Leaderboard

Old man here to add my 2 cents. Yes, there has been bias in HC in the past. I'm sorry Conrad, but you were definitely the Golden Child back in the day. But that was the past not now. Granted I tend to stay away from the Drama of the server. To answer your question, I know the Directors and HC always look to improving and keeping the server alive. I've been on the back end of being rejected for a waive or losing a position to another player who they thought would be a better pick, and they were right. (Okay @Ratioyou can dumb me now)

sighs in about to lose a lot of forum rep Did you all forget that this is just a videogame? Or do you all have nothing better to do with your lives? This whole voting process has turned Synergy into a war zone. Factions of people fighting against factions of others. People who would -1 the other app JUST because they want to see the other as BCMD, not based on the merits of the actual application. This is so sad to see. We're all here pretending we're Star Wars characters on an outdated videogame. I promise NONE of it is that deep. You want to know the truth? You're right. We have very little choice in a lot of these matters. So what? As much as I hate legacy picks, it's over. They made it to interview. Truthfully, if we ran solely on majority vote, the server would die in a month. Similarly, if 241st wasn't in such a BAD position on the server, Bana never would have applied. Honestly, Conrad, I don't know what happened. You used to be a chill dude. Now all I see from you are posts that cause more drama. Why would you even make this? Are you, as a former Chancellor, one to talk about favoritism by the server leadership? If you had cared so much for 241st, you never would have left. You rank skipped a LT-MAJ minutes before you left JUST so he could apply. Over your whole term, did you not consider your replacement? Now that you've left, and things MIGHT not go your way after, you think to come here and spark even MORE drama? Who do you think yourself to be? Do you think you're the hero of Synergy by driving a wedge between all of these players? Also, you have NO room to talk about favoritism. I personally have caught and clipped you doing heavy ERP with event jobs on the server. We would have banned a new player for this. You didn't even get a scratch. You're very quick to call out favoritism by leadership when you yourself have gotten away with bannable offenses in the last month. All of Synergy needs to see this for what it is. This is a videogame. There is NO reason we should have this sort of drama so actively pushed by our server legacy members, and there is no reason we should let it change our moods while playing this game. Shame on every esteemed Synergy individual who pressed this drama. Get back to playing the game. If you don't like it, get off.

You were given major (effective BCMD) in 241st for free lmao

This is sooooo cringe bro you guys were so unhappy that a guy you don't love didn't get denied at the application stage that you banded together to make a post and show off how tough you and your posse is The nature of this post is in no way the way you are trying to show it to be. This isn't a rule clarification genuine post where you are genuinely curious on the criteria for clarification purposes this is a "Why didn't Bana get denied" post where you express your frustration that things aren't going your way and search for a rule that can be counted as broken so that it does go your way. While the waive rules being broken are fair to call out, to be completly honest with you its 100% nitpicking. You hunted down any possible rule he could've broken then launched it onto with a snide and cheeky grin on your face as a gotcha moment. Personally speaking, I feel as though his qualifications and past experience proving that he is more than capable of the duties entailed by a BCMD should negate the need for him to be a WO or higher as it is realistic to assume that he'd be experienced with duties that are expected of a WO or higher but I digress. You found that rule so you could try and get him and for no other reason. This guy gets it. Conrad you are probably one of the people who has benefited from favoritism the most and its crazy to be calling it out. Pot calling the kettle black type shit Next time you wanna have a battalion run good put some thought into who will come after you instead of just one-man-showing it and being upset when it doesn't go to your master plan or whatever

Question: What is the criteria to pass to a interview for a BCMD position? Comments/Concerns: A recent commander app was moved to interview, despite having more -1's then +1's. This is very concerning as a player as how am i supposed to take this as anything other then blatant favoritism on the side of the director team? Do our votes even matter? Do our voices matter? Staff Member you're asking: @Moose_Wundo@Danny@blazin Additional info:

You do Realize Klein still had to get waived correct? He was not MAJ long enough to straight up apply, also the issue is there is clearly stated rules that Directors put in place to make sure people are WO+ for minimum 4 straight weeks in the battalion before they can go for a waive and they let Bana waive 2 ranks early that is why people are upset lol. Hope The facts help clear your mind

212th didn't exactly want him to get an interview either...

bless up i entirely forgot about this change. real talk tho why we letting bana through, like what makes him the exception? I wont deny he's done some good stuff but if this rule is in place to why would we bypass it for him

I actually appreciate this reply, even if it looks bad that’s it’s still a HC member defending potential HC bias. Clorox is probably the most trusted person within HC atm. can you give some examples of individuals that have made it to interview with more -1s than +1s tho?

the best BCMDs are the ones the battalion never wanted. It's like dads with dogs they said no to getting but they got them anyway

Guys why cant we just hug it out

scorboard