Forseen

As funny as that'd be, it'd be better off doing it the other way I'd think...

Then CG wouldn't be able to arrest them and it'd require a staff member every time, which is counter productive to the issue this is trying to solve. Another solution might be to use the armory for RP arrests as there is a rayshield area in there.

You obviously didn't really test to see if this was an issue - It was literally the first thing tested by Jad, Square, Jayarr, and myself when we tested the map on Dev server and you cannot glitch out of them. I wouldn't mind this idea, but where would we put this area? The map is packed pretty tightly.

I've just looked back over your last ban appeal and realized that you were banned on both accounts when using an alt account which is improper protocol. Correct protocol for this situation is as follows; You are to be asked which account you consider your main account to be. You are then to be banned on all accounts that are not that account. Seeing as that is not what has happened here, this will be accepted. However, also reading your previous ban appeal I see a LONG list of previous instances where you have created issues on our server, as per this you will be put on a probationary period upon returning. The probationary period entails the following; A 1 month 0 tolerance period, where if you intentionally create issues on the server, you will be permanently banned immediately. A following, 2 month period where you will be watched and monitored by the staff/high staff team in which if you are constantly causing issues, you will be permanently banned again. A 6 month blacklist from being able to apply for the staff team or any other type of authoritarian role within the community. Congratulations! Your ban appeal has been ACCEPTED. You may be contacted by a Director+ to discuss your return. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - ACCEPTED

This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO TEAMSPEAK SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED

This must have been missed at some point - SO is considered a Sub-Unit through the eyes of the server as per the standardization update that we did a little while ago.

Congratulations! Your ban appeal has been ACCEPTED. You may be contacted by a Director+ to discuss your return. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - ACCEPTED

This hasn't received any further legitimate input in a few days, closing this. Question Answered

Have you tried clicking on the button that says "Locker" and removing it from that screen instead?

Could you please explain more so what is missing? Are the models you're referring to on the server (Q menu)? Also, if they do exist on the server (Q menu), please provide model strings.

Hi there, So just in case you don't already know, the way a lot of our formatted messages from Forum Staff or community VA+ work is that they're preset messages. Obviously with that being said, when denying things we go through and click the box for all the suggestions that will be denied so that we can move all of them at once. Like this: And then we select an option that automatically moves, locks & replies with the standard message and it will do this to all of the selected items at once. This is why we don't put denial reasons on everything. Usually when we go through suggestions and deny them, either myself or one of the other founders will attempt to get to most suggestions that we feel need explanation for denial or as many as we can to add the reasons on to the posts to avoid this. However, sometimes we get busy and because of that we may leave them blank sometimes, hence why we added the section saying to come to the Q&A Section to ask. Sorry about the above, I felt like there were a lot of people that didn't understand the process, so I wanted to clear it up. Moving on to the denial for the suggestion of the weight tool; This was a while ago, but if my memory serves me well then the main reason that we denied this was due to it being a very small and limited use case and that we felt that after a few weeks the add-on would no longer be used and it would be another thing for us to remove (this is a trend with most tools that get added to the game, such as the Advanced Precision tool, where it was used for 2 weeks then never touched again). Hope this message cleared up some confusion! :)

@Naffen

That's such a dumb reason as that doesn't allow for innovation. We've had these tags for like 2 years now, they're old and should be redone. However I agree that these new ones are not really that great once they were downsized by Teamspeak because their sizing has to be 16x16 which is dumb. @Jayarr, @Maverick & @Bananaberry tried doing something different with a bit of direction from @Square. I'm happy to change them back to the old ones but would appreciate new ones being made sometime soon that still look good. NGL - This probably should have been posted as a poll though.

Ohhhh, I thought it was just VA? My bad, thanks @Hanz <3

Imagine people that run the server having perms. Sounds dumb to me.

When it's on a player's back it is still considered an entity. This suggestion seems more about the movement and functionality of what is in this video or what is set as the default for the specific jetpack addon in this suggestion. Please note, even if we did look towards adding these jetpacks, the stats of the jetpack would be matched to the jetpacks we currently have on the server anyways as that was what was decided on when balancing them.

