KillJoy Posted October 30, 2021 Banned Posted October 30, 2021 Name:KillJoy/Mortar RP Rank:CSM Suggestion:LFS AA Gun/Turret and the TX 160 Implementation:Event Server or main server Event Vehicle Lore:AA Gun goes Burr against Ships Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2538159767 (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Current: Last good 104th Yoda Past spots: 501st XO, 501st CMD, 501st WO Appo, TC Hardcase, 332nd Officer , ATK Reg Purge, Keller Unit Vinnie, General Luminara, 41st GCO ARCL Draa, 3rd Crosshair on the Server, Hunter, Sith Marauder, Alpha 66 Muzzle, TRO, GMM, VA x3. CIS Tac Droid, Guild Cabinet Member, Guild Marshall Embo, Guild LT, ARCM Colt, Dash 44, Wolfpack Mortarx2, Naval Jedi Lead Capt, SHDXO 02, Null-10 Jaing, Null-5 Prudii, Null-11 Ordo, Alpha of the Order, Baylan Skoll x2, Thorn, Kit Fisto, Hound, Gearshift, Waxer, Military Advisor, and Yoda but didn’t get distinguished even tho clutch did after his three day term - thanks Soda
Banned Posted October 30, 2021 Name:KillJoy/Mortar RP Rank:CSM Suggestion:LFS AA Gun/Turret and the TX 160 Implementation:Event Server or main server Event Vehicle Lore:AA Gun goes Burr against Ships Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2538159767 (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Current: Last good 104th Yoda Past spots: 501st XO, 501st CMD, 501st WO Appo, TC Hardcase, 332nd Officer , ATK Reg Purge, Keller Unit Vinnie, General Luminara, 41st GCO ARCL Draa, 3rd Crosshair on the Server, Hunter, Sith Marauder, Alpha 66 Muzzle, TRO, GMM, VA x3. CIS Tac Droid, Guild Cabinet Member, Guild Marshall Embo, Guild LT, ARCM Colt, Dash 44, Wolfpack Mortarx2, Naval Jedi Lead Capt, SHDXO 02, Null-10 Jaing, Null-5 Prudii, Null-11 Ordo, Alpha of the Order, Baylan Skoll x2, Thorn, Kit Fisto, Hound, Gearshift, Waxer, Military Advisor, and Yoda but didn’t get distinguished even tho clutch did after his three day term - thanks Soda
Conrad Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 +1 but really only for the turret. The tx looks silly and we don't need "just a different looking tx" C
Posted October 30, 2021 +1 but really only for the turret. The tx looks silly and we don't need "just a different looking tx" C
Marvel Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 This was denied not that long ago when I suggested it. I believe they had some issues with the pack and also didn’t want the TX-160 since it’s basically just the TX-130 2
Posted October 30, 2021 This was denied not that long ago when I suggested it. I believe they had some issues with the pack and also didn’t want the TX-160 since it’s basically just the TX-130 2
Alec Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 +1 for the AA, the tank seems kinda like it would just be the same as TX130
Dyn Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 +1 I don't really care for the somewhat different TX, but I think the turret seems nice maybe as an alternative to the AV-7 (which can sometimes cause crashes for people's games). This is also the assumption that they can't fix the issue that Marvel mentioned though. Former 21st Formerly known as CastleClone
Posted October 30, 2021 +1 I don't really care for the somewhat different TX, but I think the turret seems nice maybe as an alternative to the AV-7 (which can sometimes cause crashes for people's games). This is also the assumption that they can't fix the issue that Marvel mentioned though. Former 21st Formerly known as CastleClone
Finn Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 The screenshots look like you can have the turret on LAATs, which would be hilarious. +1 for sure. I don't think it'll get accepted if it was previously denied for technical issues, but I hope Maxwells can fix whatever issue there was before. Command Team Union Representative | Longest Serving Attack Regimental Commander Master of Quests | 212th Shadow BCMD | Retired
Posted October 30, 2021 The screenshots look like you can have the turret on LAATs, which would be hilarious. +1 for sure. I don't think it'll get accepted if it was previously denied for technical issues, but I hope Maxwells can fix whatever issue there was before. Command Team Union Representative | Longest Serving Attack Regimental Commander Master of Quests | 212th Shadow BCMD | Retired
Maxwells Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 This was actually planned to be added however there is already too many vehicles. I have said it multiple times the addition of more vehicles will just end up in people just not using it. Also the physics model for this is kinda broken btw. 1 <--- You reading this
Posted October 31, 2021 This was actually planned to be added however there is already too many vehicles. I have said it multiple times the addition of more vehicles will just end up in people just not using it. Also the physics model for this is kinda broken btw. 1 <--- You reading this
Maxwells Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Quote Denial reasons: (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.) Not providing sufficient information. Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use. The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s). Ex: 35MB for one model. Majority negative feedback. Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server. Having multiple suggestions within one thread. Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion. Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial. <--- You reading this
Posted October 31, 2021 Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Quote Denial reasons: (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.) Not providing sufficient information. Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use. The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s). Ex: 35MB for one model. Majority negative feedback. Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server. Having multiple suggestions within one thread. Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion. Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial. <--- You reading this
Recommended Posts