Ccmonty Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 Name: Monty Suggestion: Add Commander Greys battalion Implementation: Add a new battalion with 5 or 6 job slots Lore: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CC-10/994 Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1224172036 Special Buff: All Jobs (Except Trooper) get Grenades *Can be changed* Other: As no number was ever mentioned in the comic i was thinking we either call them the 66th Legion (As the first time they appear is in a order 66 comic) or Greys Group Pros: SEVEN Named Characters No Confirmed battalion number so this could be 612th if we want it to Because he appeared in a Disney comic he IS cannon Cons Not alot of lore reguarding background of battalion Only appeared in two comics Named Characters: Grey/ CC-10/994(BCMD): http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CC-10/994 Styles(CPT): http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Styles Stance/CT-1157: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CT-1157 Remo: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Remo Soot: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Soot Bigmouth: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Big-Mouth Kaylon: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Kaylon Mixx: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Mixx Subdivisions: Rostu Squad: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Rostu_Squad Job: Battalion Commander Grey Model: 612th Commander Ganch Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Dual DC-17, Grenades Other: BCMD job Job: Styles Model: 612th officer Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Grendaes Other: Named character Lore: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Styles Job: (Battalion) Heavy Trooper Model: 612th Heavy Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Z6 Rotary Blaster, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Jet Trooper Model: 612th Jet Trooper Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Trooper Model: 612th Trooper Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s Job: (Battalion) Medic Model: 612th Medic Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Medkit, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Sharpshooter Model: 612th Sharpshooter Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Republic Sniper, Grenades @Jayarr made all the models The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Posted February 26, 2018 Name: Monty Suggestion: Add Commander Greys battalion Implementation: Add a new battalion with 5 or 6 job slots Lore: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CC-10/994 Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1224172036 Special Buff: All Jobs (Except Trooper) get Grenades *Can be changed* Other: As no number was ever mentioned in the comic i was thinking we either call them the 66th Legion (As the first time they appear is in a order 66 comic) or Greys Group Pros: SEVEN Named Characters No Confirmed battalion number so this could be 612th if we want it to Because he appeared in a Disney comic he IS cannon Cons Not alot of lore reguarding background of battalion Only appeared in two comics Named Characters: Grey/ CC-10/994(BCMD): http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CC-10/994 Styles(CPT): http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Styles Stance/CT-1157: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CT-1157 Remo: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Remo Soot: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Soot Bigmouth: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Big-Mouth Kaylon: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Kaylon Mixx: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Mixx Subdivisions: Rostu Squad: http://starwarsrebels.wikia.com/wiki/Rostu_Squad Job: Battalion Commander Grey Model: 612th Commander Ganch Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Dual DC-17, Grenades Other: BCMD job Job: Styles Model: 612th officer Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Grendaes Other: Named character Lore: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Styles Job: (Battalion) Heavy Trooper Model: 612th Heavy Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Z6 Rotary Blaster, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Jet Trooper Model: 612th Jet Trooper Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Trooper Model: 612th Trooper Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s Job: (Battalion) Medic Model: 612th Medic Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Medkit, Grenades Job: (Battalion) Sharpshooter Model: 612th Sharpshooter Weapons: DC-15a, DC-15s, Republic Sniper, Grenades @Jayarr made all the models The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Nyon Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 Until I elaborate more I will just leave my opinion. -1 I can agree that the server is doing really well in terms of battalions getting members, but I don't think adding in a new one would necessarily be a good thing. I feel like if we add a battalion in Now, either it or another battalion will die, and I don't want to see that.
Posted February 26, 2018 Until I elaborate more I will just leave my opinion. -1 I can agree that the server is doing really well in terms of battalions getting members, but I don't think adding in a new one would necessarily be a good thing. I feel like if we add a battalion in Now, either it or another battalion will die, and I don't want to see that.