You obviously forgot that I spoke to you literal days after you posted this suggestion over Teamspeak saying that I'm looking into it. It's still being looked into and it's not as easy as y'all make it out to be. Please don't be so forgetful next time just to make me look bad @Jovanovic.

Congratulations! Your ban appeal has been ACCEPTED. You may be contacted by a Director+ to discuss your return. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - ACCEPTED

The next ban wipe is in late December. You're not on the community ban list, so you'll be unbanned at that time.

I personally had the opportunity of dealing with you earlier today prior to this ban. I was interested in what Freck was doing as he was doing a staff sit instead of being in our 104th training, so I sat there cloaked and listened to you yell at, swear at and be derogatory towards Freck for 5 minutes straight whilst Freck was trying to help solve your issue for you by contacting the person that AOSed you to see why it had happened. I then told Freck to leave as your behavior became bad enough to where I wasn't going to allow a member of the staff team to be spoken to the way you were talking to him, when he was trying to help you. After Freck left, you continued to abuse me constantly. I brought up you have 11 RECENT bans on record all for no intent to RP, to which your response was "I'm liked by 90% of the server." as if that excuses your behavior. I mentioned you obviously don't intend to play on the server legitimately and are only here to cause issues and you said "I keep getting arrested and banned, so how can I play on the server.". As I pointed out, 5/11 of your bans were administered by Head Admins @Bacta @Stix @Void & @Dennis, to which I can attribute these bans being legitimate. I told you that if you continue to cause issues on the server, you will be banned and won't be able to play on the server, to which I was met with more attitude and being cussed out again. I was about to ban you but decided to give you a chance and instead informed you that if you were to cause further issues for the staff team, then you would receive a longer ban time. I then informed staff in Admin chat that if you caused any further issues, to ban you until the next ban wipe (Perma-ban), which seems to be what happened with @Freck banning you. TLDR; You were acting like a dick and treating people trying to help you like they were a piece of garbage on the ground and not worth your time, and you were warned that further issues would result in a lengthened ban and you obviously didn't listen.

Question Answered

Question Answered

Just to point out a few things on the topic of senate commandos. (I spoke with Finn before he posted this and suggested he put it here for community feedback even after my points). Senate Commandos were given to the Senators to be able to use outside of the normal use of them being able to be used as event jobs under the strict ruling that the Senate Commando is not to become a position in which a player on the server will use as their main character and Senate Commandos must only be online when Senators are and must follow what the Senator says and will not have a position of authority. With the above being considered, please note the addon is 31mb for 3 models, is this worth the extra storage space on the server? @Finn Good luck with the suggestion. :)

Definitely! I think that conversation can be had at some point in time and we can discuss what the plan for the future with models may be.

Hi there! I can see a few people are looking at this thread so it seems to be quite a big topic. When we were going through suggestions, we looked at these models and although they are very nice models, we saw them not fitting with the direction that bounty hunters have gone in recently and hence didn't feel that this would create a positive RP environment for the bounty hunters running around as space pirates. This would just cause more headaches for the guild leader, who from what he was telling me is already dealing with people doing dumb things, we don't need this to encourage people to do extra dumb stuff. In terms of them being used for event jobs we decided against as we saw a very small use-case, I believe the topic was brought up that we didn't want this to be used for the first one-two weeks of it being added and then only seen once every three months like a few other events jobs we currently have in the F4 menu on the server. With the four of us being very old heads within the Clone Wars Role Play gamemode and the community, we are pretty certain that this would be the case. However, I believe we were open to having a discussion on the topic should we be looking to also remove some of the lesser used event jobs from the list to make some space as the list is starting to get very long and it would be nice to be able to take some load off of the server! Hope that answers any questions or concerns any of you might have had, if not please comment below and we can continue to discuss. This post can remain open for 24 hours to allow for people to comment to contribute information to the topic at hand before it should be closed @ Forum Mod/@ Forum Admin. To ensure all those that reacted to the original post get to see this, I will ping them in very small text. @Marvel@Cox@Guac@Naffen@Mavelle@JuJuishere