Logic Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 (edited) Name: Logic Suggestion: Adding an Officer tag to teamspeak Where would this be implemented?: ...teamspeak? How would this benefit the TeamSpeak/Community?: It would lessen the load on Staff and BCMDs because it should be able to take and give battalion tags and move people for sits. Have you asked for Feedback from others about this suggestion?: A couple people in the channel when I said “we should have an officer tag” Briefly explain why this should be implemented?: we have a pretty useless NCO tag, the officer tag would have permissions such as taking tags, moving people and giving tags, that way people don’t search for staff or bcmds to handle tags. Edited January 23, 2019 by [SR]Logic[SA] I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
Posted January 20, 2019 (edited) Name: Logic Suggestion: Adding an Officer tag to teamspeak Where would this be implemented?: ...teamspeak? How would this benefit the TeamSpeak/Community?: It would lessen the load on Staff and BCMDs because it should be able to take and give battalion tags and move people for sits. Have you asked for Feedback from others about this suggestion?: A couple people in the channel when I said “we should have an officer tag” Briefly explain why this should be implemented?: we have a pretty useless NCO tag, the officer tag would have permissions such as taking tags, moving people and giving tags, that way people don’t search for staff or bcmds to handle tags. Edited January 23, 2019 by [SR]Logic[SA] I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
Arroyo Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 I don’t know it was a pretty big issue cause of a person but MRP has it ( how do I know, cause I have the MRP Officer tag lol) Maybe add rules so a Senior Officer+ get it +1
Posted January 20, 2019 I don’t know it was a pretty big issue cause of a person but MRP has it ( how do I know, cause I have the MRP Officer tag lol) Maybe add rules so a Senior Officer+ get it +1
Chop Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 It used to be a thing and from what I can remember it worked well +1 Not a Medal of Valour recipient
Posted January 20, 2019 It used to be a thing and from what I can remember it worked well +1 Not a Medal of Valour recipient
Buuged Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 +1 21st's most useless long term member why my shit keep getting deleted
Blueberry Juice Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 +1 or at the very least give NCO's the ability to pull people for tryouts or something like that.
Posted January 20, 2019 +1 or at the very least give NCO's the ability to pull people for tryouts or something like that.
Carvis Posted January 22, 2019 Posted January 22, 2019 People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked.
Posted January 22, 2019 People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked.
Logic Posted January 23, 2019 Author Posted January 23, 2019 On 1/22/2019 at 11:25 AM, Carvis said: People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked. CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
Author Posted January 23, 2019 On 1/22/2019 at 11:25 AM, Carvis said: People with NCO tag are able to give the proper tags needed if they are recruiting. With that being said however, People who have the NCO tag should have moving power over people with Member/Enlisted tags as well as being able to remove the same tags they are able to give. So i’m neutral on this, however perms definitely should be reworked. CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot.
Carvis Posted January 23, 2019 Posted January 23, 2019 1 hour ago, [SR]Logic[SA] said: CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed No? they can give way more than that.
Posted January 23, 2019 1 hour ago, [SR]Logic[SA] said: CWRP NCO tag can only give US and RUS tags is what I was informed No? they can give way more than that.
Retired Founder Ron Posted February 7, 2019 Retired Founder Posted February 7, 2019 @Carter @Heart Is this really needed?
Fizzik Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 34 minutes ago, Ron said: @Carter @Heart Is this really needed? I say it is so their vote is not needed 3 Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Posted February 7, 2019 34 minutes ago, Ron said: @Carter @Heart Is this really needed? I say it is so their vote is not needed 3 Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Heart Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. 1
Posted February 7, 2019 @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. 1
Retired Founder Ron Posted February 7, 2019 Retired Founder Posted February 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Heart said: @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. It can already do this, and always has been able to; which is why I found this kind of pointless. Denied 1
Retired Founder Posted February 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Heart said: @Ron We don't need this tag. Just allow the NCO/Battalion Trainer tag to give regiment tags. It can already do this, and always has been able to; which is why I found this kind of pointless. Denied 1
Recommended Posts