Conrad

Honestly, remove the staff rank part of the name also. Isn't the whole point of the tags that they tell you positions of players on the server? Just rely on that to do its job and remove a TON of name clutter with this double wammy. +1

@Xaze what’s your opinion on this?

I think the rule change should be for High command to be able to grant lore positions for things under them in the hierarchy. As well as changing it so that BCMD/XO/CMD of a battalion or faction doing the same for lore characters in their group if needed. Now the only issue I have is "what about positions that are filled by someone else". Could someone feel insulted that someone got their position for the day? Could they be mad they wheren't consulted. For open positions it should definitly be more lax, but for filled positions these are things to watch out for.

Hopefully it gets accepted this time. I remember when these models dropped. We where so excited to look this good, and now 2 years later hopefully our dream can come true for someone else. +1

I was under the impression directors could already do this. Its not uncommon for big events such as last night for players to get permission to go on jobs they're usually not allowed on. For example in the jedi order i've been given permission to be anakin numerous times when I wasn't him by different yoda's, or during order 66 events directors/GMC giving permission to be characters so the big names where filled. So if anything I think this suggestion could become more expansive then its current state, and allow for more then just "with director permission", because to me it seems like they already have this power.

Ok i'm getting a ton of cool ideas. Different huds for different jobs/groups. Give clones a more classic FPS hud like in RC game, naval something else with a place for the new pop-ups, Jedi something from say the old jedi knights games. IDK if possible, but could be cool. +1

Thats in single player, making them mods on the server that you need to connect you could disable the ability to turn it off. Why its important to make sure that condition is explicit. That and off by default is important for me as well.

I am only ok with this if it is off by default and you can opt into using it by console command or perhaps something on the C menu. If those are possible this is a +1, if not its a -1.

I am only ok with this if it is off by default and you can opt into using it by console command or perhaps something on the C menu. If those are possible this is a +1, if not its a -1.

Name: Conrad RP Rank: Overseer Suggestion: Remove the new battalion structure defined here: Implementation: Go back to 3-3-3 battalion structure, remove the 4th regimental. Other: In the current state of the server we need less applicable positions of oversight, doing stuff like this bloats up the top level that we can't even fill properly. Reverting it will put one less position that will sit open.

@Mavelle All the good ones have left by this point. No one left. Not a single person who would look out for our community remains... Also imagine calling onderon a downgrade of anaxes kekew. I think a double main map rotation would be lit, but it's gotta be done right, just going back to anaxes and onderon every other week won't be it IMO.

+1

+1 i havnt been a game master in years. Never used this to have to build a dupe. But man have I heard every word you can imagine about it from @Mavelle Something needs to change about this, it’s that simple. I get why crashes are bad for player pop, but man it feels like crashes just as much before as after this was added.

+1 makes sense to update the LAAT to match the new map.

Question: What was this suggestion denied Comments/Concerns: These are ranks that were not implemented with the new system. We are just missing ranks we've had on the server for over a year now. This is worrying because now what happeneds when any group wants to change ranks. Before this system it could just be done by high command but it just feels like shit like this can be denied. Staff Member you're asking: @Jad Additional info:

This is more of a dev question then a HA+ Question @Jad is best bet to explain it.

+1 love this idea, the delay makes it basically useless if its an impact you can actually viably use it vs event jobs.

@Jayarr This you?

@Mavelle Changed it to high. Something needs to change. I demand the complete removal of g protect. @Jad the ball is in your court.

Bug Type (Server:): CWRP event server Severity level (Low - Medium - High): High Evidence (if you can): Join the event server Description of the bug: Jedi levels/lightsabers stuff isn't synced with main How can we recreate it: Join the event server @XazeFix

I kinda disagree. I"m not huge on people just hopping into our community to drop their own personal links all willy nilly like. Things like that can't just be allowed to get away or else we'll just get shit all over the place, however someone making a mistake thats a long time community member is a lot different then a new CT or a new form account dropping twitch links. Should their be a punishment, yes, should it be a perma, hell no.

Jad has looked into this issue many many times, and no fix has come out for it. I'm trying to look for an alternative to buff it up and make it worth buying. The issue being it just sometimes doesn't kill people in the aoe, and its pretty consistently not doing this. Just today we had one out and shot it and i killed all of 1 person that was in the aoe area of a total of 3. It just doesn't work half the time. In its current state its less consistent and effective then a rocket launcher. And i've i'm looking to spend this kind of money i'd like to spend it on something better then a base class weapon.

Name: Conrad RP Rank: Major/Overseer Suggestion: Increase kyber rifle spawn ammo from 5 to 10 Implementation: Increase the amount of ammo it spawns with Weapons: rw_sw_kyber_rifle (If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu)) Other: As one of the few people who can purchase this gun, and has used it semi regularly before the weapon resell for 100% went away the one of two thing keeping me from buying this gun is the amount of ammo that it spawns with. I'm no cheater and don't want to have to reset my character to get more ammo, but for the price tag 5 is simply not enough for a gun that only works half the time. @Brooklyn we fight the good fight here.

From what i've been told he advertised his twitch link. +1 if this is true its not like he was advertising another community that competes with ours and spookz is a good guy i trust him.

-1 i'd rather see all DB PTS's removed as a whole. Big time wasters.