fault of the ppl who were next in the position or ppl who are working on the battalion to keep check of who has access to documents for future references. It was a bad day for him and made a joke, I understand the punishment but still. +1 from me

[Finn]

-1  

Not a fan of your behavior after you left, and we only have your word it was a joke, which is what everyone says when they get caught. I think it's been too soon to consider an unban, especially since you don't seem too apologetic about the situation.

[Finn 730]

-1  

Not a fan of your behavior after you left, and we only have your word it was a joke, which is what everyone says when they get caught. I think it's been too soon to consider an unban, especially since you don't seem too apologetic about the situation.

[Canary]

10 minutes ago, Finn said:

-1  

Not a fan of your behavior after you left, and we only have your word it was a joke, which is what everyone says when they get caught. I think it's been too soon to consider an unban, especially since you don't seem too apologetic about the situation.

Considering the time difference behind my quote, and the date of my ban. As well as me not actually having fox-mail it is easy to tell that it was in fact a joke. especially considering after I said it I immediately moved onto talking about work. It was something that I said in vain without thinking that I instantly moved on from. I won't say I'm exactly apologetic, I will say however that it was stupid  and it shouldn't have been done I admit that. Again while I don't believe I should have been banned I agree with the decision making in regards to the severity of the offense whether or not the offense had actually been committed. I'll also add on, by the time of my ban I hadn't actually played the server for roughly two months at that point. 

Edited December 29, 2025 by Canary

[Canary 51]

10 minutes ago, Finn said:

-1  

Not a fan of your behavior after you left, and we only have your word it was a joke, which is what everyone says when they get caught. I think it's been too soon to consider an unban, especially since you don't seem too apologetic about the situation.

Considering the time difference behind my quote, and the date of my ban. As well as me not actually having fox-mail it is easy to tell that it was in fact a joke. especially considering after I said it I immediately moved onto talking about work. It was something that I said in vain without thinking that I instantly moved on from. I won't say I'm exactly apologetic, I will say however that it was stupid  and it shouldn't have been done I admit that. Again while I don't believe I should have been banned I agree with the decision making in regards to the severity of the offense whether or not the offense had actually been committed. I'll also add on, by the time of my ban I hadn't actually played the server for roughly two months at that point. 

Edited December 29, 2025 by Canary

[Srama]

Honestly, the Ban reason was dumb, and people who stole documents for other servers, not saying names, were not banned. +1 

[Srama 41]

Honestly, the Ban reason was dumb, and people who stole documents for other servers, not saying names, were not banned. +1 

[Charles]

+1 Sure

[Charles 178]

+1 Sure

[Jhonnyblaze24]

I love this guy , real talk who hasn’t been seen as a bad apple after a bunch of dumb stuff has been done.  I think he’s crazy for wanting to comeback but +1 

[Jhonnyblaze24 51]

I love this guy , real talk who hasn’t been seen as a bad apple after a bunch of dumb stuff has been done.  I think he’s crazy for wanting to comeback but +1 

[Kirito]

-1 Too soon for an unban

[Kirito 12]

-1 Too soon for an unban

[Rippa]

The real question is why is Canary Still banned when we have let others be unbanned and back onto the server after actually deleting docs to me it just seems like people are Bias and picking and choosing which is not the synergy way So I feel like its only right to let canary have another chance when the HICOM team has let people be unbanned for far worse I see no reason to Not +1 he simply made a joke in a discord that isnt even related to synergy. So whoever handles this ban appeal I hope your not choosing favorites or Biasing cause that just ruins the game for everyone, you playing them you playing yourself but I see through you Big Synergy LLC ! +1 for the Unban

[Rippa 78]

The real question is why is Canary Still banned when we have let others be unbanned and back onto the server after actually deleting docs to me it just seems like people are Bias and picking and choosing which is not the synergy way So I feel like its only right to let canary have another chance when the HICOM team has let people be unbanned for far worse I see no reason to Not +1 he simply made a joke in a discord that isnt even related to synergy. So whoever handles this ban appeal I hope your not choosing favorites or Biasing cause that just ruins the game for everyone, you playing them you playing yourself but I see through you Big Synergy LLC ! +1 for the Unban

[I-am-Iconic]

+1, they let me go when I only attempted the murder, would have been jail for life if I won the fight, free the attempted and the threateners 

[I-am-Iconic 16]

+1, they let me go when I only attempted the murder, would have been jail for life if I won the fight, free the attempted and the threateners 

[KillJoy]

+1 everyone makes mistakes

[KillJoy 566]

+1 everyone makes mistakes

[Soccer]

1 hour ago, Tide said:

In all honesty I don't think the community needs someone like this; he is a constant drama machine and shit stirrer. -1 keep him locked up

i agree -1

[Soccer 48]