Ccmonty Posted February 26, 2018 Author Posted February 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Nyon said: Until I elaborate more I will just leave my opinion. -1 I can agree that the server is doing really well in terms of battalions getting members, but I don't think adding in a new one would necessarily be a good thing. I feel like if we add a battalion in Now, either it or another battalion will die, and I don't want to see that. thats fair but just keep in mind this will be in the next update most likely a big one it gives plenty of time for battalions to have gotten beefy numbers The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Nyon said: Until I elaborate more I will just leave my opinion. -1 I can agree that the server is doing really well in terms of battalions getting members, but I don't think adding in a new one would necessarily be a good thing. I feel like if we add a battalion in Now, either it or another battalion will die, and I don't want to see that. thats fair but just keep in mind this will be in the next update most likely a big one it gives plenty of time for battalions to have gotten beefy numbers The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Nyon Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, ccmonty said: thats fair but just keep in mind this will be in the next update most likely a big one it gives plenty of time for battalions to have gotten beefy numbers In response to that keep in mind that we have an everlooming 128 player limit and not everyone can fill a battalion if we keep adding them.
Posted February 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, ccmonty said: thats fair but just keep in mind this will be in the next update most likely a big one it gives plenty of time for battalions to have gotten beefy numbers In response to that keep in mind that we have an everlooming 128 player limit and not everyone can fill a battalion if we keep adding them.
Ccmonty Posted February 26, 2018 Author Posted February 26, 2018 Just now, Nyon said: In response to that keep in mind that we have an everlooming 128 player limit and not everyone can fill a battalion if we keep adding them. fair enough The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 26, 2018 Just now, Nyon said: In response to that keep in mind that we have an everlooming 128 player limit and not everyone can fill a battalion if we keep adding them. fair enough The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Hood Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1, we literally just removed 2 battalions, I see no point in adding another combat battalion, especially one that has near zero lore.
Posted February 26, 2018 -1, we literally just removed 2 battalions, I see no point in adding another combat battalion, especially one that has near zero lore.
CBlake Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 Neutral. But. I will give my opinion as a tester. personal opinion: it's really an unneeded battalion Pros: another choice for CTs and other members looking for something new Cons: we just got rid of 2 battalions so adding this one probably wouldn't help anything As it is already hard enough to fill battalions. You would just make it harder for that to happen. Thanks BCMD Cody Zim's Dev Tester 1 Current: 2ndACS REGA CPT CC-3426 "CBlake" Former: 212th Battalion Commander Cody | Synergy Roleplay Model Developer
Posted February 26, 2018 Neutral. But. I will give my opinion as a tester. personal opinion: it's really an unneeded battalion Pros: another choice for CTs and other members looking for something new Cons: we just got rid of 2 battalions so adding this one probably wouldn't help anything As it is already hard enough to fill battalions. You would just make it harder for that to happen. Thanks BCMD Cody Zim's Dev Tester 1 Current: 2ndACS REGA CPT CC-3426 "CBlake" Former: 212th Battalion Commander Cody | Synergy Roleplay Model Developer
Esitt Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 I'm going to stay NEUTRAL until further feedback goes on. What Hood said is correct, we just removed 2 heavy lore battalions. There is really no point to have any more for now until the new map comes out. But I like the idea of a new attack battalion. Give us Kamino Security Team, lmao. 2
Posted February 26, 2018 I'm going to stay NEUTRAL until further feedback goes on. What Hood said is correct, we just removed 2 heavy lore battalions. There is really no point to have any more for now until the new map comes out. But I like the idea of a new attack battalion. Give us Kamino Security Team, lmao. 2
Ccmonty Posted February 26, 2018 Author Posted February 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, Styles12 said: -1 I'm styles. nah fam this styles came first The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, Styles12 said: -1 I'm styles. nah fam this styles came first The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Ccmonty Posted February 26, 2018 Author Posted February 26, 2018 i can understand the -1 here with 2 battalions just removed this might come at a bad time. should this still not have any +1 tommarow i will ask this be denied and post it again at a later time 1 1 The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 26, 2018 i can understand the -1 here with 2 battalions just removed this might come at a bad time. should this still not have any +1 tommarow i will ask this be denied and post it again at a later time 1 1 The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Alexz Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1 I would hate to see more batts die due to this. I don't believe we have room for this anymore.
