CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 (edited) Name: SO ARC 2ndLT Angel Suggestion: Allow the SO Flame Troopers to use the EVO suit. Flame Troopers will be a Jobless group within SO and managed within. No server space will be taken up by this. Implementation: Allow SO Flame Troopers to use the EVO/Snowsuit. (This only allows us to use a bodygrouper) Lore: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ioXlHTgfqFa9s80jh7KW-jF7SHgmmuYNaS9XRF3K53k/edit?usp=sharing Workshop content if applicable: N/A (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Edited July 16, 2018 by CruorFlumine further explaination Link to comment
Nade Jones Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 From a Gamemaster perspective flamethrowers ruin events so as much I want to see this, it won't really work. -1 1 4 Report Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander Link to comment
Life- Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1 Flame throwers are so fucking annoying and it will ruin events as nade said 1 minute ago, Nade Jones said: From a Gamemaster perspective flamethrowers ruin events so as much I want to see this, it won't really work. -1 ^ 2 Report Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Nade Jones said: From a Gamemaster perspective flamethrowers ruin events so as much I want to see this, it won't really work. -1 It...Wouldnt affect events? How would allowing people who purchased a flamethrower to wear a snowsuit like in lore ruin more events? 1 Report Link to comment
Life- Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Just now, CruorFlumine said: It...Wouldnt affect events? How would allowing people who purchased a flamethrower to wear a snowsuit like in lore ruin more events? The flames are all over your screen and you cant see shit as a event job. Link to comment
Metro Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1 "We'll get it done, Colonel. Six out." Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Then remove flamethrowers from the store? 1 2 Report Link to comment
Dream Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 As a proud supporter of the snowsuit community; +1 1 Report Link to comment
BigZach Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 minute ago, CruorFlumine said: It...Wouldnt affect events? How would allowing people who purchased a flamethrower to wear a snowsuit like in lore ruin more events? Explain your idea properly in the actual starting post. Also you dont need to go through the forums for a sub unit that is jobless. You can just ask the directors. "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic Link to comment
Life- Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 minute ago, CruorFlumine said: Then remove flamethrowers from the store? Doesn't change the fact that they will still have a flame thrower and it will ruin the fun for everyone in events lol. 2 Report Link to comment
Hero Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Ok i think i see what u mean, it’s so if they have a flame thrower they are allowed to use their snow suit and not get beaned for it. Also guys flamethrowers have been in events and if u have enough money to buy it then u have it why would we restrict access... +1 easy to do and i mean they aren’t getting free flamethrowers so its not gonna be a lot of people 2 Report Link to comment
Life- Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 (edited) Flame throwers get fire all over you screen Edited July 16, 2018 by Joshua 3 Report Link to comment
Scribbles Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 (edited) I dont see why not, its just letting them use a cosmetic to make the flames more immersive. I can understand why people dislike the flamethrower, hence why they're so expensive. Yes they may ruin events because of the fire spam but for those who have it i dont see why they wouldnt be allowed to wear the suit as they wore it in lore when using said flamethrowers. +1 Tl;dr its literally just a cosmetic for the SO for a more immersive experience, and it would show event jobs what people to stay away from during events if they dont like flamethrowers. Edited July 16, 2018 by Scribbles Link to comment
BigZach Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Why does this have to be SO specific? Anyone with a flame thrower should be able to use the snow suit. 1 Report "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Then we allow everyone, the reason I put it up for SO is due to the specific mention of SO and the flames troopers under Commadner jets command. If anyone with a flamethrower wants to use a snowsuit, then im cool with that. The more the merrier really Link to comment
Nade Jones Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 I see what this suggestion is now, from my understanding there is no-one in SO who even has a flamethrower? Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 I do and there are multiple people saving up. I suppose it would make more sense to allow anyone with a flamethrower to use it as well Link to comment
Jacien Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 A few things at the start, they aren't giving anyone flamethrowers, snowsuits are not the equivalent for blaze armor but look similar, this doesn't obstruct anything. This is literally a bodygroup that people who use flamethrowers to use that they already have. I do not see the harm in this whatsoever. In fact I don't see the harm in other battalions using this who have the bodygroup to be able to swap to the snowsuit. Angel is already doing this and it hasn't bothered anyone to my knowledge. Even though I hate the flamethrower on the server and in S.A.M. +1 Why the fuck not? Link to comment
