Guac

Before I cast my vote, I hope you understand I FULLY comprehend the use for these JT's and you reasoning for them. With that being said, -1. DU's job is to provide for a defensive front and being experts in such maneuverings. You mention of lancer is understandable but HS's intention is to be a fast based, non-defensive squad. This again, does not apply to the rest of DU. Your mention of subunits quite confused me on the intention of such but thats besides the point. I believe this suggestion has long term implications on the use of DU if passed for the future. TL;DR - DU is a defensive battalion. JT wouldn't make sense in any capacity. It wouldn't be "unfair", it would just be redundant. imo.

There is no need for that shit to be that loud lmao +1

-1, after reading those after me I changed my opinion. There seems to be far better options to serve as replacements for these roles.

I understand that, they still have 0 use. With the merge of PLT and ENG I don't see it to boost activity nor balance. I'm glad it was lost in the update, I want it to stay that way.

There is a format [Clone Wars] Bug Report - [CW] Bug Reports - SYNERGY (synergyroleplay.com) You should follow it

I currently don't see a need for any of these characters to have a turret. This isn't for balancing purposes nor is it in any way lore accurate. I wouldn't be apposed to adding these in for staff to spawn only but not for all of these positions. -1

Why is this even still up lmao -1

-1, although unintentional PROP kills should not be aos'd imo

We don't need more senators, we need better senators. Quality>quantity. -1

I may of plus one'd if you assigned just one HS member to a shield, being the "heavy guy". At its current standing though.. -1

+1 sounds cool!

If this passes... may ratio have mercy on us... +1

I don't feel like this would be useful or necessary imo. This would simply detract from the responsibilities and purposes of the RCMD. If you want to RP with a REG and be their "assistant" than hop on civi and change ya name. -1 for me until I see a convincing argument that portrays a use for these people.

Ya know what, I may of +1'd if you had made more of a convincing argument. With that being said, I ain't convinced. We should take into consideration that a battalion recently was fucking n u k e d because of failing leadership. Kinda redundant to thin our forces even more. Lets work with what we have :)! -1 for now.

+1 PLEASE

-1 after hearing Bbstines statement

+1 ig lmao

-1 just press b 4head

Bug Type (Server:): CWRP Severity level (1-3): 2 ig Evidence (if you can): https://imgur.com/Q9X4Tvx Description of the bug: Regular troopers have the DC-17m pistols while RC (at least Gregor) have the standard trooper pistols. How can we recreate it: Go on standard trooper jobs with dualies than look at me Gregor and maybe other RC.

+1

From what I see here you owned up to your actions and have had plenty time to mature. +1.

+1 sounds cool!

This is a touchy subject for most. Although I agree with you many will say "well I bought it". Tbh I don't think that's a valid argument. Many abuse the Mando sniper (fire 4 shots at nothing in rapid succession and save the last to beam someone) and I do believe it hurts a lot of events and such. It will be a +1 for me but im willing to have my mind changed.

-1