Posted February 26, 2018 -1 I would hate to see more batts die due to this. I don't believe we have room for this anymore.
Chambers Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1 From me. Not enough lore and that amount of grenades just give me a bad feeling
Posted February 26, 2018 -1 From me. Not enough lore and that amount of grenades just give me a bad feeling
Tyzen Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 I mean if we were gonna add in those models i would rather it just be 612th -1 2
Posted February 26, 2018 I mean if we were gonna add in those models i would rather it just be 612th -1 2
Banjans Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1 Would rather have 327th or 91st back instead of a battalion with less lore.
Posted February 26, 2018 -1 Would rather have 327th or 91st back instead of a battalion with less lore.
Duck Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 (edited) -1 When I suggested ARF it was due to the potential arf could have, however this battalion has almost no lore, and no potential. So what It would specialize in, what it would get, are big problems with this suggestions. As it stands even the 91st Had more usefulness on the server, and 91st could only use their speeders on event server. Edited February 26, 2018 by Duck
Posted February 26, 2018 (edited) -1 When I suggested ARF it was due to the potential arf could have, however this battalion has almost no lore, and no potential. So what It would specialize in, what it would get, are big problems with this suggestions. As it stands even the 91st Had more usefulness on the server, and 91st could only use their speeders on event server. Edited February 26, 2018 by Duck
Core Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1 I don't want another possible battalion to die BTW this is 612th
Duck Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Core said: -1 I don't want another possible battalion to die BTW this is 612th This isnt 612th, 612th was led by " Commander CC-4572, "Ganch" Edited February 26, 2018 by Duck
Posted February 26, 2018 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Core said: -1 I don't want another possible battalion to die BTW this is 612th This isnt 612th, 612th was led by " Commander CC-4572, "Ganch" Edited February 26, 2018 by Duck
Jayarr Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 Why did you use my 612th for this, a majority of people you suggested aren't even 612th, let a lone in that pack.
Posted February 26, 2018 Why did you use my 612th for this, a majority of people you suggested aren't even 612th, let a lone in that pack.
Washington Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 -1 Didn't we just gun down two innocent lads? THis server doesn't need to see more batts killed. Maybe one day 1
Posted February 26, 2018 -1 Didn't we just gun down two innocent lads? THis server doesn't need to see more batts killed. Maybe one day 1
Founder Xaze Posted February 27, 2018 Founder Founder Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) I feel since we just removed 2 battalions we shouldn't just add two back. They'll be dead. Edited February 27, 2018 by Xaze 1
Founder Founder Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) I feel since we just removed 2 battalions we shouldn't just add two back. They'll be dead. Edited February 27, 2018 by Xaze 1
Ccmonty Posted February 27, 2018 Author Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) Due to overwhelming negative feedback o would ask this be closed and denied I will suggest something else probrobly 612 Edited February 27, 2018 by ccmonty The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) Due to overwhelming negative feedback o would ask this be closed and denied I will suggest something else probrobly 612 Edited February 27, 2018 by ccmonty The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Ccmonty Posted February 27, 2018 Author Posted February 27, 2018 ok i would like to ask this post be denied as it has recived a EXTREME amount of negitive feedback. i will suggest something else instead The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted February 27, 2018 ok i would like to ask this post be denied as it has recived a EXTREME amount of negitive feedback. i will suggest something else instead The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Retired Founder Zim Posted February 27, 2018 Retired Founder Posted February 27, 2018 ᴛᴏ ᴍᴜᴄʜ ɴᴇɢᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ ғᴇᴇᴅʙᴀᴄᴋ. ᴅᴇɴɪᴇᴅ. 1
Recommended Posts