BlackiSblack Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) I have decided to void this suggestion due to overwelming -1s as i stated if majority of ppl dont want this ill remove the suggestion. I didnt reallyt expect it to get alot of plus ones just generally wanted everyones opinion the subject. Thank you for leaving your opinions and comments! Sorry as well if this may have offended you Sock knowing your a long lasting officer in cts. Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1
Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) I have decided to void this suggestion due to overwelming -1s as i stated if majority of ppl dont want this ill remove the suggestion. I didnt reallyt expect it to get alot of plus ones just generally wanted everyones opinion the subject. Thank you for leaving your opinions and comments! Sorry as well if this may have offended you Sock knowing your a long lasting officer in cts. Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1
Peace Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 If we added 101st, they would have to remove a current. Idk how it would work out but +1 1
Posted March 3, 2019 If we added 101st, they would have to remove a current. Idk how it would work out but +1 1
Jayarr Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) +1 I've always loved 101st and CT, I used to be an XO for it on icefuse. It would only be bad because of the people leading it. I doubt any jobs need to be removed for this one. Edited March 3, 2019 by Jayarr 1 2
Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) +1 I've always loved 101st and CT, I used to be an XO for it on icefuse. It would only be bad because of the people leading it. I doubt any jobs need to be removed for this one. Edited March 3, 2019 by Jayarr 1 2
Alexz Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. 1
Posted March 3, 2019 -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. 1
BlackiSblack Posted March 3, 2019 Author Posted March 3, 2019 Just now, Alexz said: -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. I dont t hink a battalion needs to get removed for a CT Battalion I think Joah meant like 187th or 38th or some other battalion if you can confirm @Joah
Author Posted March 3, 2019 Just now, Alexz said: -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. I dont t hink a battalion needs to get removed for a CT Battalion I think Joah meant like 187th or 38th or some other battalion if you can confirm @Joah
Arroyo Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 Ima be the first to say it just because. But first Neutral Sock will probs be 101st BCMD 1
Posted March 3, 2019 Ima be the first to say it just because. But first Neutral Sock will probs be 101st BCMD 1
SmallJeff Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) +1 i guess but 4 minutes ago, Alexz said: -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. Like we had it when the server started after a cc got trained they went right into the 101st as a pvt and they could stay there but get promoted we dont need to remove anything just change ct to 101st again Edited March 3, 2019 by SmallJeff 2
Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) +1 i guess but 4 minutes ago, Alexz said: -1 until you bring up what battalion you want removed to have them replaced with. Like we had it when the server started after a cc got trained they went right into the 101st as a pvt and they could stay there but get promoted we dont need to remove anything just change ct to 101st again Edited March 3, 2019 by SmallJeff 2
Alexz Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, BlackiSblack said: I dont t hink a battalion needs to get removed for a CT Battalion I think Joah meant like 187th or 38th or some other battalion if you can confirm @Joah yeah no, if you gonna request a whole new path and new classes with new leadership and a place where other battalions could lose numbers then you will definitely need someone removed. No matter the reasoning, this will hurt other battalions because they will get less recruits. The 1 for 1 rule still stands in this case. 1 3
Posted March 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, BlackiSblack said: I dont t hink a battalion needs to get removed for a CT Battalion I think Joah meant like 187th or 38th or some other battalion if you can confirm @Joah yeah no, if you gonna request a whole new path and new classes with new leadership and a place where other battalions could lose numbers then you will definitely need someone removed. No matter the reasoning, this will hurt other battalions because they will get less recruits. The 1 for 1 rule still stands in this case. 1 3
Alexz Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 1 minute ago, SmallJeff said: +1 i guess but Like we had it when the server started after a cc got trained they went right into the 101st as a pvt and they could stay there but get promoted right I was there and it was the path I took. We eventually removed them because it didn't work too well in the long run. it was still a battalion and still has an equal place to have a battalion removed. 1
Posted March 3, 2019 1 minute ago, SmallJeff said: +1 i guess but Like we had it when the server started after a cc got trained they went right into the 101st as a pvt and they could stay there but get promoted right I was there and it was the path I took. We eventually removed them because it didn't work too well in the long run. it was still a battalion and still has an equal place to have a battalion removed. 1
BlackiSblack Posted March 3, 2019 Author Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Alexz said: yeah no, if you gonna request a whole new path and new classes with new leadership and a place where other battalions could lose numbers then you will definitely need someone removed. No matter the reasoning, this will hurt other battalions because they will get less recruits. The 1 for 1 rule still stands in this case. Dude this is a battalion were new and old people can chill and move to other battalions only dedicated ppl that would stay probably be the senior officers like Sock and others who decide to return. This wont kill any battalion, legit CCs ARE MANDATED TO join the CT Battalion lmao if you say ur battalion is dead cause of that. Thats your recruitment issue. Because not all CTs want to stay in 101st or whatever we decide or bcmd decides to call it Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1
Author Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Alexz said: yeah no, if you gonna request a whole new path and new classes with new leadership and a place where other battalions could lose numbers then you will definitely need someone removed. No matter the reasoning, this will hurt other battalions because they will get less recruits. The 1 for 1 rule still stands in this case. Dude this is a battalion were new and old people can chill and move to other battalions only dedicated ppl that would stay probably be the senior officers like Sock and others who decide to return. This wont kill any battalion, legit CCs ARE MANDATED TO join the CT Battalion lmao if you say ur battalion is dead cause of that. Thats your recruitment issue. Because not all CTs want to stay in 101st or whatever we decide or bcmd decides to call it Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1
