Leaderboard

1 of my bans was from shooting up logics ( old gree's ) tryout for kicking us out of a claimed citadel by me because he was a BCMD

a man of action +1

ENG's just got a LOT of new stuff to play with, gonna hold off on this untill we see how the dust settles on that. -1 for now could change if you where to put this up again/if this stays up for a while and we see the ENG buff wasn't enough. EDIT: After thinking about it and sitting with this I am changing mine to +1. I think all regiments need buff's to their weapons RN they are kinda overshadowed by the ARC loadout. @Marvel you have my support.

This was a LONG time ago, and people change. This lines up with being roughly a year old, so I am intrigued. 4th Offence hasn't been a bannable offence for roughly 8-10 months, so this can almost be nullified all together. Also looking at the time stamps being very similar, you can see that the bottom ban was an updated time for the top ban and thus these can be realistically merged either way. Also "2 PO's" isn't a reason to ban someone, however it is a reason for an extended ban time. It seems as though you've caused a handful of issues in the past, however I feel as though we should give you the same treatment other players that have done worse have gotten which is giving you a second chance and a long probationary period where even a minor offence would result in you being permanently banned again and no further chances for appeal. (Would be logged down on Staff Roster in list of people that are not allowed to appeal). So from me, it's a +1 however I will leave the decision to the Directors @Fizzik & @Mitchell

-1, Its Realy not Needed. And the Main Reason Cody has a Jetpack is becuse of 2ndAC... (At least that is the Reason I beleave he has it i could be wrong) 212th also specialized in Areal Assaults. ...7th Sky Corps...

This was a package to support ron's server, so more than likely not ^^.

+1