Carvis

Fairly certain this ban was from ban was from @ Joah since 1 week bans are kinda his specialty when he’s on the server. The decision would be up to him to revert if he so chooses.

+1

This would be pretty neat, and I believe it was implemented into MRP when that was a thing. My only concern comes to moderation... If someone is in a battalion that has no staff on and starts spamming the N word then staff members won't be able to see it. I'm not going to give feedback since I can't neutral but those are just my thoughts

Whitelist Abuse,NITRP | BB: Blur | appeal @ synergyroleplay.com | RDM, NITRP. Appeal @ Synergyrolepaly.com FailRP, Minge, Staff Disrespect, Disrespect, Insubordination, RDMx2, Metagaming, 4 Arrests, ER Those are all the bans you've recieved, not including the perma. -1

"Where Shaak Ti sits in the hierarchy of the GAR "she" is equal to a reg, but by power, responsibilities, and a very simple observation of title Shaak ti is not a reg." - Sanchez Keeping my -1.

Still holds the same RP rank as a Jedi General

If a BCMD needs the assistance of Shaak Ti, then Shaak Ti can get pulled into the battalion commander's channel. 1. Staff and RP ranks are two different things 2. Jedi Leadership already has channels (Yoda/Mace/High Council) 3. Shaak Ti is a Jedi General, which is the rank that other named masters have. We aren't going to give special treatment to someone because other people of the same rank will also want their own channel. -1

Name: Carvis Suggestion: Remove "Promotion Requests" Why should we implement this?: This is a section that just doesn't get used. If people know of a staff member that is doing a good job, they can fill out the staff feedback form or use the staff feedback section on the forums. How will this improve the Forums?: It would just cleanup a section of the forums that isn't used.

Unfortunately, I can see that this section would be filled with mass toxicity especially toward server staff and management+ Kinda sounds like an excuse to call someone out and not get punished tbh. If you want to rant, just take it to off topic... everyone else does anyway.

This would be a great addition to community information. @ silvers Do you have any recommendations of questions that can go onto a FAQ section if this is decided to be accepted?

I agree that 5 is fairly low- especially when people apply for positions and want to give people hearts and stuff like that. However, making reactions unlimited and making only 5 count toward rep would be too much work for something that can just be enforced by a daily reaction limit (similar to the auto lock suggestion that someone had put up in the past) I personally believe this would be a good adjustment: Users: 10 reactions daily Server Staff: 15 reactions daily Head Admin+: Unlimited Then people still have plenty of reactions to go around, and if anyone is caught farming from other people then it goes punished with warning points and revoked access to reactions.

Since TG is a branch of its own, it 100% should get its own channel. If TG are working on non RP related things (Arrests) then they can always just move to the Shock channel to help with Minge-Cons +1

-1 If you need bypass to battalion channels, get channel key

Question: Is there a way to minimize the Synergy Roleplay banner that links you to the forums, above the channel description section of Teamspeak? Comments/Concerns: I'm personally not a big fan of it, and just want to close it out Staff Member you're asking: @ Ron

-snip- After reading some people responses to this, I agree with the suggestion except the rocket launchers. I believe those should stay in the battalion arc load out.

+1

or... and hear me out dont necropost

-1

-1 Unfortunately, I think adding a battalion to the server is the opposite of what is needed at the moment, especially at the time of the year. Also, if it were to ever get implemented again, it wouldn’t be a part of SOBDE, it would most likely join Specialized or be its own regiment.

-1 Going off a few things here 1. Wasn't even banned a week ago 2. It seems like most (if not all) of high staff and Ex-High staff agree with the ban, based on forum reactions/responses 3. From what I saw, what Aaron did warranted a ban. Arguing with directors never end well, and Aaron definitely went out of hand on this one. People keep on saying that the director went out of hand on this one as well, and I disagree. Directors are in their place for a reason and are suppose to have a certain level of respect given to them. If someone decides to make the mistake of fighting with them then that's on them, not the director.

yeah it’s gonna be a -1 from me 1. didn’t talk about getting approval from 104th HC 2. Pretty sure there are two bodies of water on the map, both of which are fairly shallow and wouldn’t need scuba gear 3. (I DIDNT CHECK SO IM SORRY IF IM WRONG) But the model string you provided says “LS” which usually refers to lightning squad which makes me believe you requested a 91st model (again, could be wrong, not 100% sure) 4. It would turn into a dead regiment since underwater combat NEVER happens

+1 Always down for new event server maps

FailRP was recently added in the CC room under “Misc Rules” with a example given of jumping off floors. Also suggestion format was not followed.

I believe this video give my feedback perfectly.