1 hour ago, Tide said:

In all honesty I don't think the community needs someone like this; he is a constant drama machine and shit stirrer. -1 keep him locked up

i agree -1

[I-am-Iconic]

I wouldn't call myself friends with Canary, but nobody -1ing is talking about the docs at all, these are all personal opinions, he's a shit talker, so are some of the biggest names on Synergy, who gives a fuck, shove your opinions in you ass unless you're talking about actual bannable offenses

Edited December 29, 2025 by I-am-Iconic

[I-am-Iconic 16]

I wouldn't call myself friends with Canary, but nobody -1ing is talking about the docs at all, these are all personal opinions, he's a shit talker, so are some of the biggest names on Synergy, who gives a fuck, shove your opinions in you ass unless you're talking about actual bannable offenses

Edited December 29, 2025 by I-am-Iconic

[Forseen]

If people would have listened to me back in the day when I said that having an email address passed around when people hold a position was a bad idea, then nobody would be in this position.

People's inherent need to want to be remembered for doing something that nobody else has done, has made people come up with stupid ideas that people think are great without actually looking at the potential downsides or capability of people that want to destroy things to do so.

If this had been better managed or actual proper consideration taken, then this empty "threat" wouldn't have even meant anything. I feel like this is just as much the fault of the leadership as it is this person mucking around.

Also - pretty sure most of you would be joking around the same with eachother, be careful. People you think are your friends online will throw you under the bus first chance they get 7/10 times.

 

I reckon give him another chance. +1

[Forseen 1,351]

If people would have listened to me back in the day when I said that having an email address passed around when people hold a position was a bad idea, then nobody would be in this position.

People's inherent need to want to be remembered for doing something that nobody else has done, has made people come up with stupid ideas that people think are great without actually looking at the potential downsides or capability of people that want to destroy things to do so.

If this had been better managed or actual proper consideration taken, then this empty "threat" wouldn't have even meant anything. I feel like this is just as much the fault of the leadership as it is this person mucking around.

Also - pretty sure most of you would be joking around the same with eachother, be careful. People you think are your friends online will throw you under the bus first chance they get 7/10 times.

 

I reckon give him another chance. +1

[Funnyman]

1 minute ago, Berries said:

 @Funnyman the comparison was they're both months ago one of them was called valid the other one wasn't called valid. something happened to one the other didn't happen Its really that simple

Again im not in charge of player reports, hence I cannot tell you why they decided brop wasnt going to be banned. Second, canary is already banned, its not like we are talking about rebanning him, and doc deletion is taken a bit more seriously than slurs

2 minutes ago, Forseen said:

If people would have listened to me back in the day when I said that having an email address passed around when people hold a position was a bad idea, then nobody would be in this position.

People's inherent need to want to be remembered for doing something that nobody else has done, has made people come up with stupid ideas that people think are great without actually looking at the potential downsides or capability of people that want to destroy things to do so.

If this had been better managed or actual proper consideration taken, then this empty "threat" wouldn't have even meant anything. I feel like this is just as much the fault of the leadership as it is this person mucking around.

Also - pretty sure most of you would be joking around the same with eachother, be careful. People you think are your friends online will throw you under the bus first chance they get 7/10 times.

 

I reckon give him another chance. +1

twin i think the people you talked to about handing emails out long resigned

[Funnyman 203]

1 minute ago, Berries said:

 @Funnyman the comparison was they're both months ago one of them was called valid the other one wasn't called valid. something happened to one the other didn't happen Its really that simple

Again im not in charge of player reports, hence I cannot tell you why they decided brop wasnt going to be banned. Second, canary is already banned, its not like we are talking about rebanning him, and doc deletion is taken a bit more seriously than slurs

2 minutes ago, Forseen said:

If people would have listened to me back in the day when I said that having an email address passed around when people hold a position was a bad idea, then nobody would be in this position.

People's inherent need to want to be remembered for doing something that nobody else has done, has made people come up with stupid ideas that people think are great without actually looking at the potential downsides or capability of people that want to destroy things to do so.

If this had been better managed or actual proper consideration taken, then this empty "threat" wouldn't have even meant anything. I feel like this is just as much the fault of the leadership as it is this person mucking around.

Also - pretty sure most of you would be joking around the same with eachother, be careful. People you think are your friends online will throw you under the bus first chance they get 7/10 times.

 

I reckon give him another chance. +1

twin i think the people you talked to about handing emails out long resigned

[Memetine]

-1. 

You do nothing but badmouth Synergy in that "non-related" synergy discord. You actively call people Pedophiles and post photos of people and clown on them. You're just toxic and bring nothing but terrible vibes.