Mike Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 Why are people getting so mad this is asking to use a body grouper lolwut +1 1 Report Link to comment
Zyner Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 I'm just wondering, out of all things why did SO pick Flame Troopers as a sub-group/makeshift job? And this also seems a bit like a loophole to the one-whitelist system. Regularly you'd be your normal job, say Medic, but then swap to EVO suit and now you're a Flame Trooper yet still have the Medic loadout. To be honest... I don't think this even needs to be suggested. You could of just done it, really. If anyone questions it you could say you're wearing an EVO suit cause you're a Flame Trooper - the suggestion just seems a bit extra unless you're looking for a certified reason as to why you're wearing the snow/EVO suit when on-ship, etc. if people claim FailRP. Link to comment
CruorFlumine Posted July 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Zyner said: I'm just wondering, out of all things why did SO pick Flame Troopers as a sub-group/makeshift job? And this also seems a bit like a loophole to the one-whitelist system. Regularly you'd be your normal job, say Medic, but then swap to EVO suit and now you're a Flame Trooper yet still have the Medic loadout. To be honest... I don't think this even needs to be suggested. You could of just done it, really. If anyone questions it you could say you're wearing an EVO suit cause you're a Flame Trooper - the suggestion just seems a bit extra unless you're looking for a certified reason as to why you're wearing the snow/EVO suit when on-ship, etc. if people claim FailRP. Was planning on that to begin with, but I was told that I would need to make a suggestion for it. Link to comment
Arroyo Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, Zyner said: I'm just wondering, out of all things why did SO pick Flame Troopers as a sub-group/makeshift job? And this also seems a bit like a loophole to the one-whitelist system. Regularly you'd be your normal job, say Medic, but then swap to EVO suit and now you're a Flame Trooper yet still have the Medic loadout. To be honest... I don't think this even needs to be suggested. You could of just done it, really. If anyone questions it you could say you're wearing an EVO suit cause you're a Flame Trooper - the suggestion just seems a bit extra unless you're looking for a certified reason as to why you're wearing the snow/EVO suit when on-ship, etc. if people claim FailRP. -1 Link to comment
Pxnda Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1, i'm pretty sure SO is supposed to be a stealth battalion anyways and having flame troopers literally makes it seem like an attack. Current: Rancor Panda | Honorary Consular Ex: Delta 38, Kom'rk Skirata x2, Mereel Skirata, A'den Skirata, Omega Squad Fi (XO), Foxtrot MDMK, 327th 1stLT, 501st 1stLT, 212th MAJ, 41st WO, Alpha ARC 22 WO 'Aven', 212th 1stLT Lycanthrope Link to comment
Korm Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 All battalions are getting new Bodygroupers with the model updates, and no one will have the hazmat suit. Link to comment
Hero Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Joshua said: Flame throwers are still cancer and can ruin a event if you are holding down a area. Well don’t -1 the whole thing just because it has a flame thrower in it. It’s server wide and open to anyone who can afford it. This whole topic is off wether or not they can use the snowsuit as a cosmetic. if everyone who has a snow suit would be allowed to use it if they own a flame thrower that would be dope Link to comment
J.Jefferson Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 (edited) -1 You should of asked for SO scuba troopers Edited July 16, 2018 by J.Jefferson 1 Report Former Positions: 41st XO 41st Green Leader 41st Faie Temple Guard Manager/Cin Overseer Gamemaster Link to comment
Grief Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1 ICEFUSE: SHOCK XO/BCMD Thorn | 327th XO SYNERGY: 41ST CMD/ARCL/GCL x3 | Former BCMD Gree Link to comment
Chambers Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1 Flamethrowers gave me cancer Link to comment
MsNecro Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 +1 Its nothing more than letting SO use a snowsuit if they are using a flamethrower. We still need to save up 15 Million/20 Million. Link to comment
Korm Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 4 hours ago, Korm said: All battalions are getting new Bodygroupers with the model updates, and no one will have the hazmat suit. 47 minutes ago, Ms Fox said: +1 Its nothing more than letting SO use a snowsuit if they are using a flamethrower. We still need to save up 15 Million/20 Million. 1 Report Link to comment
BadDog Posted July 16, 2018 Report Share Posted July 16, 2018 -1 Spoiler 2ndAC Parjai-4 WO BadDog Former: Head Admin |TCO Commander Kix | Mechanized Regimental Commander | Obi Wan Kenobi | Battalion Commander Cody | Wolfpack Commander Comet |104th Jedi Master Plo Koon |TRD |GMD | Overseer | 2ndAC Commander Barlex | SO Major | DU Commander |Waxer | Foxtrot | Adi Gallia | Quinlan Vos | Skywalker | Consular leader | Shadow leader | Guardian Leader | Gray Jedi Master | Commodore | Wilhuff tarkin Link to comment
Founder Square Posted July 17, 2018 Founder Founder Report Share Posted July 17, 2018 Non job sub units do not need to go through server suggestions. You can come talk to either myself or Freck about it in TS when you have the chance. This suggestion is being moved to denied. Link to comment
Recommended Posts