Tide

+1 fix this mans model' shit got a wonky ass head!

5/5/5 "leave no witnesses" - Rex "Why did you kill all the civilians" - Rex "They were witnesses" - Everyone

I will contact forum staff to get the post removed and contact management so I can repost it

I don't dislike Kaiser at all. Specifically I think its dumb that he could write "WO+ making biased or way too harsh arrests". I strongly disagree with this statement and think it's absolutely wrong. @Cucumber @KaiserNeiner

Unsure of which management you are referring to whether it be directors+ or CG management. I did inform multiple people that I wanted this to be added CG. From everyone I talked to the only response I ever got was a "Its never going to happen" and never a direct "no". Shady never directly said yes or no. He was more on the line of thought "its never going to happen". I figured the worse that could happen is that this suggestion gets giga -1'd and CG figures out a different plan.

+1 Make 501st unstoppable; LONG LIVE VADER'S FIST!

An outside BCMD isn't needed. Non-GC HC members have already stated everything you plan to do; sadly they have not been given the option to enact anything. Proposed document changes/updates, CG standards, and many other things have been denied by "old" HC. If the new blood of CG were allowed a small amount of time to act without being denied CG would be greatly improved. Additionally in CG; HC is CMD+. Which I find abysmal when compared to other battalions.

-1 as a current CG officer I have seen you actively do nothing to benefit the battalion for the better. You have actively gone against every suggestion brought up to better CG. You are a strong supporter of the CG TS channel being locked and never open. I have also personally seen you play different sides to different parties with your own personal interest in mind. You also lied to your own officer corp about a "merit" form; which you now are calling for a officer wipe, because the vast majority of CG officers want to take the battalion in a different direction. Finally you have spent exactly 217 days as a commander; which is 2.4 Fox terms. If you couldn't better CG in that time frame as a commander; why would you as Fox?

-1 as a CG officer; I think the core of CG hasn't been heard from regarding many issues. Myself and many other officers have been pushing over the past two months to create change in CG; however has been disregarded or flat out denied by HC that changes are needed. Previously officers were told that CG public imagine was "not bad" and it was only a select few people with large influence that dislike us. I however was on the opposite side; I think and still do if the current CG core is allowed to take control that changes will be made. I myself have recently put in a server suggestion that CG gets a batonless trainee WL. I was told by countless people both in CG and outside of CG it would never happen. I have also played a major role in creating new documents to strengthen CGs enlisted ranks and NCO ranks; however was told my documents weren't needed and would "kill" CG. The misinformation being spread about CG is absolutely absurd and frankly is seems like a witch hunt started due to CGs previous BCMD not getting along with others on the server. I want to make it 1000% clear that CG HC are the ones keeping CG from making large needed changes; THAT BEING SAID! There are current members of CG actively trying to fix the issues and reach the ranks needed to actually have any voice. Allowing someone outside of the battalion to swoop in and start making the decision the current CG officer corp has is an insult. To address certain things you directly said in your application: 1. Open Communication: The CG officer corp has already stated the report form is old, outdated, and doesn't allow for problems to be fixed. HC disregarded our concerns and haven't taken any steps to replace/figure out a new system. The officer corp however has; I MYSELF disregarded HC and had the CG main channel unlocked. HC stated the CG main channel was locked due to minges "ear raping" past CG. Cg has gone through multiple minge-cons without a single issue. 2. Officer Evaluations: I do like this suggestion; however one of CGs CMDs openly stated "CMD is only backend". A CG CMD only believing their job duties includes backend work is absurd! In addition CG HC really only ever contact its officer during the bi monthly officer meeting or when they feel the officer is "inactive". Additionally to address your comment about the two senior officers feeling standing up to CG authority would get them removed. The CG officer corp is not listened to and not allowed to make any decisions. In many other battalions CPT is considered a senior officer; however in CG they are not. I am unaware of why this a thing; however it only allows more power to be funneled to the CG HC. Even majors in CG have no voice; there concerns and suggestions being waived off as not "important". Finally it is my own held belief that CG in the past and currently as I write this is directed by people who are complaisant and afraid to embrace anything new; however the officer corp is not. 3.Respect CG In Game: Many people like to poke fun and laugh at CG for being "bad" with the baton; however it is a more complex issue. Due to server lag, events, and people crowding around baton arresting someone becomes a lot harder. The baton also regularly has an issue with perfectly placed hits not being registered. Unfortunately all the baton training in the world will not fix these issues; however myself and other CG members have and continue to try and teach new/inexperienced members how to better use the baton. 4. Pushing ROA's: Again this suggestion has been made to CG HC; they responded with "Directors won't approve it". Myself and many many many CG members believe the only 2 AOS offenses should be RDM, Hate Speech, and Heavy ERP. All three of these offense greatly impact the fun and mood of the server; unlike most other arrest-able offenses that can have time taken to be investigated. Unfortunately due to comments made by past and some current CG HC enlisted, NCOs, SNCOs, and Officers are told to arrest first and let staff deal with it after for AOSs. The idea of pushing for ROAs to be used more is not a new one; however CG HC either didn't care enough or didn't believe it would be approved; either way it is absolutely a horrible look for CG. 5. Sub-Units: The idea of altering DS is again not new; however once again CG HC did nothing to change it. Currently myself and some CG officers are working to alter DS in a more SWAT like sub-unit. This process takes time when you aren't super well connected like some others on the server. Tracker however needs a more open field to actually flourish; I myself want the massiff WL to stop being an "event job" and to be freely used on the server. I am also a huge supporter that massiff be accessible to any VIP on the server who can pass the tryout. 6. Bridging The Gap With Staff: I agree many CG staff members do know what they are doing; however the disconnect is they not being fully literate of the arrest rules. Luckily Rohan has started to take steps forward already. The update to the server rules and arrest guidelines was much needed and begged for by many CG officers; however again GC HC felt like it wouldn't get approved by the directors. Final Thoughts: It is in my opinion that many issues with CG stem from CG HC being lazy, complaisant, disheartened, or oblivious. CG WILL GET BETTER IF THE NEW LINE OF CG OFFICERS IS ALLOWED TO MAKE THE CHANGES THEY WANT! Please, considered allowing current CG members to fix their own battalion and create a better future for CG and the server!

+1 In all honesty you have the drive and passion to be a great BCMD. The articulation and understanding you've shown while dealing with CG relation things has been amazing. I also know from personal experience that you are flexible and open to anything.

+1 Trauma's unit deserves more love! They do a lot of great work and need to be rewarded!

We are fully preparing for that change in numbers; by the time the suggestion is implemented our NCO core and above will be ready to step up

Indeed, Vorix is fully in support of this change being added to CG!

The trainee period would depend on each individual person and how long it takes them to learn. CG however is working on internal documents to gauge a persons readiness for baton use. I would say in most cases the trainee period would be 5-7 days. We are also working on a mentorship program to help enlisted in difficult situations they may encounter. In regards to the officer core of CG; currently we have the majority in favor of it.

CG not in dead last; I'll take that W.