Alexz Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 1 minute ago, BlackiSblack said: Dude this is a battalion were new and old people can chill and move to other battalions only dedicated ppl that would stay probably be the senior officers like Sock and others who decide to return. This wont kill any battalion, legit CCs ARE MANDATED TO join the CT Battalion lmao if you say ur battalion is dead cause of that. Thats your recruitment issue. Because not all CTs want to stay in 101st or whatever we decide or bcmd decides to call it -1 then 1
Posted March 3, 2019 1 minute ago, BlackiSblack said: Dude this is a battalion were new and old people can chill and move to other battalions only dedicated ppl that would stay probably be the senior officers like Sock and others who decide to return. This wont kill any battalion, legit CCs ARE MANDATED TO join the CT Battalion lmao if you say ur battalion is dead cause of that. Thats your recruitment issue. Because not all CTs want to stay in 101st or whatever we decide or bcmd decides to call it -1 then 1
Itachi Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 i was going to make a suggestion about this relating to them self promoting and if you are a PVT then you get a PVT job and the jobs go up with ranks. so if that is in the server then i +1
Posted March 3, 2019 i was going to make a suggestion about this relating to them self promoting and if you are a PVT then you get a PVT job and the jobs go up with ranks. so if that is in the server then i +1
Sock Monkey Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. 8 1 :)
Posted March 3, 2019 Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. 8 1 :)
Jorrdan Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) I like the idea. I was a ct and it was cool. Gives people stuff to do as CTs like CTs getting deployed and shit some times +1 Edited March 3, 2019 by Jorrdan
Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) I like the idea. I was a ct and it was cool. Gives people stuff to do as CTs like CTs getting deployed and shit some times +1 Edited March 3, 2019 by Jorrdan
Bazoo Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 -1 back on icefuse/start of synergy this was a thing and it failed really bad, so I dont see any reason why it would work now. The reason it failed is because no one wanted to join it to train new CT just to lose them to another batt. The purpose of this batt is pretty much to kill its own battalion wich isnt the best thing. 2
Posted March 3, 2019 -1 back on icefuse/start of synergy this was a thing and it failed really bad, so I dont see any reason why it would work now. The reason it failed is because no one wanted to join it to train new CT just to lose them to another batt. The purpose of this batt is pretty much to kill its own battalion wich isnt the best thing. 2
BlackiSblack Posted March 3, 2019 Author Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Sock Monkey said: Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. No one said you have to apply or take responsibility of the position you could just maintain your position as a Captain If needed Ill remove the post if this gets to much flak as in -1s which is majority of people who dont want this added. Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1 1
Author Posted March 3, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Sock Monkey said: Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. No one said you have to apply or take responsibility of the position you could just maintain your position as a Captain If needed Ill remove the post if this gets to much flak as in -1s which is majority of people who dont want this added. Edited March 3, 2019 by BlackiSblack 1 1
Stockings Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 -1 I used to want this a while ago, but as Sock said, CT's should sometimes get promoted for their extensive work in the CT's. Sock used to be a colonel and certainly deserves a higher rank than that alone. It's not necessary and doesn't work well on the server as it was attempted before. People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719
Posted March 3, 2019 -1 I used to want this a while ago, but as Sock said, CT's should sometimes get promoted for their extensive work in the CT's. Sock used to be a colonel and certainly deserves a higher rank than that alone. It's not necessary and doesn't work well on the server as it was attempted before. People Who Put Their Former Ranks In Their Signature Are Idiots! Community Liaison - Discord Boo Radley#2719
Mike Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 -1 I dont think I need to explain why the fluorine drinkers should not be a battalion 1
Posted March 3, 2019 -1 I dont think I need to explain why the fluorine drinkers should not be a battalion 1
Baxter Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 Again, not a great idea. For pretty much the same reasons I -1'd the 187th suggestion. -1 1
Posted March 3, 2019 Again, not a great idea. For pretty much the same reasons I -1'd the 187th suggestion. -1 1
Logic Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 -1 Sure itd be a big meme, but battalions need CTs to join them 2 I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
Posted March 3, 2019 -1 Sure itd be a big meme, but battalions need CTs to join them 2 I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
SR_Kangaroo Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 1 hour ago, IKE said: @Sock Monkey THIS IS YOUR TIME Nah Fam, @Sock Monkey gonna scream and run away lol I'm going to stay neutral unless you guys have a full general idea on how you are gonna take command of the ct's, you also need to take the consideration of what 38 minutes ago, 41st Logic said: battalions need CTs to join them said.
Posted March 3, 2019 1 hour ago, IKE said: @Sock Monkey THIS IS YOUR TIME Nah Fam, @Sock Monkey gonna scream and run away lol I'm going to stay neutral unless you guys have a full general idea on how you are gonna take command of the ct's, you also need to take the consideration of what 38 minutes ago, 41st Logic said: battalions need CTs to join them said.
COC4IN3 Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Sock Monkey said: Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. The true CT king. ❤️
Posted March 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Sock Monkey said: Sorry Guys, I dont want this at all, I am all for Generals continuing to promote CTs. but I dont want medics, snipers and shit in CTs, thats not its purpose. If I wanted it, you should have let me make a post anyways -.- -1. The true CT king. ❤️
Esitt Posted March 3, 2019 Posted March 3, 2019 Voided as per request of the author //Locked //Moved to Server Suggestions - Denied
Posted March 3, 2019 Voided as per request of the author //Locked //Moved to Server Suggestions - Denied
Recommended Posts