Logic Posted January 20, 2019 Report Share Posted January 20, 2019 (edited) Name: Logic Suggestion: Adding an Officer tag to teamspeak Where would this be implemented?: ...teamspeak? How would this benefit the TeamSpeak/Community?: It would lessen the load on Staff and BCMDs because it should be able to take and give battalion tags and move people for sits. Have you asked for Feedback from others about this suggestion?: A couple people in the channel when I said “we should have an officer tag” Briefly explain why this should be implemented?: we have a pretty useless NCO tag, the officer tag would have permissions such as taking tags, moving people and giving tags, that way people don’t search for staff or bcmds to handle tags. Edited January 23, 2019 by [SR]Logic[SA] I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot. Link to comment
Arroyo Posted January 20, 2019 Report Share Posted January 20, 2019 I don’t know it was a pretty big issue cause of a person but MRP has it ( how do I know, cause I have the MRP Officer tag lol) Maybe add rules so a Senior Officer+ get it +1 Link to comment
Chop Posted January 20, 2019 Report Share Posted January 20, 2019 It used to be a thing and from what I can remember it worked well +1 Not a Medal of Valour recipient Link to comment
Buuged Posted January 20, 2019 Report Share Posted January 20, 2019 +1 21st's most useless long term member why my shit keep getting deleted Link to comment
Blueberry Juice Posted January 20, 2019 Report Share Posted January 20, 2019 +1 or at the very least give NCO's the ability to pull people for tryouts or something like that. Link to comment
Carvis Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked. Link to comment
Logic Posted January 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2019 On 1/22/2019 at 11:25 AM, Carvis said: People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked. CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot. Link to comment
Carvis Posted January 23, 2019 Report Share Posted January 23, 2019 1 hour ago, [SR]Logic[SA] said: CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed No? they can give way more than that. Link to comment
Mexeno Posted January 31, 2019 Report Share Posted January 31, 2019 +1 Reasons stated above Link to comment
Retired Founder Ron Posted February 7, 2019 Retired Founder Report Share Posted February 7, 2019 @Carter @Heart Is this really needed? Link to comment
Fizzik Posted February 7, 2019 Report Share Posted February 7, 2019 34 minutes ago, Ron said: @Carter @Heart Is this really needed? I say it is so their vote is not needed 3 Report Rule-maker and rule-breaker. Link to comment
Heart Posted February 7, 2019 Report Share Posted February 7, 2019 @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. 1 Report Link to comment
Retired Founder Ron Posted February 7, 2019 Retired Founder Report Share Posted February 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Heart said: @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. It can already do this, and always has been able to; which is why I found this kind of pointless. Denied 1 Report Link to comment
Recommended Posts