Jump to content

Eagle

Member
  • Posts

    718
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Eagle

  1. To me it seems really nice for KU to have HVO Just be sure you really want it to be KU exclusive and not battalion wide As a BCMD I trust you to do the right thing for 21st +1
  2. +1 Even though he can be, in my opinion, be quite funny sometimes, I think a ban is needed. He keeps breaking the rules and doesn't stop
  3. +1 I trust Kaiser on this.
  4. +1 Go naval!
  5. +1 I really like the idea
  6. +1 if it was not removed because of lag
  7. I get where this is coming from and I also have mixed feelings about DU, but I am not in favor of removing battalions. Keep in mind that through removing a battalion you are also removing a place for a group of people to have fun and to do stuff together. From personal experience I can even say that not all people will stay on the server after their battalion gets removed. This could be because they are not able to find a battalion which they fit in and/or are still feeling bad about their own battalion being removed. Honestly how would you feel if your battalion gets removed? I took a half year break since I just did not want to play on the server for a while after a battalion I put a lot of time in got removed! Also you are saying that it is the most problematic battalion. This might be true, but this changes over time. In the past it was 327th, then it was DU, it has been CG for a while and now it is DU again. This should not be a reason to remove a battalion. I think, just like @Pythin said, that DU needs to get the ball rolling again. I also think that a lot or even too much of the "fat" got trimmed a while back when 187th, 327th and 91st got removed. I do not see a problem with the current amount of battalions. The reason why I like the server so much is because of the many specializations and removing another battalion is making the server only going to look worse in my opinion. Also, what battalion is going to be next after DU? 104th, 21st or Rancor since they have a dip in their activity? Overall I just dont think it is a good idea to remove a battalion at this point. -1
  8. -1 I Agree wtih Conrad
  9. +1
  10. +1 cool idea
  11. I think it is made to be for SOBDE or troops who can detect cloacked enemies. I also don't see what the current issue is with ARF. Heavy just has an extra weapon, medics get medical tools, support gets more tools and most of them are fixated on RP and ARF gets a sniper which is actually fine. -1
  12. Brian Limmond
  13. +1
  14. +1 good song
  15. +1
  16. +1 I don't see why this would be a problem
  17. -1 The DPS of that sniper is 240. Which is worse than the snipers from the vendor, but still better than almost all other job weapons. I personally don't see why this weapon should be buffed.
  18. Eagle

    New main map!

    -1 I really like the current map and how GMs can use it for events. I also like that currently planets can be claimed to conduct different trainings in different enviroments. The current map is also really well optimized. I think there are better picks for a map change.
  19. Eagle

    DC-17m Buff

    -1 it already is a pretty strong weapon.
  20. +1 It would be nice for foxtrot to be a well equiped team
  21. I agree with this man
×
×
  • Create New...