Jump to content

Dilqui

Member
  • Posts

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Dilqui last won the day on August 1 2022

Dilqui had the most liked content!

About Dilqui

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Dilqui's Achievements

Forum Sheep

Forum Sheep (2/7)

27

Reputation

  1. Name: Anderson RP Rank: 212th CMD | VA Suggestion: Revamp the robot questions to actually ask for stuff that is taught in the CC room. As of current, the bot asks formation questions and other such things that aren't taught anymore, and stuff that someone completely new to Starwars RP may not be aware of. The bot questions need to be updated to better reflect the information inside the CC room. Implementation: Some changing of the bot questions. Existing players will not be affected, but at the same time with the influx of new people we are experiencing we should take the opportunity to revamp it now. Lore: None. Workshop content if applicable: None. (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development")
  2. True, it is hard to get event jobs, specially for big events with multiple EJ's. That being said, given that almost everyone on the server is VIP, I don't see this being as much of an issue as is maybe suggested. I don't think allowing non-VIP's to get EJs is going to make it easier is what I'm saying, since that would only free up... what, 2 or 3 more people in the normal pop rotation to be eligible for it? Doesn't mean they will automatically take it though.
  3. Yo 148, 3-to-the-3-to-the-6-to-the-9. Representin' the ABQ. What up, biatch? Leave it at the tone!

  4. Having read and re-read the OP, I'll go ahead and throw in my two cents. Neutral on the Training changes. They could be good, but I'm super weary of making stuff take longer. Getting ARC trainings already are a huge pain, so unless you are seriously going to ramp up how many are hosted this may just make it much harder to get things moving. Also, I'm curious: If people have passed selections, but for some reason or another haven't completed the other two, do they have to re-do selections under the new system you are thinking of implementing? +1 on the ARCT. I like the idea and I'm in favor of letting people "play around" with their new toys, yes there is potential for abuse but as long as its monitored this shouldn't be a big issue. -1 on mandatory recerts. Unless you are going to significantly change the content of the trainings, there is no need. And if you ARE significantly changing the trainings, well, then this is a wipe in all but name. Note that I said mandatory recerts. If you instead allowed recert as a current Arc as an option rather than mandatory I think you'd get a lot less pushback, people that aren't interested in retaking it won't complain and those that want to be caught up to snuff will have the option and ability to do so. Anderson
×
×
  • Create New...