Jump to content

Guac

Forum Admin
  • Posts

    1,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Guac

  1. Bro didn’t read anything I posted 💀 I -1’d the original suggestion for the same reason. Think before you type.
  2. -1
  3. Most of the time, Event job PVP is such a tedious nad unfun experience, for the player and GM. Balancing realism and withstanding the full might of 30 troopers blasting you is not an easy task. Health bars would give purpose to a larger health pool, as well as create an engaging environment for players. This would ease the tension that is placed on GMs in this aspect I believe. Another great suggestion babe, +1
  4. Good intention, however I don't think this is the best course of action. -1
  5. Can Directors change job descriptions within the F4 menu?
  6. I don't believe this was an intentional switch / removal on behalf of the founders / dev's. In that case I will be moving this to bug reports.
  7. Question: Why was the "Give every clone DC-17 single pistol" suggestion denied Comments/Concerns: Curious Staff Member you're asking: @Jad Additional info:
  8. Question Answered
  9. Cap. then they wouldn't of had the best Gregor of all time after him
  10. I believe he is referencing anything outside of ingame.
  11. I really don't think that someone saying "These numbers look familiar? 123?!" or stupid shit like that should be ban-able, nor do I think that is the intention of any member of leadership. The only instance of which I have seen this punished to a larger extent was when an individual reached out to a member of the community he had not known well at all to make such a joke. No one person is scouring every facet of this community to find people who make jokes about knowing someone's IP. With that being said, I do disagree with the current ruling. I'd much rather these instances be reported on a case-by-case basis, and then punishment be taken if need be. Even if it is a joke, have that discretion of punishment be up to the staff members involved. +1 if being done instead case by case.
  12. Guac

    Warp LAAT/c

    +1 totally if it is possible> I know when welding anything to a LAAT/i and attempting to warp, the prop does not go with it, not sure if it would work with entitles.
  13. Unless this brings up concerns for balancing I do not see an issue. +1
  14. Question Answered
  15. Guac

    Shippy Ship

    May I ask then why it was denied and not just kept in prep phase, or something of the sort.
  16. Guac

    Shippy Ship

    I would have to disagree with most of these statements on here. I see the V-Wing used countless times, the HMP is also an event based ship that for whatever reason is disabled right now, which saw many uses before it was. Additionally, most of these things you are suggesting come in packs, so I am not sure you can just "sacrifice" them. This addon was suggested before, and for 2 ships it is massive in comparison to our other ships. For context, a pack that harbors a large majority of our current vehicles is only a tad bit larger than this. I assume @Forseen can clarify further as he was the one who denied it the first time. TL;DR - Not worth sacrificing anything for this pack imo -1
  17. Guac

    Pistol for Medics

    -1
  18. Gonna agree with what Comics said. The map just doesn't support the important yet menial day-to-day shit. While I think that the map is sick asf and would serve as a really cool maybe 1 day thing; I doubt we could stay for longer. -1
  19. I don't think this suggestion is to remove anyone access to shields, just to add it to heavies. Your priority for protection of VIP's would still exist.
  20. Heavy is a shitty job and weapon balances are too complicated, ez addition right here +1
  21. 10-4, I wasn't aware of any issues previously so that is interesting. Hopefully yall can get it fixed! Thanks
  22. It feels as though members of this server are so incredibly short sighted some times. This removal could very well be any battalion, it's just awfully convenient that DU is in such a poor state that many consider them for removal. There are some legitimate reasons for their removal as explained by @Marveland @Comics. In some ways yes, they are fundamentally flawed. However, for those speaking solely off activity and recent times, I want you to consider this being your battalion. Rancor for weeks, just a few months ago, had around 7 active members, 501st has had some of the most fluctuating member count over the servers history, 21st had to be wiped at one point due to the sheer structural issues within it. Now this isn't a dig at these battalions, I am merely trying to put into context of this hive mindset of "REMOVE CUZ BAD", and how it is incredibly frustrating to those who have devoted time and resources to this battalion. I'll abstain from voting for now.
  23. I think remember seeing it gone within the same waive the color too was as well. Doubt there was any lag issues as I had used it countless times previously with 0 issues.
×
×
  • Create New...