Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/03/2025 in Posts

  1. Ngl I do prefer it for Wolfpack over Dire Squad. A cool idea would be if battalions got their snow suits back then 104th would utilize their EVO suits and everyone else had the normal snow suits. +1 Hope yall get it
    2 points
  2. Name: WPL badger | Comet RP Rank: CMD Suggestion: Giving BCMD Wolffe and Wolfpack their EVO Suits that they used in the clone wars Show Implementation: Giving Wolffe and all of Wolfpack their EVO Suits with their armor Markings Lore: They were using these Suits when trying to find Jedi Master Sifo-Dyas on the moon of Oba-Diah. Episode: "The Lost One" (Season 6, Episode 10) Workshop content if applicable: Requires Development (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following if not, leave it out. Add or Change: Add a extra player model for BCMD Wolffe and all of Wolfpack for their EVO suits (Any job modification requires all this information) Job: BCMD Wolffe and all of Wolfpack Slots: 8 Description: All of wolfpack and BCMD Wolffe need their EVO Suits with BodyGroupers Model: All of wolfpack and BCMD Wolffe (Provide the model string if on server Ex. models/synergy_roleplay/trooper.mdl (Get this from the Q menu) Weapons: N/A (If you want a modfication to a weapon/saber you must put the weapon string in the suggestion. Ex. tfa_e5 (Get this from the Q menu)) Other:
    1 point
  3. I could support this if you can Guarantee it
    1 point
  4. If 104th get the desert trooper helmet I will be removing @Juggernautas BCMD and replacing him as the new one
    1 point
  5. Don't be afraid to show it, You think I made this suggestion for others? Nah I need credits if I'm gonna buy the Kyber Rifle
    1 point
  6. +1 Good addition to heavy troopers IMO to make them a bit better beyond Z6 Lets a heavy act as a rally point with their flag and big ass gun to camp by said flag
    1 point
  7. Me like this idea me seen these models before somewhere. @Neins @ColdenTheGreat @Abel, not Cain @Allgerman
    1 point
  8. -1 Don't be greedy
    1 point
  9. As a practice, the development team tries to remain impartial throughout suggestion discourse to ensure that the community can engage without undue influence. However, given some of the more pointed feedback in this thread, I believe it is prudent to offer our perspectives, as other development team members have already done. I am not opposed to introducing new groups onto the server. I concur, in part, with your goal of novelty and creativity, and I applaud your initiative. However, given the development team’s finite resources, we will often prioritize projects that have the most impact on the most people on the server. Specific changes, especially for a select few, are set aside due to the development team’s constraints. Furthermore, you must be attentive to existing rules that govern how many subunits can exist per group. You must also be diligent in your consideration of your suggestion’s impact on the server – a responsibility the development team also bears. Concerning the suggestion discussion, I believe that passion has overwhelmed the typical cordial discourse. I can appreciate boisterous advocacy for one's suggestion, but our contributions should always be in good faith. As others have already mentioned, the development team is filled with volunteers. There are many demands for our time, and we aren’t able to attend to everyone’s wishes. Furthermore, we do not rebuke someone simply because they dissent – but passing judgment on the server as “stale” because some weren’t as receptive to your suggestion isn’t fair to us, nor does it acknowledge the work that has already gone into the server. Suggestions are an important tool to give players a voice directly in how the server changes and grows. Discussions on suggestions should be collective and lively, inviting agreeing and dissenting views alike. However, suggestions are simply the beginning of a lengthy and often arduous process of consideration and implementation. We appreciate your passion, and we ask for your patience.
    1 point
  10. I’ve heard enough, -1 improcco jetpacks
    1 point
  11. you know Id respect that if you got all the chuckle heads to remove their unnecessary Dumbs from my post
    0 points
  12. over My dead body ya British goober <3
    0 points
  13. I was tired and off my meds.... Was messing with Badger for not including Dire Squad Im all for WP getting them FIRST Eventually Dire Squad As well :D
    0 points
  14. i did not gate keep this i told jugg and reborn about it and they agreed to it
    0 points
  15. alright, enough is enough my friends locking this, dev team will consider it once server suggestions close
    0 points
  16. This is so real. @Charleshow could you not ask ever member of every battalion their opinion prior to posting? SMH remove this guy from Fox. +1 tho nothing wrong with some change
    -1 points
  17. -1 points
  18. - Can we please keep this to the point at hand and not clog up the suggestion -
    -1 points
  19. +1 The dire squad helmets are legit just ugly. No offense to ANYONE who worked on you, you spent time and effort on the helmet and its very appreciative of the fact but these helmets were what we wanted originally and we should have them/ Maybe have the current helmet go to another squad or battalion while we use the EVO because come in.........its so much better
    -1 points
  20. -1 We already have Red Squadron, Ghost Company, and 2ndAC. We barely managed to fill all three, and you want another subunit. I can understand thinking we could get it based on something said prior by server leadership (if it's unique, we will add it), but this is too much. Work on fixing the issues we currently have before even think of adding more. Jayarr himself said it point and clear - You cannot get this without removing one. You cannot wiggle out of it and I personally do not see you removing any of them.
    -3 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...