Jump to content

Guac

Forum Admin
  • Posts

    1,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Guac

  1. now? bottom of the list
  2. vile and disgusting behavior. get this man banned asap !! !
  3. This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  4. This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  5. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  6. It seems like you have a misunderstanding of how the flight rules work. Pilot JOBS will always have priority over NON-PILOT jobs; regardless of player pop. The outcome you want is already in place, you just need to start enforcing it. The playerpop rules however, are what stipulate for which jobs can have vehicles spawned. This is for server HEALTH reasons. If you want the broader rule changed of who can fly in general, that would require a separate suggestion.
  7. As far as I am aware, don't support JOBS still have priority in all cases in flying? Like how medics have priority in medical RP and medbay, engineers in engine room, etc? Those numbers are the arbitrary line drawn to ensure that a lower density of people have the ability to take out a plane to reduce lag.
  8. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  9. Because of the mando belt, unless I were to go back and edit every Null model, it’s a massive pain. I’ll save you the trouble of waiting till 2025 for this to actually get implemented and deny it here.
  10. What lore are you using to inform this suggestion? Also, is IC having a difficult time keeping up in 41st? From all my time I’ve spent on the server once IC was added it was almost always full. I just can’t get behind the idea that every single subunit needs something added to get “fair” with other ones. I’d like to mention as well, that I believe that the server has too many jobs with jetpacks. While you may not consider a jetpack an “op” suggestion, the advantage it provides in many cases is staggering. If you don’t believe me, ask any GM whose events were ruined by them. This isn’t to say you are making this suggestion in bad faith, just wanted to contextualize the impact that I feel like is going unnoticed. As far as development goes, it wouldn’t be difficult at all. The problem is however, is that each of these jetpacks are an entity. That means extra lag and extra problems. Just imagine an extra 5 vehicles spawned in at all times. This all to say, that suggesting a buff like this for a subunit should truly only be done when all else fails. Under any amount of scrutiny, the reasoning for such a change falls apart. Unless you have info that I don’t, I don’t see the need nor importance of a change like this.
  11. Unfortunately this suggestion has been DENIED. For more information on why this suggestion was denied, please contact a Forum Admin+ // LOCKED // MOVED TO FORUM SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  12. Wrong section.
  13. Question Answered
  14. We don’t have a public content pack. You will need to find the prop packs used individually. I would ask a VA for assistance.
  15. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Due to lag cause by this vehicle, and previous removal of it as well, this suggestion is denied.
  16. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  17. Based and shitpilled ban +1
  18. Love these changes. Only issues I see is bacta nades. I don't see what stops any subunit from requesting their designated medic to have bacta nades as well, if given to Aven. Unless you have reasoning past "he is the medic".
  19. This issue has been marked as resolved and therefore has been resolved on server or is unresolvable. // LOCKED // MOVED TO RESOLVED REPORTS
  20. This was intended and will not be fixed without a server suggestion.
  21. This has been marked as acknowledged and marked as a bug that is being looked into. This will remain unlocked in the case that more information becomes present. // MOVING TO ACKNOWLEDGED REPORTS
  22. This has been marked as acknowledged and marked as a bug that is being looked into. This will remain unlocked in the case that more information becomes present. // MOVING TO ACKNOWLEDGED REPORTS
  23. This issue has been marked as resolved and therefore has been resolved on server or is unresolvable. // LOCKED // MOVED TO RESOLVED REPORTS
  24. This was intended and will not be fixed without a server suggestion.
  25. +1… I wonder who made that amazing model 🤭
×
×
  • Create New...