Edited December 29, 2025 by Memetine

[Memetine 24]

-1. 

You do nothing but badmouth Synergy in that "non-related" synergy discord. You actively call people Pedophiles and post photos of people and clown on them. You're just toxic and bring nothing but terrible vibes.

Edited December 29, 2025 by Memetine

[Bleach]

-1 EXTREMELEY VALID REASON FOR BAN

[Bleach 1,192]

-1 EXTREMELEY VALID REASON FOR BAN

[Zensras]

fuck it,  +1.  This is so fucking stupid and straying off the topic.

So many people have joked about deleting documents before, including those who have had a lasting impact on the server.   Several people in this same thread have made the same jokes, and yet nothing happened to them.    The fact that he was banned A MONTH LATER for a joke in a non-synergy discord OFF THE COMMUNITY that someone reported due to not liking him is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.  

The other shit,  High staff can look into and can decide for themselves.   This is an appeal for the threatening to delete docs.  Not being a shittalker.

And the fact that Forseen is +1ing this is insane.   

Edited December 29, 2025 by Zensras

[Zensras 239]

fuck it,  +1.  This is so fucking stupid and straying off the topic.

So many people have joked about deleting documents before, including those who have had a lasting impact on the server.   Several people in this same thread have made the same jokes, and yet nothing happened to them.    The fact that he was banned A MONTH LATER for a joke in a non-synergy discord OFF THE COMMUNITY that someone reported due to not liking him is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.  

The other shit,  High staff can look into and can decide for themselves.   This is an appeal for the threatening to delete docs.  Not being a shittalker.

And the fact that Forseen is +1ing this is insane.   

Edited December 29, 2025 by Zensras

[Canary]

1 minute ago, Memetine said:

-1. 

You do nothing but badmouth Synergy in that "non-related" synergy discord. You actively call people Pedophiles and post photos of people and clown on them. You're just toxic and bring nothing but terrible vibes.

May I know specifically who I called a pedophile? As well as I believe I have the right to speak freely about whatever I would like in a non Synergy discord. I'm allowed to have an opinion.

[Canary 51]

1 minute ago, Memetine said:

-1. 

You do nothing but badmouth Synergy in that "non-related" synergy discord. You actively call people Pedophiles and post photos of people and clown on them. You're just toxic and bring nothing but terrible vibes.

May I know specifically who I called a pedophile? As well as I believe I have the right to speak freely about whatever I would like in a non Synergy discord. I'm allowed to have an opinion.

[Dono]

-1 go play warthunder

[Dono 523]

-1 go play warthunder

[Deathtiger]

-1 just a Toxic and negative person

[Deathtiger 100]

-1 just a Toxic and negative person

[Dono]

4 minutes ago, Canary said:

Airing out the fact that I refused to participate in a late night training because one I was on another game (Warthunder) and two I wasn't leaving one game to get on just to do one training at night. The fact that you are continuing to bring this up what five months after this happened is childish Dono.

sorry forgot to mention that you cause endless amounts of drama and should not have your ban appealed for a lot more time. -1 

[Dono 523]

4 minutes ago, Canary said:

Airing out the fact that I refused to participate in a late night training because one I was on another game (Warthunder) and two I wasn't leaving one game to get on just to do one training at night. The fact that you are continuing to bring this up what five months after this happened is childish Dono.

sorry forgot to mention that you cause endless amounts of drama and should not have your ban appealed for a lot more time. -1 

[whck56]

-1 hardly had any interactions with you but when I did you were disrespectful. 

[whck56 9]

-1 hardly had any interactions with you but when I did you were disrespectful. 

[Forseen]

15 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

twin i think the people you talked to about handing emails out long resigned

Literally says in the screenshots that he still has the fox email and that's how he was going to delete the docs :)

[Forseen 1,351]

15 minutes ago, Funnyman said:

twin i think the people you talked to about handing emails out long resigned

Literally says in the screenshots that he still has the fox email and that's how he was going to delete the docs :)

[Funnyman]

Just now, Forseen said:

Literally says in the screenshots that he still has the fox email and that's how he was going to delete the docs :)

oh I know that, but the people who you talked to about email passout being a bad idea are not on the server anymore

[Funnyman 203]

Just now, Forseen said:

Literally says in the screenshots that he still has the fox email and that's how he was going to delete the docs :)

oh I know that, but the people who you talked to about email passout being a bad idea are not on the server anymore

[BUB]

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED.

For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Coordinator+.

You may re-request a waive for appeal in 6 months.

// LOCKED
// MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED

Edited December 29, 2025 by BUB

[BUB 223]

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED.

For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Coordinator+.

You may re-request a waive for appeal in 6 months.

// LOCKED
// MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED

Edited December 29, 2025 by BUB