Leaderboard
.thumb.gif.a97f28de0233f5643714a3f266c22381.gif)
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/15/2023 in Posts
-
+1, Honestly, in no way will this suggestion even effect me as a 104th member. If the battalion wants it, and I have no reason to care, why not +1... I mean, surely if it's a dumb idea as everyone says the founders will just... not implement it. Anyways, good luck1 point
-
+1 good idea1 point
-
+1 212th had done well with it. Other units and regiments had their standards raised and upheld due to having a better role model. Plus it helped with joint-unit trainings, increasing coordination and planning between our subunits and regiments, and made us feel more professional and cohesive when in events.1 point
-
this post is very funny to watch and I genuinely don't know which side has more people chiming in when their opinion doesn't matter ig -1 I really don't think 212th having more stuff matters in the long run but I just like seeing Finn get mad1 point
-
You are correct, Rizzo and I are not on the same page about this. However I HAVE spoken to SOBDE members that ARE on board with Foxtrot returning, and have offered help in creating dupes and helping with tryouts to ensure that the standards for an RC unit are met.1 point
-
-1 You guys don't need a 3rd sub unit. GM didn't get to keep Devil Dogs when SO was added back. Also plugging a server suggestion in TS is cringe and I also don't think its allowed-1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00